Cargando…

Lessons from Comparison of Hypoxia Signaling in Plants and Mammals

Hypoxia is an important stress for organisms, including plants and mammals. In plants, hypoxia can be the consequence of flooding and causes important crop losses worldwide. In mammals, hypoxia stress may be the result of pathological conditions. Understanding the regulation of responses to hypoxia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doorly, Catherine M., Graciet, Emmanuelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34067566
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10050993
_version_ 1783699633377116160
author Doorly, Catherine M.
Graciet, Emmanuelle
author_facet Doorly, Catherine M.
Graciet, Emmanuelle
author_sort Doorly, Catherine M.
collection PubMed
description Hypoxia is an important stress for organisms, including plants and mammals. In plants, hypoxia can be the consequence of flooding and causes important crop losses worldwide. In mammals, hypoxia stress may be the result of pathological conditions. Understanding the regulation of responses to hypoxia offers insights into novel approaches for crop improvement, particularly for the development of flooding-tolerant crops and for producing better therapeutics for hypoxia-related diseases such as inflammation and cancer. Despite their evolutionary distance, plants and mammals deploy strikingly similar mechanisms to sense and respond to the different aspects of hypoxia-related stress, including low oxygen levels and the resulting energy crisis, nutrient depletion, and oxidative stress. Over the last two decades, the ubiquitin/proteasome system and the ubiquitin-like protein SUMO have been identified as key regulators that act in concert to regulate core aspects of responses to hypoxia in plants and mammals. Here, we review ubiquitin and SUMO-dependent mechanisms underlying the regulation of hypoxia response in plants and mammals. By comparing and contrasting these mechanisms in plants and mammals, this review seeks to pinpoint conceptually similar mechanisms but also highlight future avenues of research at the junction between different fields of research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8157222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81572222021-05-28 Lessons from Comparison of Hypoxia Signaling in Plants and Mammals Doorly, Catherine M. Graciet, Emmanuelle Plants (Basel) Review Hypoxia is an important stress for organisms, including plants and mammals. In plants, hypoxia can be the consequence of flooding and causes important crop losses worldwide. In mammals, hypoxia stress may be the result of pathological conditions. Understanding the regulation of responses to hypoxia offers insights into novel approaches for crop improvement, particularly for the development of flooding-tolerant crops and for producing better therapeutics for hypoxia-related diseases such as inflammation and cancer. Despite their evolutionary distance, plants and mammals deploy strikingly similar mechanisms to sense and respond to the different aspects of hypoxia-related stress, including low oxygen levels and the resulting energy crisis, nutrient depletion, and oxidative stress. Over the last two decades, the ubiquitin/proteasome system and the ubiquitin-like protein SUMO have been identified as key regulators that act in concert to regulate core aspects of responses to hypoxia in plants and mammals. Here, we review ubiquitin and SUMO-dependent mechanisms underlying the regulation of hypoxia response in plants and mammals. By comparing and contrasting these mechanisms in plants and mammals, this review seeks to pinpoint conceptually similar mechanisms but also highlight future avenues of research at the junction between different fields of research. MDPI 2021-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8157222/ /pubmed/34067566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10050993 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Doorly, Catherine M.
Graciet, Emmanuelle
Lessons from Comparison of Hypoxia Signaling in Plants and Mammals
title Lessons from Comparison of Hypoxia Signaling in Plants and Mammals
title_full Lessons from Comparison of Hypoxia Signaling in Plants and Mammals
title_fullStr Lessons from Comparison of Hypoxia Signaling in Plants and Mammals
title_full_unstemmed Lessons from Comparison of Hypoxia Signaling in Plants and Mammals
title_short Lessons from Comparison of Hypoxia Signaling in Plants and Mammals
title_sort lessons from comparison of hypoxia signaling in plants and mammals
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34067566
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10050993
work_keys_str_mv AT doorlycatherinem lessonsfromcomparisonofhypoxiasignalinginplantsandmammals
AT gracietemmanuelle lessonsfromcomparisonofhypoxiasignalinginplantsandmammals