Cargando…

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients’ Acceptance in E-Health Clinical Trials

Introduction: Telehealth (TH) interventions with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management were introduced in the literature more than 20 years ago with different labeling, but there was no summary for the overall acceptance and dropout rates as well as associated variables. Objective:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alghamdi, Saeed M., Rajah, Ahmed M. Al, Aldabayan, Yousef S., Aldhahir, Abdulelah M., Alqahtani, Jaber S., Alzahrani, Abdulaziz A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069028
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105230
_version_ 1783699344292052992
author Alghamdi, Saeed M.
Rajah, Ahmed M. Al
Aldabayan, Yousef S.
Aldhahir, Abdulelah M.
Alqahtani, Jaber S.
Alzahrani, Abdulaziz A.
author_facet Alghamdi, Saeed M.
Rajah, Ahmed M. Al
Aldabayan, Yousef S.
Aldhahir, Abdulelah M.
Alqahtani, Jaber S.
Alzahrani, Abdulaziz A.
author_sort Alghamdi, Saeed M.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Telehealth (TH) interventions with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management were introduced in the literature more than 20 years ago with different labeling, but there was no summary for the overall acceptance and dropout rates as well as associated variables. Objective: This review aims to summarize the acceptance and dropout rates used in TH interventions and identify to what extent clinical settings, sociodemographic factors, and intervention factors might impact the overall acceptance and completion rates of TH interventions. Methods: We conducted a systematic search up to April 2021 on CINAHL, PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane, Web of Sciences, and Embase to retrieve randomized and non-randomized control trials that provide TH interventions alone or accompanied with other interventions to individuals with COPD. Results: Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the unweighted average of acceptance and dropout rates for all included studies were 80% and 19%, respectively. A meta-analysis on the pooled difference between the acceptance rates and dropout rates (weighted by the sample size) revealed a significant difference in acceptance and dropout rates among all TH interventions 51% (95% CI 49% to 52; p < 0.001) and 63% (95% CI 60% to 67; p < 0.001), respectively. Analysis revealed that acceptance and dropout rates can be impacted by trial-related, sociodemographic, and intervention-related variables. The most common reasons for dropouts were technical difficulties (33%), followed by complicated system (31%). Conclusions: Current TH COPD interventions have a pooled acceptance rate of 51%, but this is accompanied by a high dropout rate of 63%. Acceptance and dropout levels in TH clinical trials can be affected by sociodemographic and intervention-related factors. This knowledge enlightens designs for well-accepted future TH clinical trials. PROSPERO registration number CRD4201707854.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8156037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81560372021-05-28 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients’ Acceptance in E-Health Clinical Trials Alghamdi, Saeed M. Rajah, Ahmed M. Al Aldabayan, Yousef S. Aldhahir, Abdulelah M. Alqahtani, Jaber S. Alzahrani, Abdulaziz A. Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Introduction: Telehealth (TH) interventions with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management were introduced in the literature more than 20 years ago with different labeling, but there was no summary for the overall acceptance and dropout rates as well as associated variables. Objective: This review aims to summarize the acceptance and dropout rates used in TH interventions and identify to what extent clinical settings, sociodemographic factors, and intervention factors might impact the overall acceptance and completion rates of TH interventions. Methods: We conducted a systematic search up to April 2021 on CINAHL, PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane, Web of Sciences, and Embase to retrieve randomized and non-randomized control trials that provide TH interventions alone or accompanied with other interventions to individuals with COPD. Results: Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the unweighted average of acceptance and dropout rates for all included studies were 80% and 19%, respectively. A meta-analysis on the pooled difference between the acceptance rates and dropout rates (weighted by the sample size) revealed a significant difference in acceptance and dropout rates among all TH interventions 51% (95% CI 49% to 52; p < 0.001) and 63% (95% CI 60% to 67; p < 0.001), respectively. Analysis revealed that acceptance and dropout rates can be impacted by trial-related, sociodemographic, and intervention-related variables. The most common reasons for dropouts were technical difficulties (33%), followed by complicated system (31%). Conclusions: Current TH COPD interventions have a pooled acceptance rate of 51%, but this is accompanied by a high dropout rate of 63%. Acceptance and dropout levels in TH clinical trials can be affected by sociodemographic and intervention-related factors. This knowledge enlightens designs for well-accepted future TH clinical trials. PROSPERO registration number CRD4201707854. MDPI 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8156037/ /pubmed/34069028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105230 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Alghamdi, Saeed M.
Rajah, Ahmed M. Al
Aldabayan, Yousef S.
Aldhahir, Abdulelah M.
Alqahtani, Jaber S.
Alzahrani, Abdulaziz A.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients’ Acceptance in E-Health Clinical Trials
title Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients’ Acceptance in E-Health Clinical Trials
title_full Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients’ Acceptance in E-Health Clinical Trials
title_fullStr Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients’ Acceptance in E-Health Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients’ Acceptance in E-Health Clinical Trials
title_short Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients’ Acceptance in E-Health Clinical Trials
title_sort chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients’ acceptance in e-health clinical trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069028
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105230
work_keys_str_mv AT alghamdisaeedm chronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsacceptanceinehealthclinicaltrials
AT rajahahmedmal chronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsacceptanceinehealthclinicaltrials
AT aldabayanyousefs chronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsacceptanceinehealthclinicaltrials
AT aldhahirabdulelahm chronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsacceptanceinehealthclinicaltrials
AT alqahtanijabers chronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsacceptanceinehealthclinicaltrials
AT alzahraniabdulaziza chronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsacceptanceinehealthclinicaltrials