Cargando…
An analysis of COVID-19 vaccine sentiments and opinions on Twitter
OBJECTIVE: We identified public sentiments and opinions toward the COVID-19 vaccines based on the content of Twitter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrieved 4,552,652 publicly available tweets posted within the timeline of January 2020 to January 2021. Following extraction, we identified vaccine sentim...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34052407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.059 |
_version_ | 1783699694945304576 |
---|---|
author | Yousefinaghani, Samira Dara, Rozita Mubareka, Samira Papadopoulos, Andrew Sharif, Shayan |
author_facet | Yousefinaghani, Samira Dara, Rozita Mubareka, Samira Papadopoulos, Andrew Sharif, Shayan |
author_sort | Yousefinaghani, Samira |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We identified public sentiments and opinions toward the COVID-19 vaccines based on the content of Twitter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrieved 4,552,652 publicly available tweets posted within the timeline of January 2020 to January 2021. Following extraction, we identified vaccine sentiments and opinions of tweets and compared their progression by time, geographical distribution, main themes, keywords, posts engagement metrics and accounts characteristics. RESULTS: We found a slight difference in the prevalence of positive and negative sentiments, with positive being the dominant polarity and having higher engagements. The amount of discussion on vaccine rejection and hesitancy was more than interest in vaccines during the course of the study, but the pattern was different in various countries. We found the accounts producing vaccine opposition content were partly Twitter bots or political activists while well-known individuals and organizations generated the content in favour of vaccination. CONCLUSION: Understanding sentiments and opinions toward vaccination using Twitter may help public health agencies to increase positive messaging and eliminate opposing messages in order to enhance vaccine uptake. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8157498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81574982021-05-28 An analysis of COVID-19 vaccine sentiments and opinions on Twitter Yousefinaghani, Samira Dara, Rozita Mubareka, Samira Papadopoulos, Andrew Sharif, Shayan Int J Infect Dis Article OBJECTIVE: We identified public sentiments and opinions toward the COVID-19 vaccines based on the content of Twitter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrieved 4,552,652 publicly available tweets posted within the timeline of January 2020 to January 2021. Following extraction, we identified vaccine sentiments and opinions of tweets and compared their progression by time, geographical distribution, main themes, keywords, posts engagement metrics and accounts characteristics. RESULTS: We found a slight difference in the prevalence of positive and negative sentiments, with positive being the dominant polarity and having higher engagements. The amount of discussion on vaccine rejection and hesitancy was more than interest in vaccines during the course of the study, but the pattern was different in various countries. We found the accounts producing vaccine opposition content were partly Twitter bots or political activists while well-known individuals and organizations generated the content in favour of vaccination. CONCLUSION: Understanding sentiments and opinions toward vaccination using Twitter may help public health agencies to increase positive messaging and eliminate opposing messages in order to enhance vaccine uptake. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2021-07 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8157498/ /pubmed/34052407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.059 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Yousefinaghani, Samira Dara, Rozita Mubareka, Samira Papadopoulos, Andrew Sharif, Shayan An analysis of COVID-19 vaccine sentiments and opinions on Twitter |
title | An analysis of COVID-19 vaccine sentiments and opinions on Twitter |
title_full | An analysis of COVID-19 vaccine sentiments and opinions on Twitter |
title_fullStr | An analysis of COVID-19 vaccine sentiments and opinions on Twitter |
title_full_unstemmed | An analysis of COVID-19 vaccine sentiments and opinions on Twitter |
title_short | An analysis of COVID-19 vaccine sentiments and opinions on Twitter |
title_sort | analysis of covid-19 vaccine sentiments and opinions on twitter |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34052407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.059 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yousefinaghanisamira ananalysisofcovid19vaccinesentimentsandopinionsontwitter AT dararozita ananalysisofcovid19vaccinesentimentsandopinionsontwitter AT mubarekasamira ananalysisofcovid19vaccinesentimentsandopinionsontwitter AT papadopoulosandrew ananalysisofcovid19vaccinesentimentsandopinionsontwitter AT sharifshayan ananalysisofcovid19vaccinesentimentsandopinionsontwitter AT yousefinaghanisamira analysisofcovid19vaccinesentimentsandopinionsontwitter AT dararozita analysisofcovid19vaccinesentimentsandopinionsontwitter AT mubarekasamira analysisofcovid19vaccinesentimentsandopinionsontwitter AT papadopoulosandrew analysisofcovid19vaccinesentimentsandopinionsontwitter AT sharifshayan analysisofcovid19vaccinesentimentsandopinionsontwitter |