Cargando…
A covered eye fails to follow an object moving in depth
To clearly view approaching objects, the eyes rotate inward (vergence), and the intraocular lenses focus (accommodation). Current ocular control models assume both eyes are driven by unitary vergence and unitary accommodation commands that causally interact. The models typically describe discrete ga...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8154899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90371-8 |
_version_ | 1783699095637983232 |
---|---|
author | Chandna, Arvind Badler, Jeremy Singh, Devashish Watamaniuk, Scott Heinen, Stephen |
author_facet | Chandna, Arvind Badler, Jeremy Singh, Devashish Watamaniuk, Scott Heinen, Stephen |
author_sort | Chandna, Arvind |
collection | PubMed |
description | To clearly view approaching objects, the eyes rotate inward (vergence), and the intraocular lenses focus (accommodation). Current ocular control models assume both eyes are driven by unitary vergence and unitary accommodation commands that causally interact. The models typically describe discrete gaze shifts to non-accommodative targets performed under laboratory conditions. We probe these unitary signals using a physical stimulus moving in depth on the midline while recording vergence and accommodation simultaneously from both eyes in normal observers. Using monocular viewing, retinal disparity is removed, leaving only monocular cues for interpreting the object’s motion in depth. The viewing eye always followed the target’s motion. However, the occluded eye did not follow the target, and surprisingly, rotated out of phase with it. In contrast, accommodation in both eyes was synchronized with the target under monocular viewing. The results challenge existing unitary vergence command theories, and causal accommodation-vergence linkage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8154899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81548992021-05-27 A covered eye fails to follow an object moving in depth Chandna, Arvind Badler, Jeremy Singh, Devashish Watamaniuk, Scott Heinen, Stephen Sci Rep Article To clearly view approaching objects, the eyes rotate inward (vergence), and the intraocular lenses focus (accommodation). Current ocular control models assume both eyes are driven by unitary vergence and unitary accommodation commands that causally interact. The models typically describe discrete gaze shifts to non-accommodative targets performed under laboratory conditions. We probe these unitary signals using a physical stimulus moving in depth on the midline while recording vergence and accommodation simultaneously from both eyes in normal observers. Using monocular viewing, retinal disparity is removed, leaving only monocular cues for interpreting the object’s motion in depth. The viewing eye always followed the target’s motion. However, the occluded eye did not follow the target, and surprisingly, rotated out of phase with it. In contrast, accommodation in both eyes was synchronized with the target under monocular viewing. The results challenge existing unitary vergence command theories, and causal accommodation-vergence linkage. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8154899/ /pubmed/34040063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90371-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Chandna, Arvind Badler, Jeremy Singh, Devashish Watamaniuk, Scott Heinen, Stephen A covered eye fails to follow an object moving in depth |
title | A covered eye fails to follow an object moving in depth |
title_full | A covered eye fails to follow an object moving in depth |
title_fullStr | A covered eye fails to follow an object moving in depth |
title_full_unstemmed | A covered eye fails to follow an object moving in depth |
title_short | A covered eye fails to follow an object moving in depth |
title_sort | covered eye fails to follow an object moving in depth |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8154899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90371-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chandnaarvind acoveredeyefailstofollowanobjectmovingindepth AT badlerjeremy acoveredeyefailstofollowanobjectmovingindepth AT singhdevashish acoveredeyefailstofollowanobjectmovingindepth AT watamaniukscott acoveredeyefailstofollowanobjectmovingindepth AT heinenstephen acoveredeyefailstofollowanobjectmovingindepth AT chandnaarvind coveredeyefailstofollowanobjectmovingindepth AT badlerjeremy coveredeyefailstofollowanobjectmovingindepth AT singhdevashish coveredeyefailstofollowanobjectmovingindepth AT watamaniukscott coveredeyefailstofollowanobjectmovingindepth AT heinenstephen coveredeyefailstofollowanobjectmovingindepth |