Cargando…
Benchmarks for interpretation of QSAR models
Interpretation of QSAR models is useful to understand the complex nature of biological or physicochemical processes, guide structural optimization or perform knowledge-based validation of QSAR models. Highly predictive models are usually complex and their interpretation is non-trivial. This is parti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34039411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00519-x |
_version_ | 1783699676890923008 |
---|---|
author | Matveieva, Mariia Polishchuk, Pavel |
author_facet | Matveieva, Mariia Polishchuk, Pavel |
author_sort | Matveieva, Mariia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Interpretation of QSAR models is useful to understand the complex nature of biological or physicochemical processes, guide structural optimization or perform knowledge-based validation of QSAR models. Highly predictive models are usually complex and their interpretation is non-trivial. This is particularly true for modern neural networks. Various approaches to interpretation of these models exist. However, it is difficult to evaluate and compare performance and applicability of these ever-emerging methods. Herein, we developed several benchmark data sets with end-points determined by pre-defined patterns. These data sets are purposed for evaluation of the ability of interpretation approaches to retrieve these patterns. They represent tasks with different complexity levels: from simple atom-based additive properties to pharmacophore hypothesis. We proposed several quantitative metrics of interpretation performance. Applicability of benchmarks and metrics was demonstrated on a set of conventional models and end-to-end graph convolutional neural networks, interpreted by the previously suggested universal ML-agnostic approach for structural interpretation. We anticipate these benchmarks to be useful in evaluation of new interpretation approaches and investigation of decision making of complex “black box” models. [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13321-021-00519-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8157407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81574072021-05-28 Benchmarks for interpretation of QSAR models Matveieva, Mariia Polishchuk, Pavel J Cheminform Research Article Interpretation of QSAR models is useful to understand the complex nature of biological or physicochemical processes, guide structural optimization or perform knowledge-based validation of QSAR models. Highly predictive models are usually complex and their interpretation is non-trivial. This is particularly true for modern neural networks. Various approaches to interpretation of these models exist. However, it is difficult to evaluate and compare performance and applicability of these ever-emerging methods. Herein, we developed several benchmark data sets with end-points determined by pre-defined patterns. These data sets are purposed for evaluation of the ability of interpretation approaches to retrieve these patterns. They represent tasks with different complexity levels: from simple atom-based additive properties to pharmacophore hypothesis. We proposed several quantitative metrics of interpretation performance. Applicability of benchmarks and metrics was demonstrated on a set of conventional models and end-to-end graph convolutional neural networks, interpreted by the previously suggested universal ML-agnostic approach for structural interpretation. We anticipate these benchmarks to be useful in evaluation of new interpretation approaches and investigation of decision making of complex “black box” models. [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13321-021-00519-x. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8157407/ /pubmed/34039411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00519-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Matveieva, Mariia Polishchuk, Pavel Benchmarks for interpretation of QSAR models |
title | Benchmarks for interpretation of QSAR models |
title_full | Benchmarks for interpretation of QSAR models |
title_fullStr | Benchmarks for interpretation of QSAR models |
title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarks for interpretation of QSAR models |
title_short | Benchmarks for interpretation of QSAR models |
title_sort | benchmarks for interpretation of qsar models |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34039411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00519-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matveievamariia benchmarksforinterpretationofqsarmodels AT polishchukpavel benchmarksforinterpretationofqsarmodels |