Cargando…

Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review

Bicistronic reporter assays have been instrumental for transgene expression, understanding of internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) translation, and identification of novel cap-independent translational elements (CITE). We observed a large methodological variability in the use of bicistronic reporter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Akker, Guus Gijsbertus Hubert, Zacchini, Federico, Housmans, Bas Adrianus Catharina, van der Vloet, Laura, Caron, Marjolein Maria Johanna, Montanaro, Lorenzo, Welting, Tim Johannes Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34068921
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105193
_version_ 1783699489943453696
author van den Akker, Guus Gijsbertus Hubert
Zacchini, Federico
Housmans, Bas Adrianus Catharina
van der Vloet, Laura
Caron, Marjolein Maria Johanna
Montanaro, Lorenzo
Welting, Tim Johannes Maria
author_facet van den Akker, Guus Gijsbertus Hubert
Zacchini, Federico
Housmans, Bas Adrianus Catharina
van der Vloet, Laura
Caron, Marjolein Maria Johanna
Montanaro, Lorenzo
Welting, Tim Johannes Maria
author_sort van den Akker, Guus Gijsbertus Hubert
collection PubMed
description Bicistronic reporter assays have been instrumental for transgene expression, understanding of internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) translation, and identification of novel cap-independent translational elements (CITE). We observed a large methodological variability in the use of bicistronic reporter assays and data presentation or normalization procedures. Therefore, we systematically searched the literature for bicistronic IRES reporter studies and analyzed methodological details, data visualization, and normalization procedures. Two hundred fifty-seven publications were identified using our search strategy (published 1994–2020). Experimental studies on eukaryotic adherent cell systems and the cell-free translation assay were included for further analysis. We evaluated the following methodological details for 176 full text articles: the bicistronic reporter design, the cell line or type, transfection methods, and time point of analyses post-transfection. For the cell-free translation assay, we focused on methods of in vitro transcription, type of translation lysate, and incubation times and assay temperature. Data can be presented in multiple ways: raw data from individual cistrons, a ratio of the two, or fold changes thereof. In addition, many different control experiments have been suggested when studying IRES-mediated translation. In addition, many different normalization and control experiments have been suggested when studying IRES-mediated translation. Therefore, we also categorized and summarized their use. Our unbiased analyses provide a representative overview of bicistronic IRES reporter use. We identified parameters that were reported inconsistently or incompletely, which could hamper data reproduction and interpretation. On the basis of our analyses, we encourage adhering to a number of practices that should improve transparency of bicistronic reporter data presentation and improve methodological descriptions to facilitate data replication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8156625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81566252021-05-28 Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review van den Akker, Guus Gijsbertus Hubert Zacchini, Federico Housmans, Bas Adrianus Catharina van der Vloet, Laura Caron, Marjolein Maria Johanna Montanaro, Lorenzo Welting, Tim Johannes Maria Int J Mol Sci Review Bicistronic reporter assays have been instrumental for transgene expression, understanding of internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) translation, and identification of novel cap-independent translational elements (CITE). We observed a large methodological variability in the use of bicistronic reporter assays and data presentation or normalization procedures. Therefore, we systematically searched the literature for bicistronic IRES reporter studies and analyzed methodological details, data visualization, and normalization procedures. Two hundred fifty-seven publications were identified using our search strategy (published 1994–2020). Experimental studies on eukaryotic adherent cell systems and the cell-free translation assay were included for further analysis. We evaluated the following methodological details for 176 full text articles: the bicistronic reporter design, the cell line or type, transfection methods, and time point of analyses post-transfection. For the cell-free translation assay, we focused on methods of in vitro transcription, type of translation lysate, and incubation times and assay temperature. Data can be presented in multiple ways: raw data from individual cistrons, a ratio of the two, or fold changes thereof. In addition, many different control experiments have been suggested when studying IRES-mediated translation. In addition, many different normalization and control experiments have been suggested when studying IRES-mediated translation. Therefore, we also categorized and summarized their use. Our unbiased analyses provide a representative overview of bicistronic IRES reporter use. We identified parameters that were reported inconsistently or incompletely, which could hamper data reproduction and interpretation. On the basis of our analyses, we encourage adhering to a number of practices that should improve transparency of bicistronic reporter data presentation and improve methodological descriptions to facilitate data replication. MDPI 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8156625/ /pubmed/34068921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105193 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
van den Akker, Guus Gijsbertus Hubert
Zacchini, Federico
Housmans, Bas Adrianus Catharina
van der Vloet, Laura
Caron, Marjolein Maria Johanna
Montanaro, Lorenzo
Welting, Tim Johannes Maria
Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review
title Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review
title_full Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review
title_short Current Practice in Bicistronic IRES Reporter Use: A Systematic Review
title_sort current practice in bicistronic ires reporter use: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34068921
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105193
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenakkerguusgijsbertushubert currentpracticeinbicistroniciresreporteruseasystematicreview
AT zacchinifederico currentpracticeinbicistroniciresreporteruseasystematicreview
AT housmansbasadrianuscatharina currentpracticeinbicistroniciresreporteruseasystematicreview
AT vandervloetlaura currentpracticeinbicistroniciresreporteruseasystematicreview
AT caronmarjoleinmariajohanna currentpracticeinbicistroniciresreporteruseasystematicreview
AT montanarolorenzo currentpracticeinbicistroniciresreporteruseasystematicreview
AT weltingtimjohannesmaria currentpracticeinbicistroniciresreporteruseasystematicreview