Cargando…
Is prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection needed for lower rectal cancer? A single-center retrospective study
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in treating patients with lower rectal cancer remains controversial and has not been clearly established. Therefore, we aimed to retrospectively analyze the survival impact of prophylactic LLND in patients with lower...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34039328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01263-7 |
_version_ | 1783699739171094528 |
---|---|
author | Kondo, Hiroka Yamaguchi, Shigeki Hirano, Yasumitsu Aikawa, Masayasu Sato, Hiroshi Okamoto, Kojun Sakuramoto, Shinichi Koyama, Isamu |
author_facet | Kondo, Hiroka Yamaguchi, Shigeki Hirano, Yasumitsu Aikawa, Masayasu Sato, Hiroshi Okamoto, Kojun Sakuramoto, Shinichi Koyama, Isamu |
author_sort | Kondo, Hiroka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in treating patients with lower rectal cancer remains controversial and has not been clearly established. Therefore, we aimed to retrospectively analyze the survival impact of prophylactic LLND in patients with lower rectal cancer. METHODS: Data of 301 patients with lower rectal cancer (tumor’s lower edge on the anal side of the peritoneal reflexion) with clinical T3 disease and negative preoperative lateral lymph node metastasis, who underwent radical resection (R0) at our hospital between April 2007 and March 2017, were included in this study. Patients who received preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded. The relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared between the dissection (prophylactic LLND, n = 37) and non-dissection (no prophylactic LLND, n = 264) groups. RESULTS: Significantly fewer men and younger patients were noted in the dissection group than in the non-dissection group. Post-surgery 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 69.6% and 66.8% in the dissection group and 75.1% and 72.5% in the non-dissection group, respectively (5-year post-surgery RFS, p = 0.58). In the dissection and non-dissection groups, the 5-year OS rates were 86.5% and 79.7%, respectively (p = 0.29), and the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 88.9% and 86.0%, respectively (p = 0.29), with no significant differences. Lateral lymph node recurrence was observed in one (2.7%) and 10 patients (3.8%) in the dissection and non-dissection groups, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the effectiveness of prophylactic LLND was limited in patients with > T3 lower rectal cancer with no evidence of preoperative lymph node metastasis. Prophylactic LLND may not be necessary if there is no preoperative lymph node metastasis, even if the invasion depth is T3 or higher. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8157696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81576962021-05-28 Is prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection needed for lower rectal cancer? A single-center retrospective study Kondo, Hiroka Yamaguchi, Shigeki Hirano, Yasumitsu Aikawa, Masayasu Sato, Hiroshi Okamoto, Kojun Sakuramoto, Shinichi Koyama, Isamu BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in treating patients with lower rectal cancer remains controversial and has not been clearly established. Therefore, we aimed to retrospectively analyze the survival impact of prophylactic LLND in patients with lower rectal cancer. METHODS: Data of 301 patients with lower rectal cancer (tumor’s lower edge on the anal side of the peritoneal reflexion) with clinical T3 disease and negative preoperative lateral lymph node metastasis, who underwent radical resection (R0) at our hospital between April 2007 and March 2017, were included in this study. Patients who received preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded. The relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared between the dissection (prophylactic LLND, n = 37) and non-dissection (no prophylactic LLND, n = 264) groups. RESULTS: Significantly fewer men and younger patients were noted in the dissection group than in the non-dissection group. Post-surgery 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 69.6% and 66.8% in the dissection group and 75.1% and 72.5% in the non-dissection group, respectively (5-year post-surgery RFS, p = 0.58). In the dissection and non-dissection groups, the 5-year OS rates were 86.5% and 79.7%, respectively (p = 0.29), and the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 88.9% and 86.0%, respectively (p = 0.29), with no significant differences. Lateral lymph node recurrence was observed in one (2.7%) and 10 patients (3.8%) in the dissection and non-dissection groups, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the effectiveness of prophylactic LLND was limited in patients with > T3 lower rectal cancer with no evidence of preoperative lymph node metastasis. Prophylactic LLND may not be necessary if there is no preoperative lymph node metastasis, even if the invasion depth is T3 or higher. BioMed Central 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8157696/ /pubmed/34039328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01263-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kondo, Hiroka Yamaguchi, Shigeki Hirano, Yasumitsu Aikawa, Masayasu Sato, Hiroshi Okamoto, Kojun Sakuramoto, Shinichi Koyama, Isamu Is prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection needed for lower rectal cancer? A single-center retrospective study |
title | Is prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection needed for lower rectal cancer? A single-center retrospective study |
title_full | Is prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection needed for lower rectal cancer? A single-center retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Is prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection needed for lower rectal cancer? A single-center retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Is prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection needed for lower rectal cancer? A single-center retrospective study |
title_short | Is prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection needed for lower rectal cancer? A single-center retrospective study |
title_sort | is prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection needed for lower rectal cancer? a single-center retrospective study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34039328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01263-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kondohiroka isprophylacticlaterallymphnodedissectionneededforlowerrectalcancerasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT yamaguchishigeki isprophylacticlaterallymphnodedissectionneededforlowerrectalcancerasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT hiranoyasumitsu isprophylacticlaterallymphnodedissectionneededforlowerrectalcancerasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT aikawamasayasu isprophylacticlaterallymphnodedissectionneededforlowerrectalcancerasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT satohiroshi isprophylacticlaterallymphnodedissectionneededforlowerrectalcancerasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT okamotokojun isprophylacticlaterallymphnodedissectionneededforlowerrectalcancerasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT sakuramotoshinichi isprophylacticlaterallymphnodedissectionneededforlowerrectalcancerasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT koyamaisamu isprophylacticlaterallymphnodedissectionneededforlowerrectalcancerasinglecenterretrospectivestudy |