Cargando…

Occupational Injuries and Use of Benzodiazepines: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis

Background: Benzodiazepines have been widely used in clinical practice for over four decades and continue to be one of the most consumed and highly prescribed class of drugs available in the treatment of anxiety, depression, and insomnia. The literature indicates that Benzodiazepine users at a signi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garbarino, Sergio, Lanteri, Paola, Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi, Gualerzi, Giovanni, Riccò, Matteo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8155305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34054447
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.629719
_version_ 1783699172085465088
author Garbarino, Sergio
Lanteri, Paola
Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi
Gualerzi, Giovanni
Riccò, Matteo
author_facet Garbarino, Sergio
Lanteri, Paola
Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi
Gualerzi, Giovanni
Riccò, Matteo
author_sort Garbarino, Sergio
collection PubMed
description Background: Benzodiazepines have been widely used in clinical practice for over four decades and continue to be one of the most consumed and highly prescribed class of drugs available in the treatment of anxiety, depression, and insomnia. The literature indicates that Benzodiazepine users at a significantly increased risk of Motor Vehicle accidents compared to non-users but the impact on injuries at workplace is not well-defined. We aimed to investigate whether use of benzodiazepine is associated with increased risk of occupational injuries (OI). Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) among case controls, cross-sectional studies, either questionnaire or laboratory exams based. Results: A total of 13 studies met inclusion criteria, involving 324,168 OI from seven different countries, with an estimated occurrence of benzodiazepine positivity of 2.71% (95% CI 1.45–4.98). A total of 14 estimates were retrieved. Of them, 10 were based on laboratory analyses, three on institutional databases, while one study was based on questionnaires. Regarding the occupational groups, three estimates focused on commercial drivers (0.73%, 95% CI 0.12–4.30), that exhibited a reduced risk ratio for benzodiazepine positivity compared to other occupational groups (RR 0.109, 95% CI 0.063–0.187). Eventually, no increased risk for benzodiazepine positivity was identified, either from case control studies (OR 1.520, 95% CI 0.801–2.885, I(2) 76%), or cross sectional studies, when only laboratory based estimates were taken in account (OR 0.590, 95% CI 0.253–1.377, I(2) 63%). Conclusions: Even though benzodiazepines have the potential to increase injury rates among casual and chronic users, available evidence are insufficient to sustain this hypothesis, particularly when focusing on laboratory-based studies (i.e., studies the characterized the benzodiazepine immediately before the event).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8155305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81553052021-05-28 Occupational Injuries and Use of Benzodiazepines: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis Garbarino, Sergio Lanteri, Paola Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi Gualerzi, Giovanni Riccò, Matteo Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience Background: Benzodiazepines have been widely used in clinical practice for over four decades and continue to be one of the most consumed and highly prescribed class of drugs available in the treatment of anxiety, depression, and insomnia. The literature indicates that Benzodiazepine users at a significantly increased risk of Motor Vehicle accidents compared to non-users but the impact on injuries at workplace is not well-defined. We aimed to investigate whether use of benzodiazepine is associated with increased risk of occupational injuries (OI). Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) among case controls, cross-sectional studies, either questionnaire or laboratory exams based. Results: A total of 13 studies met inclusion criteria, involving 324,168 OI from seven different countries, with an estimated occurrence of benzodiazepine positivity of 2.71% (95% CI 1.45–4.98). A total of 14 estimates were retrieved. Of them, 10 were based on laboratory analyses, three on institutional databases, while one study was based on questionnaires. Regarding the occupational groups, three estimates focused on commercial drivers (0.73%, 95% CI 0.12–4.30), that exhibited a reduced risk ratio for benzodiazepine positivity compared to other occupational groups (RR 0.109, 95% CI 0.063–0.187). Eventually, no increased risk for benzodiazepine positivity was identified, either from case control studies (OR 1.520, 95% CI 0.801–2.885, I(2) 76%), or cross sectional studies, when only laboratory based estimates were taken in account (OR 0.590, 95% CI 0.253–1.377, I(2) 63%). Conclusions: Even though benzodiazepines have the potential to increase injury rates among casual and chronic users, available evidence are insufficient to sustain this hypothesis, particularly when focusing on laboratory-based studies (i.e., studies the characterized the benzodiazepine immediately before the event). Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8155305/ /pubmed/34054447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.629719 Text en Copyright © 2021 Garbarino, Lanteri, Bragazzi, Gualerzi and Riccò. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Garbarino, Sergio
Lanteri, Paola
Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi
Gualerzi, Giovanni
Riccò, Matteo
Occupational Injuries and Use of Benzodiazepines: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis
title Occupational Injuries and Use of Benzodiazepines: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis
title_full Occupational Injuries and Use of Benzodiazepines: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis
title_fullStr Occupational Injuries and Use of Benzodiazepines: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis
title_full_unstemmed Occupational Injuries and Use of Benzodiazepines: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis
title_short Occupational Injuries and Use of Benzodiazepines: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis
title_sort occupational injuries and use of benzodiazepines: a systematic review and metanalysis
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8155305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34054447
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.629719
work_keys_str_mv AT garbarinosergio occupationalinjuriesanduseofbenzodiazepinesasystematicreviewandmetanalysis
AT lanteripaola occupationalinjuriesanduseofbenzodiazepinesasystematicreviewandmetanalysis
AT bragazzinicolaluigi occupationalinjuriesanduseofbenzodiazepinesasystematicreviewandmetanalysis
AT gualerzigiovanni occupationalinjuriesanduseofbenzodiazepinesasystematicreviewandmetanalysis
AT riccomatteo occupationalinjuriesanduseofbenzodiazepinesasystematicreviewandmetanalysis