Cargando…
Quality indicators development and prioritisation for emergency medical call centres: a stakeholder consensus
INTRODUCTION: Emergency medical regulation is a risky activity. In France, emergency medical societies have proposed activity and performance indicators, but their lists are non-exhaustive, unstructured and used heterogeneously among emergency medical call centres (Centres de Réception et de Régulat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8154933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001176 |
_version_ | 1783699102772494336 |
---|---|
author | Alem, Lucie Bacqué, Julie Guihenneuc, Jérémy Delelis-Fanien, Henri Mimoz, Olivier Migeot, Virginie |
author_facet | Alem, Lucie Bacqué, Julie Guihenneuc, Jérémy Delelis-Fanien, Henri Mimoz, Olivier Migeot, Virginie |
author_sort | Alem, Lucie |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Emergency medical regulation is a risky activity. In France, emergency medical societies have proposed activity and performance indicators, but their lists are non-exhaustive, unstructured and used heterogeneously among emergency medical call centres (Centres de Réception et de Régulation des Appels, CRRA). Our objective was to build by means of regional stakeholder consensus an operational quality dashboard for CRRAs. METHODS: We conducted an observational step in a French CRRA from June to September 2018 and at the same time listed existing activity and quality indicators through a rapid international literature review. We adapted and classified all indicators identified in a structured table. We prioritised them from April to September 2019 by seeking consensus with one regulator physician and one medical regulation assistant from the 13 CRRAs of the largest French region. We used an adapted Delphi method with a prioritisation scale from 1 to 9. RESULTS: The rapid review of literature included 33 studies among the 414 identified and, with the first observational step, resulted in a list of 360 quality indicators covering the following areas: material resources, human resources, quality approach, call handling and postcall support. 15 of the 26 members participated in the entire process. Seventy indicators were considered as priorities with strong agreement among participants. We built an operational dashboard of quality indicators deemed high priority and provided 70 descriptive indicator sheets. CONCLUSION: Our study allowed to build an operational quality dashboard for CRRAs as a ready-to-use support for an internal audit, for prioritisation of quality approach actions and for national and international benchmarking. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8154933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81549332021-06-10 Quality indicators development and prioritisation for emergency medical call centres: a stakeholder consensus Alem, Lucie Bacqué, Julie Guihenneuc, Jérémy Delelis-Fanien, Henri Mimoz, Olivier Migeot, Virginie BMJ Open Qual Original Research INTRODUCTION: Emergency medical regulation is a risky activity. In France, emergency medical societies have proposed activity and performance indicators, but their lists are non-exhaustive, unstructured and used heterogeneously among emergency medical call centres (Centres de Réception et de Régulation des Appels, CRRA). Our objective was to build by means of regional stakeholder consensus an operational quality dashboard for CRRAs. METHODS: We conducted an observational step in a French CRRA from June to September 2018 and at the same time listed existing activity and quality indicators through a rapid international literature review. We adapted and classified all indicators identified in a structured table. We prioritised them from April to September 2019 by seeking consensus with one regulator physician and one medical regulation assistant from the 13 CRRAs of the largest French region. We used an adapted Delphi method with a prioritisation scale from 1 to 9. RESULTS: The rapid review of literature included 33 studies among the 414 identified and, with the first observational step, resulted in a list of 360 quality indicators covering the following areas: material resources, human resources, quality approach, call handling and postcall support. 15 of the 26 members participated in the entire process. Seventy indicators were considered as priorities with strong agreement among participants. We built an operational dashboard of quality indicators deemed high priority and provided 70 descriptive indicator sheets. CONCLUSION: Our study allowed to build an operational quality dashboard for CRRAs as a ready-to-use support for an internal audit, for prioritisation of quality approach actions and for national and international benchmarking. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8154933/ /pubmed/34035128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001176 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Alem, Lucie Bacqué, Julie Guihenneuc, Jérémy Delelis-Fanien, Henri Mimoz, Olivier Migeot, Virginie Quality indicators development and prioritisation for emergency medical call centres: a stakeholder consensus |
title | Quality indicators development and prioritisation for emergency medical call centres: a stakeholder consensus |
title_full | Quality indicators development and prioritisation for emergency medical call centres: a stakeholder consensus |
title_fullStr | Quality indicators development and prioritisation for emergency medical call centres: a stakeholder consensus |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality indicators development and prioritisation for emergency medical call centres: a stakeholder consensus |
title_short | Quality indicators development and prioritisation for emergency medical call centres: a stakeholder consensus |
title_sort | quality indicators development and prioritisation for emergency medical call centres: a stakeholder consensus |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8154933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001176 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alemlucie qualityindicatorsdevelopmentandprioritisationforemergencymedicalcallcentresastakeholderconsensus AT bacquejulie qualityindicatorsdevelopmentandprioritisationforemergencymedicalcallcentresastakeholderconsensus AT guihenneucjeremy qualityindicatorsdevelopmentandprioritisationforemergencymedicalcallcentresastakeholderconsensus AT delelisfanienhenri qualityindicatorsdevelopmentandprioritisationforemergencymedicalcallcentresastakeholderconsensus AT mimozolivier qualityindicatorsdevelopmentandprioritisationforemergencymedicalcallcentresastakeholderconsensus AT migeotvirginie qualityindicatorsdevelopmentandprioritisationforemergencymedicalcallcentresastakeholderconsensus |