Cargando…
Foundational Statistical Principles in Medical Research: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value
Sensitivity, which denotes the proportion of subjects correctly given a positive assignment out of all subjects who are actually positive for the outcome, indicates how well a test can classify subjects who truly have the outcome of interest. Specificity, which denotes the proportion of subjects cor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34065637 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57050503 |
_version_ | 1783699539705724928 |
---|---|
author | Monaghan, Thomas F. Rahman, Syed N. Agudelo, Christina W. Wein, Alan J. Lazar, Jason M. Everaert, Karel Dmochowski, Roger R. |
author_facet | Monaghan, Thomas F. Rahman, Syed N. Agudelo, Christina W. Wein, Alan J. Lazar, Jason M. Everaert, Karel Dmochowski, Roger R. |
author_sort | Monaghan, Thomas F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sensitivity, which denotes the proportion of subjects correctly given a positive assignment out of all subjects who are actually positive for the outcome, indicates how well a test can classify subjects who truly have the outcome of interest. Specificity, which denotes the proportion of subjects correctly given a negative assignment out of all subjects who are actually negative for the outcome, indicates how well a test can classify subjects who truly do not have the outcome of interest. Positive predictive value reflects the proportion of subjects with a positive test result who truly have the outcome of interest. Negative predictive value reflects the proportion of subjects with a negative test result who truly do not have the outcome of interest. Sensitivity and specificity are inversely related, wherein one increases as the other decreases, but are generally considered stable for a given test, whereas positive and negative predictive values do inherently vary with pre-test probability (e.g., changes in population disease prevalence). This article will further detail the concepts of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values using a recent real-world example from the medical literature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8156826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81568262021-05-28 Foundational Statistical Principles in Medical Research: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value Monaghan, Thomas F. Rahman, Syed N. Agudelo, Christina W. Wein, Alan J. Lazar, Jason M. Everaert, Karel Dmochowski, Roger R. Medicina (Kaunas) Review Sensitivity, which denotes the proportion of subjects correctly given a positive assignment out of all subjects who are actually positive for the outcome, indicates how well a test can classify subjects who truly have the outcome of interest. Specificity, which denotes the proportion of subjects correctly given a negative assignment out of all subjects who are actually negative for the outcome, indicates how well a test can classify subjects who truly do not have the outcome of interest. Positive predictive value reflects the proportion of subjects with a positive test result who truly have the outcome of interest. Negative predictive value reflects the proportion of subjects with a negative test result who truly do not have the outcome of interest. Sensitivity and specificity are inversely related, wherein one increases as the other decreases, but are generally considered stable for a given test, whereas positive and negative predictive values do inherently vary with pre-test probability (e.g., changes in population disease prevalence). This article will further detail the concepts of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values using a recent real-world example from the medical literature. MDPI 2021-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8156826/ /pubmed/34065637 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57050503 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Monaghan, Thomas F. Rahman, Syed N. Agudelo, Christina W. Wein, Alan J. Lazar, Jason M. Everaert, Karel Dmochowski, Roger R. Foundational Statistical Principles in Medical Research: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value |
title | Foundational Statistical Principles in Medical Research: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value |
title_full | Foundational Statistical Principles in Medical Research: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value |
title_fullStr | Foundational Statistical Principles in Medical Research: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value |
title_full_unstemmed | Foundational Statistical Principles in Medical Research: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value |
title_short | Foundational Statistical Principles in Medical Research: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value |
title_sort | foundational statistical principles in medical research: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34065637 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57050503 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monaghanthomasf foundationalstatisticalprinciplesinmedicalresearchsensitivityspecificitypositivepredictivevalueandnegativepredictivevalue AT rahmansyedn foundationalstatisticalprinciplesinmedicalresearchsensitivityspecificitypositivepredictivevalueandnegativepredictivevalue AT agudelochristinaw foundationalstatisticalprinciplesinmedicalresearchsensitivityspecificitypositivepredictivevalueandnegativepredictivevalue AT weinalanj foundationalstatisticalprinciplesinmedicalresearchsensitivityspecificitypositivepredictivevalueandnegativepredictivevalue AT lazarjasonm foundationalstatisticalprinciplesinmedicalresearchsensitivityspecificitypositivepredictivevalueandnegativepredictivevalue AT everaertkarel foundationalstatisticalprinciplesinmedicalresearchsensitivityspecificitypositivepredictivevalueandnegativepredictivevalue AT dmochowskirogerr foundationalstatisticalprinciplesinmedicalresearchsensitivityspecificitypositivepredictivevalueandnegativepredictivevalue |