Cargando…
Lessons from Comparison of Hypoxia Signaling in Plants and Mammals
Hypoxia is an important stress for organisms, including plants and mammals. In plants, hypoxia can be the consequence of flooding and causes important crop losses worldwide. In mammals, hypoxia stress may be the result of pathological conditions. Understanding the regulation of responses to hypoxia...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34067566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10050993 |
_version_ | 1783699633377116160 |
---|---|
author | Doorly, Catherine M. Graciet, Emmanuelle |
author_facet | Doorly, Catherine M. Graciet, Emmanuelle |
author_sort | Doorly, Catherine M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hypoxia is an important stress for organisms, including plants and mammals. In plants, hypoxia can be the consequence of flooding and causes important crop losses worldwide. In mammals, hypoxia stress may be the result of pathological conditions. Understanding the regulation of responses to hypoxia offers insights into novel approaches for crop improvement, particularly for the development of flooding-tolerant crops and for producing better therapeutics for hypoxia-related diseases such as inflammation and cancer. Despite their evolutionary distance, plants and mammals deploy strikingly similar mechanisms to sense and respond to the different aspects of hypoxia-related stress, including low oxygen levels and the resulting energy crisis, nutrient depletion, and oxidative stress. Over the last two decades, the ubiquitin/proteasome system and the ubiquitin-like protein SUMO have been identified as key regulators that act in concert to regulate core aspects of responses to hypoxia in plants and mammals. Here, we review ubiquitin and SUMO-dependent mechanisms underlying the regulation of hypoxia response in plants and mammals. By comparing and contrasting these mechanisms in plants and mammals, this review seeks to pinpoint conceptually similar mechanisms but also highlight future avenues of research at the junction between different fields of research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8157222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81572222021-05-28 Lessons from Comparison of Hypoxia Signaling in Plants and Mammals Doorly, Catherine M. Graciet, Emmanuelle Plants (Basel) Review Hypoxia is an important stress for organisms, including plants and mammals. In plants, hypoxia can be the consequence of flooding and causes important crop losses worldwide. In mammals, hypoxia stress may be the result of pathological conditions. Understanding the regulation of responses to hypoxia offers insights into novel approaches for crop improvement, particularly for the development of flooding-tolerant crops and for producing better therapeutics for hypoxia-related diseases such as inflammation and cancer. Despite their evolutionary distance, plants and mammals deploy strikingly similar mechanisms to sense and respond to the different aspects of hypoxia-related stress, including low oxygen levels and the resulting energy crisis, nutrient depletion, and oxidative stress. Over the last two decades, the ubiquitin/proteasome system and the ubiquitin-like protein SUMO have been identified as key regulators that act in concert to regulate core aspects of responses to hypoxia in plants and mammals. Here, we review ubiquitin and SUMO-dependent mechanisms underlying the regulation of hypoxia response in plants and mammals. By comparing and contrasting these mechanisms in plants and mammals, this review seeks to pinpoint conceptually similar mechanisms but also highlight future avenues of research at the junction between different fields of research. MDPI 2021-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8157222/ /pubmed/34067566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10050993 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Doorly, Catherine M. Graciet, Emmanuelle Lessons from Comparison of Hypoxia Signaling in Plants and Mammals |
title | Lessons from Comparison of Hypoxia Signaling in Plants and Mammals |
title_full | Lessons from Comparison of Hypoxia Signaling in Plants and Mammals |
title_fullStr | Lessons from Comparison of Hypoxia Signaling in Plants and Mammals |
title_full_unstemmed | Lessons from Comparison of Hypoxia Signaling in Plants and Mammals |
title_short | Lessons from Comparison of Hypoxia Signaling in Plants and Mammals |
title_sort | lessons from comparison of hypoxia signaling in plants and mammals |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34067566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10050993 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doorlycatherinem lessonsfromcomparisonofhypoxiasignalinginplantsandmammals AT gracietemmanuelle lessonsfromcomparisonofhypoxiasignalinginplantsandmammals |