Radial Access for Coronary Angiography Carries Fewer Complications Compared with Femoral Access: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background and Aim: In patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), the benefits associated with radial access compared with the femoral access approach remain controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the short-term eviden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bajraktari, Gani, Rexhaj, Zarife, Elezi, Shpend, Zhubi-Bakija, Fjolla, Bajraktari, Artan, Bytyçi, Ibadete, Batalli, Arlind, Henein, Michael Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Review
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34067672
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102163

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34067672
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102163

Ejemplares similares