Cargando…

Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for development of diabetic foot ulceration: an analysis of data from five cohort studies

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to develop and validate a clinical prediction rule (CPR) for foot ulceration in people with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Development of a CPR using individual participant data from four international cohort studies identified by systematic review, wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chappell, Francesca M, Crawford, Fay, Horne, Margaret, Leese, Graham P, Martin, Angela, Weller, David, Boulton, Andrew J M, Abbott, Caroline, Monteiro-Soares, Matilde, Veves, Aristidis, Riley, Richard D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8154962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002150
_version_ 1783699108111843328
author Chappell, Francesca M
Crawford, Fay
Horne, Margaret
Leese, Graham P
Martin, Angela
Weller, David
Boulton, Andrew J M
Abbott, Caroline
Monteiro-Soares, Matilde
Veves, Aristidis
Riley, Richard D
author_facet Chappell, Francesca M
Crawford, Fay
Horne, Margaret
Leese, Graham P
Martin, Angela
Weller, David
Boulton, Andrew J M
Abbott, Caroline
Monteiro-Soares, Matilde
Veves, Aristidis
Riley, Richard D
author_sort Chappell, Francesca M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to develop and validate a clinical prediction rule (CPR) for foot ulceration in people with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Development of a CPR using individual participant data from four international cohort studies identified by systematic review, with validation in a fifth study. Development cohorts were from primary and secondary care foot clinics in Europe and the USA (n=8255, adults over 18 years old, with diabetes, ulcer free at recruitment). Using data from monofilament testing, presence/absence of pulses, and participant history of previous ulcer and/or amputation, we developed a simple CPR to predict who will develop a foot ulcer within 2 years of initial assessment and validated it in a fifth study (n=3324). The CPR’s performance was assessed with C-statistics, calibration slopes, calibration-in-the-large, and a net benefit analysis. RESULTS: CPR scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 had a risk of ulcer within 2 years of 2.4% (95% CI 1.5% to 3.9%), 6.0% (95% CI 3.5% to 9.5%), 14.0% (95% CI 8.5% to 21.3%), 29.2% (95% CI 19.2% to 41.0%), and 51.1% (95% CI 37.9% to 64.1%), respectively. In the validation dataset, calibration-in-the-large was −0.374 (95% CI −0.561 to −0.187) and calibration slope 1.139 (95% CI 0.994 to 1.283). The C-statistic was 0.829 (95% CI 0.790 to 0.868). The net benefit analysis suggested that people with a CPR score of 1 or more (risk of ulceration 6.0% or more) should be referred for treatment. CONCLUSION: The clinical prediction rule is simple, using routinely obtained data, and could help prevent foot ulcers by redirecting care to patients with scores of 1 or above. It has been validated in a community setting, and requires further validation in secondary care settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8154962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81549622021-06-10 Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for development of diabetic foot ulceration: an analysis of data from five cohort studies Chappell, Francesca M Crawford, Fay Horne, Margaret Leese, Graham P Martin, Angela Weller, David Boulton, Andrew J M Abbott, Caroline Monteiro-Soares, Matilde Veves, Aristidis Riley, Richard D BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Epidemiology/Health services research INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to develop and validate a clinical prediction rule (CPR) for foot ulceration in people with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Development of a CPR using individual participant data from four international cohort studies identified by systematic review, with validation in a fifth study. Development cohorts were from primary and secondary care foot clinics in Europe and the USA (n=8255, adults over 18 years old, with diabetes, ulcer free at recruitment). Using data from monofilament testing, presence/absence of pulses, and participant history of previous ulcer and/or amputation, we developed a simple CPR to predict who will develop a foot ulcer within 2 years of initial assessment and validated it in a fifth study (n=3324). The CPR’s performance was assessed with C-statistics, calibration slopes, calibration-in-the-large, and a net benefit analysis. RESULTS: CPR scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 had a risk of ulcer within 2 years of 2.4% (95% CI 1.5% to 3.9%), 6.0% (95% CI 3.5% to 9.5%), 14.0% (95% CI 8.5% to 21.3%), 29.2% (95% CI 19.2% to 41.0%), and 51.1% (95% CI 37.9% to 64.1%), respectively. In the validation dataset, calibration-in-the-large was −0.374 (95% CI −0.561 to −0.187) and calibration slope 1.139 (95% CI 0.994 to 1.283). The C-statistic was 0.829 (95% CI 0.790 to 0.868). The net benefit analysis suggested that people with a CPR score of 1 or more (risk of ulceration 6.0% or more) should be referred for treatment. CONCLUSION: The clinical prediction rule is simple, using routinely obtained data, and could help prevent foot ulcers by redirecting care to patients with scores of 1 or above. It has been validated in a community setting, and requires further validation in secondary care settings. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8154962/ /pubmed/34035053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002150 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology/Health services research
Chappell, Francesca M
Crawford, Fay
Horne, Margaret
Leese, Graham P
Martin, Angela
Weller, David
Boulton, Andrew J M
Abbott, Caroline
Monteiro-Soares, Matilde
Veves, Aristidis
Riley, Richard D
Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for development of diabetic foot ulceration: an analysis of data from five cohort studies
title Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for development of diabetic foot ulceration: an analysis of data from five cohort studies
title_full Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for development of diabetic foot ulceration: an analysis of data from five cohort studies
title_fullStr Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for development of diabetic foot ulceration: an analysis of data from five cohort studies
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for development of diabetic foot ulceration: an analysis of data from five cohort studies
title_short Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for development of diabetic foot ulceration: an analysis of data from five cohort studies
title_sort development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for development of diabetic foot ulceration: an analysis of data from five cohort studies
topic Epidemiology/Health services research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8154962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002150
work_keys_str_mv AT chappellfrancescam developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpredictionrulefordevelopmentofdiabeticfootulcerationananalysisofdatafromfivecohortstudies
AT crawfordfay developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpredictionrulefordevelopmentofdiabeticfootulcerationananalysisofdatafromfivecohortstudies
AT hornemargaret developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpredictionrulefordevelopmentofdiabeticfootulcerationananalysisofdatafromfivecohortstudies
AT leesegrahamp developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpredictionrulefordevelopmentofdiabeticfootulcerationananalysisofdatafromfivecohortstudies
AT martinangela developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpredictionrulefordevelopmentofdiabeticfootulcerationananalysisofdatafromfivecohortstudies
AT wellerdavid developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpredictionrulefordevelopmentofdiabeticfootulcerationananalysisofdatafromfivecohortstudies
AT boultonandrewjm developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpredictionrulefordevelopmentofdiabeticfootulcerationananalysisofdatafromfivecohortstudies
AT abbottcaroline developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpredictionrulefordevelopmentofdiabeticfootulcerationananalysisofdatafromfivecohortstudies
AT monteirosoaresmatilde developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpredictionrulefordevelopmentofdiabeticfootulcerationananalysisofdatafromfivecohortstudies
AT vevesaristidis developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpredictionrulefordevelopmentofdiabeticfootulcerationananalysisofdatafromfivecohortstudies
AT rileyrichardd developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpredictionrulefordevelopmentofdiabeticfootulcerationananalysisofdatafromfivecohortstudies