Cargando…

A Pilot Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing a Short-Term Perioperative Prophylaxis Regimen to a Long-Term Standard Protocol in Equine Colic Surgery

Background: For surgical interventions classified as clean or clean-contaminated, including laparotomy, guidelines in human and veterinary medicine recommend a short-term perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP). In equine colic surgery, however, PAP commonly exceeds 24 h. Objectives: The aim of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stöckle, Sabita Diana, Kannapin, Dania A., Kauter, Anne M. L., Lübke-Becker, Antina, Walther, Birgit, Merle, Roswitha, Gehlen, Heidrun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34065712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050587
_version_ 1783699495769341952
author Stöckle, Sabita Diana
Kannapin, Dania A.
Kauter, Anne M. L.
Lübke-Becker, Antina
Walther, Birgit
Merle, Roswitha
Gehlen, Heidrun
author_facet Stöckle, Sabita Diana
Kannapin, Dania A.
Kauter, Anne M. L.
Lübke-Becker, Antina
Walther, Birgit
Merle, Roswitha
Gehlen, Heidrun
author_sort Stöckle, Sabita Diana
collection PubMed
description Background: For surgical interventions classified as clean or clean-contaminated, including laparotomy, guidelines in human and veterinary medicine recommend a short-term perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP). In equine colic surgery, however, PAP commonly exceeds 24 h. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare a single-shot to a 5-day lasting PAP considering surgical site infections (SSI) and other adverse effects probably associated with the particular antimicrobial regimen. Study design: The study was designed as a randomised non-inferiority pilot study including horses subjected to colic surgery while receiving one of two distinct PAP regimens. Methods: All horses (n = 67) included in the study received the standard physical examination before and after surgery. Colic surgery was performed according to the current standard of the clinic. Horses were randomly assigned to two groups, receiving either the “single-shot” or the “5-day lasting” antibiotic prophylaxis. The “single-shot” group (n = 30) received penicillin and gentamicin only once before and, if needed, during surgery, whereas the “5-day lasting” group (n = 37) received antibiotics for five days. In addition to the standard laboratory examinations, serum amyloid A and fibrinogen were determined preoperatively and during five days after surgery. SSI, postoperative colitis and haemolytic anaemia were classified as postoperative complications potentially related to antibiotic use. Results: The outcome of this preliminary non-inferiority clinical trial showed that the occurrence of postoperative adverse events (i.e., SSI, postoperative colitis and haemolytic anaemia) lacked significant differences between the study groups. Main limitations: The main limitations of this study are the limited group sizes and our inability to blind the study. Conclusions: Single-shot PAP seems to be an alternative approach considering the 5-day lasting protocol commonly used in equine abdominal surgery. However, a proper hygiene management together with a close clinical and laboratory monitoring of the equine patient is indispensable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8156649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81566492021-05-28 A Pilot Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing a Short-Term Perioperative Prophylaxis Regimen to a Long-Term Standard Protocol in Equine Colic Surgery Stöckle, Sabita Diana Kannapin, Dania A. Kauter, Anne M. L. Lübke-Becker, Antina Walther, Birgit Merle, Roswitha Gehlen, Heidrun Antibiotics (Basel) Article Background: For surgical interventions classified as clean or clean-contaminated, including laparotomy, guidelines in human and veterinary medicine recommend a short-term perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP). In equine colic surgery, however, PAP commonly exceeds 24 h. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare a single-shot to a 5-day lasting PAP considering surgical site infections (SSI) and other adverse effects probably associated with the particular antimicrobial regimen. Study design: The study was designed as a randomised non-inferiority pilot study including horses subjected to colic surgery while receiving one of two distinct PAP regimens. Methods: All horses (n = 67) included in the study received the standard physical examination before and after surgery. Colic surgery was performed according to the current standard of the clinic. Horses were randomly assigned to two groups, receiving either the “single-shot” or the “5-day lasting” antibiotic prophylaxis. The “single-shot” group (n = 30) received penicillin and gentamicin only once before and, if needed, during surgery, whereas the “5-day lasting” group (n = 37) received antibiotics for five days. In addition to the standard laboratory examinations, serum amyloid A and fibrinogen were determined preoperatively and during five days after surgery. SSI, postoperative colitis and haemolytic anaemia were classified as postoperative complications potentially related to antibiotic use. Results: The outcome of this preliminary non-inferiority clinical trial showed that the occurrence of postoperative adverse events (i.e., SSI, postoperative colitis and haemolytic anaemia) lacked significant differences between the study groups. Main limitations: The main limitations of this study are the limited group sizes and our inability to blind the study. Conclusions: Single-shot PAP seems to be an alternative approach considering the 5-day lasting protocol commonly used in equine abdominal surgery. However, a proper hygiene management together with a close clinical and laboratory monitoring of the equine patient is indispensable. MDPI 2021-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8156649/ /pubmed/34065712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050587 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stöckle, Sabita Diana
Kannapin, Dania A.
