Cargando…
Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
Background: The impact of MRI-lesion targeted (TB) and systematic biopsy (SB) Gleason score (GS) as a predictor for final pathological GS still remains unclear. Methods: All patients with TB + SB, and subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 01/2014-12/2020 were analyzed. Rank correlation coeff...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8155831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34063557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050882 |
_version_ | 1783699295038341120 |
---|---|
author | Wenzel, Mike Preisser, Felix Wittler, Clarissa Hoeh, Benedikt Wild, Peter J. Tschäbunin, Alexandra Bodelle, Boris Würnschimmel, Christoph Tilki, Derya Graefen, Markus Becker, Andreas Karakiewicz, Pierre I Chun, Felix K. H. Kluth, Luis A Köllermann, Jens Mandel, Philipp |
author_facet | Wenzel, Mike Preisser, Felix Wittler, Clarissa Hoeh, Benedikt Wild, Peter J. Tschäbunin, Alexandra Bodelle, Boris Würnschimmel, Christoph Tilki, Derya Graefen, Markus Becker, Andreas Karakiewicz, Pierre I Chun, Felix K. H. Kluth, Luis A Köllermann, Jens Mandel, Philipp |
author_sort | Wenzel, Mike |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The impact of MRI-lesion targeted (TB) and systematic biopsy (SB) Gleason score (GS) as a predictor for final pathological GS still remains unclear. Methods: All patients with TB + SB, and subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 01/2014-12/2020 were analyzed. Rank correlation coefficient predicted concordance with pathological GS for patients’ TB and SB GS, as well as for the combined effect of SB + TB. Results: Of 159 eligible patients, 77% were biopsy naïve. For SB taken in addition to TB, a Spearman’s correlation of +0.33 was observed regarding final GS. Rates of concordance, upgrading, and downgrading were 37.1, 37.1 and 25.8%, respectively. For TB, a +0.52 correlation was computed regarding final GS. Rates of concordance, upgrading and downgrading for TB biopsy GS were 45.9, 33.3, and 20.8%, respectively. For the combination of SB + TB, a correlation of +0.59 was observed. Rates of concordance, upgrading and downgrading were 49.7, 15.1 and 35.2%, respectively. The combined effect of SB + TB resulted in a lower upgrading rate, relative to TB and SB (both p < 0.001), but a higher downgrading rate, relative to TB (p < 0.01). Conclusions: GS obtained from TB provided higher concordance and lower upgrading and downgrading rates, relative to SB GS with regard to final pathology. The combined effect of SB + TB led to the highest concordance rate and the lowest upgrading rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8155831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81558312021-05-28 Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy Wenzel, Mike Preisser, Felix Wittler, Clarissa Hoeh, Benedikt Wild, Peter J. Tschäbunin, Alexandra Bodelle, Boris Würnschimmel, Christoph Tilki, Derya Graefen, Markus Becker, Andreas Karakiewicz, Pierre I Chun, Felix K. H. Kluth, Luis A Köllermann, Jens Mandel, Philipp Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: The impact of MRI-lesion targeted (TB) and systematic biopsy (SB) Gleason score (GS) as a predictor for final pathological GS still remains unclear. Methods: All patients with TB + SB, and subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 01/2014-12/2020 were analyzed. Rank correlation coefficient predicted concordance with pathological GS for patients’ TB and SB GS, as well as for the combined effect of SB + TB. Results: Of 159 eligible patients, 77% were biopsy naïve. For SB taken in addition to TB, a Spearman’s correlation of +0.33 was observed regarding final GS. Rates of concordance, upgrading, and downgrading were 37.1, 37.1 and 25.8%, respectively. For TB, a +0.52 correlation was computed regarding final GS. Rates of concordance, upgrading and downgrading for TB biopsy GS were 45.9, 33.3, and 20.8%, respectively. For the combination of SB + TB, a correlation of +0.59 was observed. Rates of concordance, upgrading and downgrading were 49.7, 15.1 and 35.2%, respectively. The combined effect of SB + TB resulted in a lower upgrading rate, relative to TB and SB (both p < 0.001), but a higher downgrading rate, relative to TB (p < 0.01). Conclusions: GS obtained from TB provided higher concordance and lower upgrading and downgrading rates, relative to SB GS with regard to final pathology. The combined effect of SB + TB led to the highest concordance rate and the lowest upgrading rate. MDPI 2021-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8155831/ /pubmed/34063557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050882 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wenzel, Mike Preisser, Felix Wittler, Clarissa Hoeh, Benedikt Wild, Peter J. Tschäbunin, Alexandra Bodelle, Boris Würnschimmel, Christoph Tilki, Derya Graefen, Markus Becker, Andreas Karakiewicz, Pierre I Chun, Felix K. H. Kluth, Luis A Köllermann, Jens Mandel, Philipp Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy |
title | Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy |
title_full | Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy |
title_fullStr | Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy |
title_short | Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy |
title_sort | correlation of mri-lesion targeted biopsy vs. systematic biopsy gleason score with final pathological gleason score after radical prostatectomy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8155831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34063557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050882 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wenzelmike correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy AT preisserfelix correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy AT wittlerclarissa correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy AT hoehbenedikt correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy AT wildpeterj correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy AT tschabuninalexandra correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy AT bodelleboris correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy AT wurnschimmelchristoph correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy AT tilkiderya correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy AT graefenmarkus correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy AT beckerandreas correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy AT karakiewiczpierrei correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy AT chunfelixkh correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy AT kluthluisa correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy AT kollermannjens correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy AT mandelphilipp correlationofmrilesiontargetedbiopsyvssystematicbiopsygleasonscorewithfinalpathologicalgleasonscoreafterradicalprostatectomy |