Cargando…

Why Is a b-value Range of 1500–2000 s/mm(2) Optimal for Evaluating Prostatic Index Lesions on Synthetic Diffusion-Weighted Imaging?

OBJECTIVE: It is uncertain why a b-value range of 1500–2000 s/mm(2) is optimal. This study was aimed at qualitatively and quantitatively analyzing the optimal b-value range of synthetic diffusion-weighted imaging (sDWI) for evaluating prostatic index lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cha, So Yeon, Kim, EunJu, Park, Sung Yoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8154789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33660462
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0836
_version_ 1783699069803167744
author Cha, So Yeon
Kim, EunJu
Park, Sung Yoon
author_facet Cha, So Yeon
Kim, EunJu
Park, Sung Yoon
author_sort Cha, So Yeon
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: It is uncertain why a b-value range of 1500–2000 s/mm(2) is optimal. This study was aimed at qualitatively and quantitatively analyzing the optimal b-value range of synthetic diffusion-weighted imaging (sDWI) for evaluating prostatic index lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 92 patients who underwent DWI and targeted biopsy for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-suggested index lesions. We generated sDWI at a b-value range of 1000–3000 s/mm(2) using dedicated software and true DWI data at b-values of 0, 100, and 1000 s/mm(2). We hypothesized that lesion conspicuity would be best when the background (i.e., MRI-suggested benign prostatic [bP] and periprostatic [pP] regions) signal intensity (SI) is suppressed and becomes homogeneous. To prove this hypothesis, we performed both qualitative and quantitative analyses. For qualitative analysis, two independent readers analyzed the b-value showing the best visual conspicuity of an MRI-suggested index lesion. For quantitative analysis, the readers assessed the b-value showing the same bP and pP region SI. The 95% confidence interval (CI) or interquartile range of qualitatively and quantitatively selected optimal b-values was assessed, and the mean difference between qualitatively and quantitatively selected b-values was investigated. RESULTS: The 95% CIs of optimal b-values from qualitative and quantitative analyses were 1761–1805 s/mm(2) and 1640–1771 s/mm(2) (median, 1790 s/mm(2) vs. 1705 s/mm(2); p = 0.003) for reader 1, and 1835–1895 s/mm(2) and 1705–1841 s/mm(2) (median, 1872 s/mm(2) vs. 1763 s/mm(2); p = 0.022) for reader 2, respectively. Interquartile ranges of qualitatively and quantitatively selected optimal b-values were 1735–1873 s/mm(2) and 1573–1867 s/mm(2) for reader 1, and 1775–1945 s/mm(2) and 1591–1955 s/mm(2) for reader 2, respectively. Bland–Altman plots consistently demonstrated a mean difference of less than 100 s/mm(2) between qualitatively and quantitatively selected optimal b-values. CONCLUSION: b-value range showing a homogeneous background signal may be optimal for evaluating prostatic index lesions on sDWI. Our qualitative and quantitative data consistently recommend b-values of 1500–2000 s/mm(2).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8154789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81547892021-06-08 Why Is a b-value Range of 1500–2000 s/mm(2) Optimal for Evaluating Prostatic Index Lesions on Synthetic Diffusion-Weighted Imaging? Cha, So Yeon Kim, EunJu Park, Sung Yoon Korean J Radiol Genitourinary Imaging OBJECTIVE: It is uncertain why a b-value range of 1500–2000 s/mm(2) is optimal. This study was aimed at qualitatively and quantitatively analyzing the optimal b-value range of synthetic diffusion-weighted imaging (sDWI) for evaluating prostatic index lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 92 patients who underwent DWI and targeted biopsy for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-suggested index lesions. We generated sDWI at a b-value range of 1000–3000 s/mm(2) using dedicated software and true DWI data at b-values of 0, 100, and 1000 s/mm(2). We hypothesized that lesion conspicuity would be best when the background (i.e., MRI-suggested benign prostatic [bP] and periprostatic [pP] regions) signal intensity (SI) is suppressed and becomes homogeneous. To prove this hypothesis, we performed both qualitative and quantitative analyses. For qualitative analysis, two independent readers analyzed the b-value showing the best visual conspicuity of an MRI-suggested index lesion. For quantitative analysis, the readers assessed the b-value showing the same bP and pP region SI. The 95% confidence interval (CI) or interquartile range of qualitatively and quantitatively selected optimal b-values was assessed, and the mean difference between qualitatively and quantitatively selected b-values was investigated. RESULTS: The 95% CIs of optimal b-values from qualitative and quantitative analyses were 1761–1805 s/mm(2) and 1640–1771 s/mm(2) (median, 1790 s/mm(2) vs. 1705 s/mm(2); p = 0.003) for reader 1, and 1835–1895 s/mm(2) and 1705–1841 s/mm(2) (median, 1872 s/mm(2) vs. 1763 s/mm(2); p = 0.022) for reader 2, respectively. Interquartile ranges of qualitatively and quantitatively selected optimal b-values were 1735–1873 s/mm(2) and 1573–1867 s/mm(2) for reader 1, and 1775–1945 s/mm(2) and 1591–1955 s/mm(2) for reader 2, respectively. Bland–Altman plots consistently demonstrated a mean difference of less than 100 s/mm(2) between qualitatively and quantitatively selected optimal b-values. CONCLUSION: b-value range showing a homogeneous background signal may be optimal for evaluating prostatic index lesions on sDWI. Our qualitative and quantitative data consistently recommend b-values of 1500–2000 s/mm(2). The Korean Society of Radiology 2021-06 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8154789/ /pubmed/33660462 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0836 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Genitourinary Imaging
Cha, So Yeon
Kim, EunJu
Park, Sung Yoon
Why Is a b-value Range of 1500–2000 s/mm(2) Optimal for Evaluating Prostatic Index Lesions on Synthetic Diffusion-Weighted Imaging?
title Why Is a b-value Range of 1500–2000 s/mm(2) Optimal for Evaluating Prostatic Index Lesions on Synthetic Diffusion-Weighted Imaging?
title_full Why Is a b-value Range of 1500–2000 s/mm(2) Optimal for Evaluating Prostatic Index Lesions on Synthetic Diffusion-Weighted Imaging?
title_fullStr Why Is a b-value Range of 1500–2000 s/mm(2) Optimal for Evaluating Prostatic Index Lesions on Synthetic Diffusion-Weighted Imaging?
title_full_unstemmed Why Is a b-value Range of 1500–2000 s/mm(2) Optimal for Evaluating Prostatic Index Lesions on Synthetic Diffusion-Weighted Imaging?
title_short Why Is a b-value Range of 1500–2000 s/mm(2) Optimal for Evaluating Prostatic Index Lesions on Synthetic Diffusion-Weighted Imaging?
title_sort why is a b-value range of 1500–2000 s/mm(2) optimal for evaluating prostatic index lesions on synthetic diffusion-weighted imaging?
topic Genitourinary Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8154789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33660462
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0836
work_keys_str_mv AT chasoyeon whyisabvaluerangeof15002000smm2optimalforevaluatingprostaticindexlesionsonsyntheticdiffusionweightedimaging
AT kimeunju whyisabvaluerangeof15002000smm2optimalforevaluatingprostaticindexlesionsonsyntheticdiffusionweightedimaging
AT parksungyoon whyisabvaluerangeof15002000smm2optimalforevaluatingprostaticindexlesionsonsyntheticdiffusionweightedimaging