Cargando…

Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy

Background: The impact of MRI-lesion targeted (TB) and systematic biopsy (SB) Gleason score (GS) as a predictor for final pathological GS still remains unclear. Methods: All patients with TB + SB, and subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 01/2014-12/2020 were analyzed. Rank correlation coeff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wenzel, Mike, Preisser, Felix, Wittler, Clarissa, Hoeh, Benedikt, Wild, Peter J., Tschäbunin, Alexandra, Bodelle, Boris, Würnschimmel, Christoph, Tilki, Derya, Graefen, Markus, Becker, Andreas, Karakiewicz, Pierre I, Chun, Felix K. H., Kluth, Luis A, Köllermann, Jens, Mandel, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8155831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34063557
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050882
_version_ 1783699295038341120
author Wenzel, Mike
Preisser, Felix
Wittler, Clarissa
Hoeh, Benedikt
Wild, Peter J.
Tschäbunin, Alexandra
Bodelle, Boris
Würnschimmel, Christoph
Tilki, Derya
Graefen, Markus
Becker, Andreas
Karakiewicz, Pierre I
Chun, Felix K. H.
Kluth, Luis A
Köllermann, Jens
Mandel, Philipp
author_facet Wenzel, Mike
Preisser, Felix
Wittler, Clarissa
Hoeh, Benedikt
Wild, Peter J.
Tschäbunin, Alexandra
Bodelle, Boris
Würnschimmel, Christoph
Tilki, Derya
Graefen, Markus
Becker, Andreas
Karakiewicz, Pierre I
Chun, Felix K. H.
Kluth, Luis A
Köllermann, Jens
Mandel, Philipp
author_sort Wenzel, Mike
collection PubMed
description Background: The impact of MRI-lesion targeted (TB) and systematic biopsy (SB) Gleason score (GS) as a predictor for final pathological GS still remains unclear. Methods: All patients with TB + SB, and subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 01/2014-12/2020 were analyzed. Rank correlation coefficient predicted concordance with pathological GS for patients’ TB and SB GS, as well as for the combined effect of SB + TB. Results: Of 159 eligible patients, 77% were biopsy naïve. For SB taken in addition to TB, a Spearman’s correlation of +0.33 was observed regarding final GS. Rates of concordance, upgrading, and downgrading were 37.1, 37.1 and 25.8%, respectively. For TB, a +0.52 correlation was computed regarding final GS. Rates of concordance, upgrading and downgrading for TB biopsy GS were 45.9, 33.3, and 20.8%, respectively. For the combination of SB + TB, a correlation of +0.59 was observed. Rates of concordance, upgrading and downgrading were 49.7, 15.1 and 35.2%, respectively. The combined effect of SB + TB resulted in a lower upgrading rate, relative to TB and SB (both p < 0.001), but a higher downgrading rate, relative to TB (p < 0.01). Conclusions: GS obtained from TB provided higher concordance and lower upgrading and downgrading rates, relative to SB GS with regard to final pathology. The combined effect of SB + TB led to the highest concordance rate and the lowest upgrading rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8155831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81558312021-05-28 Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy Wenzel, Mike Preisser, Felix Wittler, Clarissa Hoeh, Benedikt Wild, Peter J. Tschäbunin, Alexandra Bodelle, Boris Würnschimmel, Christoph Tilki, Derya Graefen, Markus Becker, Andreas Karakiewicz, Pierre I Chun, Felix K. H. Kluth, Luis A Köllermann, Jens Mandel, Philipp Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: The impact of MRI-lesion targeted (TB) and systematic biopsy (SB) Gleason score (GS) as a predictor for final pathological GS still remains unclear. Methods: All patients with TB + SB, and subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 01/2014-12/2020 were analyzed. Rank correlation coefficient predicted concordance with pathological GS for patients’ TB and SB GS, as well as for the combined effect of SB + TB. Results: Of 159 eligible patients, 77% were biopsy naïve. For SB taken in addition to TB, a Spearman’s correlation of +0.33 was observed regarding final GS. Rates of concordance, upgrading, and downgrading were 37.1, 37.1 and 25.8%, respectively. For TB, a +0.52 correlation was computed regarding final GS. Rates of concordance, upgrading and downgrading for TB biopsy GS were 45.9, 33.3, and 20.8%, respectively. For the combination of SB + TB, a correlation of +0.59 was observed. Rates of concordance, upgrading and downgrading were 49.7, 15.1 and 35.2%, respectively. The combined effect of SB + TB resulted in a lower upgrading rate, relative to TB and SB (both p < 0.001), but a higher downgrading rate, relative to TB (p < 0.01). Conclusions: GS obtained from TB provided higher concordance and lower upgrading and downgrading rates, relative to SB GS with regard to final pathology. The combined effect of SB + TB led to the highest concordance rate and the lowest upgrading rate. MDPI 2021-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8155831/ /pubmed/34063557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050882 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wenzel, Mike
Preisser, Felix
Wittler, Clarissa
Hoeh, Benedikt
Wild, Peter J.
Tschäbunin, Alexandra
Bodelle, Boris
Würnschimmel, Christoph
Tilki, Derya
Graefen, Markus
Becker, Andreas
Karakiewicz, Pierre I
Chun, Felix K. H.
Kluth, Luis A
Köllermann, Jens
Mandel, Philipp
Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
title Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
title_full Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
title_fullStr Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
title_short Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
title_sort correlation of mri-lesion targeted biopsy vs. systematic biopsy gleason score with final pathological gleason score after radical prostatectomy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8155831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34063557
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050882
work_keys_str_mv AT wenzelmike correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy
AT preisserfelix correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy
AT wittlerclarissa correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy
AT hoehbenedikt correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy
AT wildpeterj correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy
AT tschabuninalexandra correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy
AT bodelleboris correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy
AT wurnschimmelchristoph correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy
AT tilkiderya correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy
AT graefenmarkus correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy
AT beckerandreas correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy
AT karakiewiczpierrei correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy
AT chunfelixkh correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy
AT kluthluisa correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy
AT kollermannjens correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy
AT mandelphilipp correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy