Cargando…
Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review
Bicistronic reporter assays have been instrumental for transgene expression, understanding of internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) translation, and identification of novel cap-independent translational elements (CITE). We observed a large methodological variability in the use of bicistronic reporter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34068921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105193 |
_version_ | 1783699489943453696 |
---|---|
author | van den Akker, Guus Gijsbertus Hubert Zacchini, Federico Housmans, Bas Adrianus Catharina van der Vloet, Laura Caron, Marjolein Maria Johanna Montanaro, Lorenzo Welting, Tim Johannes Maria |
author_facet | van den Akker, Guus Gijsbertus Hubert Zacchini, Federico Housmans, Bas Adrianus Catharina van der Vloet, Laura Caron, Marjolein Maria Johanna Montanaro, Lorenzo Welting, Tim Johannes Maria |
author_sort | van den Akker, Guus Gijsbertus Hubert |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bicistronic reporter assays have been instrumental for transgene expression, understanding of internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) translation, and identification of novel cap-independent translational elements (CITE). We observed a large methodological variability in the use of bicistronic reporter assays and data presentation or normalization procedures. Therefore, we systematically searched the literature for bicistronic IRES reporter studies and analyzed methodological details, data visualization, and normalization procedures. Two hundred fifty-seven publications were identified using our search strategy (published 1994–2020). Experimental studies on eukaryotic adherent cell systems and the cell-free translation assay were included for further analysis. We evaluated the following methodological details for 176 full text articles: the bicistronic reporter design, the cell line or type, transfection methods, and time point of analyses post-transfection. For the cell-free translation assay, we focused on methods of in vitro transcription, type of translation lysate, and incubation times and assay temperature. Data can be presented in multiple ways: raw data from individual cistrons, a ratio of the two, or fold changes thereof. In addition, many different control experiments have been suggested when studying IRES-mediated translation. In addition, many different normalization and control experiments have been suggested when studying IRES-mediated translation. Therefore, we also categorized and summarized their use. Our unbiased analyses provide a representative overview of bicistronic IRES reporter use. We identified parameters that were reported inconsistently or incompletely, which could hamper data reproduction and interpretation. On the basis of our analyses, we encourage adhering to a number of practices that should improve transparency of bicistronic reporter data presentation and improve methodological descriptions to facilitate data replication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8156625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81566252021-05-28 Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review van den Akker, Guus Gijsbertus Hubert Zacchini, Federico Housmans, Bas Adrianus Catharina van der Vloet, Laura Caron, Marjolein Maria Johanna Montanaro, Lorenzo Welting, Tim Johannes Maria Int J Mol Sci Review Bicistronic reporter assays have been instrumental for transgene expression, understanding of internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) translation, and identification of novel cap-independent translational elements (CITE). We observed a large methodological variability in the use of bicistronic reporter assays and data presentation or normalization procedures. Therefore, we systematically searched the literature for bicistronic IRES reporter studies and analyzed methodological details, data visualization, and normalization procedures. Two hundred fifty-seven publications were identified using our search strategy (published 1994–2020). Experimental studies on eukaryotic adherent cell systems and the cell-free translation assay were included for further analysis. We evaluated the following methodological details for 176 full text articles: the bicistronic reporter design, the cell line or type, transfection methods, and time point of analyses post-transfection. For the cell-free translation assay, we focused on methods of in vitro transcription, type of translation lysate, and incubation times and assay temperature. Data can be presented in multiple ways: raw data from individual cistrons, a ratio of the two, or fold changes thereof. In addition, many different control experiments have been suggested when studying IRES-mediated translation. In addition, many different normalization and control experiments have been suggested when studying IRES-mediated translation. Therefore, we also categorized and summarized their use. Our unbiased analyses provide a representative overview of bicistronic IRES reporter use. We identified parameters that were reported inconsistently or incompletely, which could hamper data reproduction and interpretation. On the basis of our analyses, we encourage adhering to a number of practices that should improve transparency of bicistronic reporter data presentation and improve methodological descriptions to facilitate data replication. MDPI 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8156625/ /pubmed/34068921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105193 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review van den Akker, Guus Gijsbertus Hubert Zacchini, Federico Housmans, Bas Adrianus Catharina van der Vloet, Laura Caron, Marjolein Maria Johanna Montanaro, Lorenzo Welting, Tim Johannes Maria Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review |
title | Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | current practice in bicistronic ires reporter use: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34068921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenakkerguusgijsbertushubert currentpracticeinbicistroniciresreporteruseasystematicreview AT zacchinifederico currentpracticeinbicistroniciresreporteruseasystematicreview AT housmansbasadrianuscatharina currentpracticeinbicistroniciresreporteruseasystematicreview AT vandervloetlaura currentpracticeinbicistroniciresreporteruseasystematicreview AT caronmarjoleinmariajohanna currentpracticeinbicistroniciresreporteruseasystematicreview AT montanarolorenzo currentpracticeinbicistroniciresreporteruseasystematicreview AT weltingtimjohannesmaria currentpracticeinbicistroniciresreporteruseasystematicreview |