Kauter, Anne M. L.
Lübke-Becker, Antina
Walther, Birgit
Merle, Roswitha
Gehlen, Heidrun
A Pilot Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing a Short-Term Perioperative Prophylaxis Regimen to a Long-Term Standard Protocol in Equine Colic Surgery
title A Pilot Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing a Short-Term Perioperative Prophylaxis Regimen to a Long-Term Standard Protocol in Equine Colic Surgery
title_full A Pilot Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing a Short-Term Perioperative Prophylaxis Regimen to a Long-Term Standard Protocol in Equine Colic Surgery
title_fullStr A Pilot Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing a Short-Term Perioperative Prophylaxis Regimen to a Long-Term Standard Protocol in Equine Colic Surgery
title_full_unstemmed A Pilot Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing a Short-Term Perioperative Prophylaxis Regimen to a Long-Term Standard Protocol in Equine Colic Surgery
title_short A Pilot Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing a Short-Term Perioperative Prophylaxis Regimen to a Long-Term Standard Protocol in Equine Colic Surgery
title_sort pilot randomised clinical trial comparing a short-term perioperative prophylaxis regimen to a long-term standard protocol in equine colic surgery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34065712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050587
work_keys_str_mv AT stocklesabitadiana apilotrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingashorttermperioperativeprophylaxisregimentoalongtermstandardprotocolinequinecolicsurgery
AT kannapindaniaa apilotrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingashorttermperioperativeprophylaxisregimentoalongtermstandardprotocolinequinecolicsurgery
AT kauteranneml apilotrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingashorttermperioperativeprophylaxisregimentoalongtermstandardprotocolinequinecolicsurgery
AT lubkebeckerantina apilotrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingashorttermperioperativeprophylaxisregimentoalongtermstandardprotocolinequinecolicsurgery
AT waltherbirgit apilotrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingashorttermperioperativeprophylaxisregimentoalongtermstandardprotocolinequinecolicsurgery
AT merleroswitha apilotrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingashorttermperioperativeprophylaxisregimentoalongtermstandardprotocolinequinecolicsurgery
AT gehlenheidrun apilotrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingashorttermperioperativeprophylaxisregimentoalongtermstandardprotocolinequinecolicsurgery
AT stocklesabitadiana pilotrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingashorttermperioperativeprophylaxisregimentoalongtermstandardprotocolinequinecolicsurgery
AT kannapindaniaa pilotrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingashorttermperioperativeprophylaxisregimentoalongtermstandardprotocolinequinecolicsurgery
AT kauteranneml pilotrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingashorttermperioperativeprophylaxisregimentoalongtermstandardprotocolinequinecolicsurgery
AT lubkebeckerantina pilotrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingashorttermperioperativeprophylaxisregimentoalongtermstandardprotocolinequinecolicsurgery
AT waltherbirgit pilotrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingashorttermperioperativeprophylaxisregimentoalongtermstandardprotocolinequinecolicsurgery
AT merleroswitha pilotrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingashorttermperioperativeprophylaxisregimentoalongtermstandardprotocolinequinecolicsurgery
AT gehlenheidrun pilotrandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingashorttermperioperativeprophylaxisregimentoalongtermstandardprotocolinequinecolicsurgery