Cargando…

Validation of perceived physical fatigability using the simplified-Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale

BACKGROUND: The Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) was developed to capture fatigue and demand in a single tool, filling a gap that no validated questionnaire existed to measure perceived fatigability. Since fatigability is a more sensitive measure of a person’s susceptibility to fatigue, we valida...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Yixin, Zhang, Hangming, Xu, Weihao, Zhao, Ming, Liu, Juan, Wu, Linna, Zou, Lin, Zuo, Jing, Liu, Yunxia, Fan, Li, Bair, Woei-Nan, Qiao, Yujia (Susanna), Glynn, Nancy W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34039260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02275-x
_version_ 1783699733604204544
author Hu, Yixin
Zhang, Hangming
Xu, Weihao
Zhao, Ming
Liu, Juan
Wu, Linna
Zou, Lin
Zuo, Jing
Liu, Yunxia
Fan, Li
Bair, Woei-Nan
Qiao, Yujia (Susanna)
Glynn, Nancy W.
author_facet Hu, Yixin
Zhang, Hangming
Xu, Weihao
Zhao, Ming
Liu, Juan
Wu, Linna
Zou, Lin
Zuo, Jing
Liu, Yunxia
Fan, Li
Bair, Woei-Nan
Qiao, Yujia (Susanna)
Glynn, Nancy W.
author_sort Hu, Yixin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) was developed to capture fatigue and demand in a single tool, filling a gap that no validated questionnaire existed to measure perceived fatigability. Since fatigability is a more sensitive measure of a person’s susceptibility to fatigue, we validated the simplified-Chinese version of the PFS among Chinese community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in an urban community in Beijing between November 2018 and July 2019. The PFS was translated into simplified-Chinese by the translation, retro-translation method. Internal consistency of the Physical subscale of the PFS was evaluated by Cronbach’s alpha. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were evaluated against physical performance measures (i.e., Short Physical Performance Battery & Timed Up and Go Test) and daily living performance (i.e., Barthel Index & Instrumental activity of daily living). RESULTS: Our study included 457 participants, including 182 men (39.8%) and 275 women (60.2%). The age range of the included participants was 61–96 years (mean = 84.8 years, SD = 5.8 years). The simplified-Chinese version of PFS Physical scores showed strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.81). Higher PFS Physical scores were associated with worse physical performance, and daily living performance (|correlation coefficient| range: 0.36–0.56, p < .001). Age- and sex-adjusted PFS Physical scores had moderate to good overall discrimination for correctly classifying people by their physical performance and daily living performance (AUCs range 0.70–0.87, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The PFS simplified-Chinese version is a valid instrument to assess perceived physical fatigability in Chinese-speaking older adults with good convergent validity. Thus, the PFS, with low cost and greater feasibility, is a desired tool to measure fatigability in large population studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8157666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81576662021-05-28 Validation of perceived physical fatigability using the simplified-Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale Hu, Yixin Zhang, Hangming Xu, Weihao Zhao, Ming Liu, Juan Wu, Linna Zou, Lin Zuo, Jing Liu, Yunxia Fan, Li Bair, Woei-Nan Qiao, Yujia (Susanna) Glynn, Nancy W. BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) was developed to capture fatigue and demand in a single tool, filling a gap that no validated questionnaire existed to measure perceived fatigability. Since fatigability is a more sensitive measure of a person’s susceptibility to fatigue, we validated the simplified-Chinese version of the PFS among Chinese community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in an urban community in Beijing between November 2018 and July 2019. The PFS was translated into simplified-Chinese by the translation, retro-translation method. Internal consistency of the Physical subscale of the PFS was evaluated by Cronbach’s alpha. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were evaluated against physical performance measures (i.e., Short Physical Performance Battery & Timed Up and Go Test) and daily living performance (i.e., Barthel Index & Instrumental activity of daily living). RESULTS: Our study included 457 participants, including 182 men (39.8%) and 275 women (60.2%). The age range of the included participants was 61–96 years (mean = 84.8 years, SD = 5.8 years). The simplified-Chinese version of PFS Physical scores showed strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.81). Higher PFS Physical scores were associated with worse physical performance, and daily living performance (|correlation coefficient| range: 0.36–0.56, p < .001). Age- and sex-adjusted PFS Physical scores had moderate to good overall discrimination for correctly classifying people by their physical performance and daily living performance (AUCs range 0.70–0.87, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The PFS simplified-Chinese version is a valid instrument to assess perceived physical fatigability in Chinese-speaking older adults with good convergent validity. Thus, the PFS, with low cost and greater feasibility, is a desired tool to measure fatigability in large population studies. BioMed Central 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8157666/ /pubmed/34039260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02275-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hu, Yixin
Zhang, Hangming
Xu, Weihao
Zhao, Ming
Liu, Juan
Wu, Linna
Zou, Lin
Zuo, Jing
Liu, Yunxia
Fan, Li
Bair, Woei-Nan
Qiao, Yujia (Susanna)
Glynn, Nancy W.
Validation of perceived physical fatigability using the simplified-Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale
title Validation of perceived physical fatigability using the simplified-Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale
title_full Validation of perceived physical fatigability using the simplified-Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale
title_fullStr Validation of perceived physical fatigability using the simplified-Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale
title_full_unstemmed Validation of perceived physical fatigability using the simplified-Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale
title_short Validation of perceived physical fatigability using the simplified-Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale
title_sort validation of perceived physical fatigability using the simplified-chinese version of the pittsburgh fatigability scale
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34039260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02275-x
work_keys_str_mv AT huyixin validationofperceivedphysicalfatigabilityusingthesimplifiedchineseversionofthepittsburghfatigabilityscale
AT zhanghangming validationofperceivedphysicalfatigabilityusingthesimplifiedchineseversionofthepittsburghfatigabilityscale
AT xuweihao validationofperceivedphysicalfatigabilityusingthesimplifiedchineseversionofthepittsburghfatigabilityscale
AT zhaoming validationofperceivedphysicalfatigabilityusingthesimplifiedchineseversionofthepittsburghfatigabilityscale
AT liujuan validationofperceivedphysicalfatigabilityusingthesimplifiedchineseversionofthepittsburghfatigabilityscale
AT wulinna validationofperceivedphysicalfatigabilityusingthesimplifiedchineseversionofthepittsburghfatigabilityscale
AT zoulin validationofperceivedphysicalfatigabilityusingthesimplifiedchineseversionofthepittsburghfatigabilityscale
AT zuojing validationofperceivedphysicalfatigabilityusingthesimplifiedchineseversionofthepittsburghfatigabilityscale
AT liuyunxia validationofperceivedphysicalfatigabilityusingthesimplifiedchineseversionofthepittsburghfatigabilityscale
AT fanli validationofperceivedphysicalfatigabilityusingthesimplifiedchineseversionofthepittsburghfatigabilityscale
AT bairwoeinan validationofperceivedphysicalfatigabilityusingthesimplifiedchineseversionofthepittsburghfatigabilityscale
AT qiaoyujiasusanna validationofperceivedphysicalfatigabilityusingthesimplifiedchineseversionofthepittsburghfatigabilityscale
AT glynnnancyw validationofperceivedphysicalfatigabilityusingthesimplifiedchineseversionofthepittsburghfatigabilityscale