Cargando…

Optimization of Manufacturing Parameters and Tensile Specimen Geometry for Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D-Printed PETG

Additive manufacturing provides high design flexibility, but its use is restricted by limited mechanical properties compared to conventional production methods. As technology is still emerging, several approaches exist in the literature for quantifying and improving mechanical properties. In this st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Özen, Arda, Auhl, Dietmar, Völlmecke, Christina, Kiendl, Josef, Abali, Bilen Emek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069230
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14102556
_version_ 1783699429645090816
author Özen, Arda
Auhl, Dietmar
Völlmecke, Christina
Kiendl, Josef
Abali, Bilen Emek
author_facet Özen, Arda
Auhl, Dietmar
Völlmecke, Christina
Kiendl, Josef
Abali, Bilen Emek
author_sort Özen, Arda
collection PubMed
description Additive manufacturing provides high design flexibility, but its use is restricted by limited mechanical properties compared to conventional production methods. As technology is still emerging, several approaches exist in the literature for quantifying and improving mechanical properties. In this study, we investigate characterizing materials’ response of additive manufactured structures, specifically by fused deposition modeling (FDM). A comparative analysis is achieved for four different tensile test specimens for polymers based on ASTM D3039 and ISO 527-2 standards. Comparison of specimen geometries is studied with the aid of computations based on the Finite Element Method (FEM). Uniaxial tensile tests are carried out, after a careful examination of different slicing approaches for 3D printing. We emphasize the effects of the chosen slicer parameters on the position of failures in the specimens and propose a simple formalism for measuring effective mechanical properties of 3D-printed structures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8156372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81563722021-05-28 Optimization of Manufacturing Parameters and Tensile Specimen Geometry for Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D-Printed PETG Özen, Arda Auhl, Dietmar Völlmecke, Christina Kiendl, Josef Abali, Bilen Emek Materials (Basel) Article Additive manufacturing provides high design flexibility, but its use is restricted by limited mechanical properties compared to conventional production methods. As technology is still emerging, several approaches exist in the literature for quantifying and improving mechanical properties. In this study, we investigate characterizing materials’ response of additive manufactured structures, specifically by fused deposition modeling (FDM). A comparative analysis is achieved for four different tensile test specimens for polymers based on ASTM D3039 and ISO 527-2 standards. Comparison of specimen geometries is studied with the aid of computations based on the Finite Element Method (FEM). Uniaxial tensile tests are carried out, after a careful examination of different slicing approaches for 3D printing. We emphasize the effects of the chosen slicer parameters on the position of failures in the specimens and propose a simple formalism for measuring effective mechanical properties of 3D-printed structures. MDPI 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8156372/ /pubmed/34069230 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14102556 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Özen, Arda
Auhl, Dietmar
Völlmecke, Christina
Kiendl, Josef
Abali, Bilen Emek
Optimization of Manufacturing Parameters and Tensile Specimen Geometry for Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D-Printed PETG
title Optimization of Manufacturing Parameters and Tensile Specimen Geometry for Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D-Printed PETG
title_full Optimization of Manufacturing Parameters and Tensile Specimen Geometry for Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D-Printed PETG
title_fullStr Optimization of Manufacturing Parameters and Tensile Specimen Geometry for Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D-Printed PETG
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of Manufacturing Parameters and Tensile Specimen Geometry for Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D-Printed PETG
title_short Optimization of Manufacturing Parameters and Tensile Specimen Geometry for Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D-Printed PETG
title_sort optimization of manufacturing parameters and tensile specimen geometry for fused deposition modeling (fdm) 3d-printed petg
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069230
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14102556
work_keys_str_mv AT ozenarda optimizationofmanufacturingparametersandtensilespecimengeometryforfuseddepositionmodelingfdm3dprintedpetg
AT auhldietmar optimizationofmanufacturingparametersandtensilespecimengeometryforfuseddepositionmodelingfdm3dprintedpetg
AT vollmeckechristina optimizationofmanufacturingparametersandtensilespecimengeometryforfuseddepositionmodelingfdm3dprintedpetg
AT kiendljosef optimizationofmanufacturingparametersandtensilespecimengeometryforfuseddepositionmodelingfdm3dprintedpetg
AT abalibilenemek optimizationofmanufacturingparametersandtensilespecimengeometryforfuseddepositionmodelingfdm3dprintedpetg