Cargando…
Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the compatibility of robotic single-site (RSS) myomectomy in comparison with the conventional robotic multi-port (RMP) myomectomy to achieve successful surgical outcomes with reliability and reproducibility. METHODS: This retrospective case–control study was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34044817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01245-9 |
_version_ | 1783699739405975552 |
---|---|
author | Ahn, So Hyun Park, Joo Hyun Kim, Hye Rim Cho, SiHyun Lee, Myeongjee Seo, Seok Kyo Choi, Young Sik Lee, Byung Seok |
author_facet | Ahn, So Hyun Park, Joo Hyun Kim, Hye Rim Cho, SiHyun Lee, Myeongjee Seo, Seok Kyo Choi, Young Sik Lee, Byung Seok |
author_sort | Ahn, So Hyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the compatibility of robotic single-site (RSS) myomectomy in comparison with the conventional robotic multi-port (RMP) myomectomy to achieve successful surgical outcomes with reliability and reproducibility. METHODS: This retrospective case–control study was performed on 236 robotic myomectomies at a university medical center. After 1:1 propensity score matching for the total myoma number, total myoma diameter, and patient age, 90 patients in each group (RSS: n = 90; RMP: n = 90) were evaluated. Patient demographics, preoperative parameters, intraoperative characteristics, and postoperative outcome measures were analyzed. RESULTS: The body mass index, parity, preoperative hemoglobin levels, mean maximal myoma diameter, and anatomical type of myoma showed no mean differences between RSS and RMP myomectomies. The RSS group was younger, had lesser number of myomas removed, and had a smaller sum of the maximal diameter of total myomas removed than the RMP group. After propensity score matching, the total operative time (RSS: 150.9 ± 57.1 min vs. RMP: 170 ± 74.5 min, p = 0.0296) was significantly shorter in the RSS group. The RSS group tended to have a longer docking time (RSS: 9.8 ± 6.5 min vs. RMP: 8 ± 6.2 min, p = 0.0527), shorter console time (RSS: 111.1 ± 52.3 min vs. RMP: 125.8 ± 65.1 min, p = 0.0665), and shorter time required for in-bag morcellation (RSS: 30.1 ± 17.2 min vs. RMP: 36.2 ± 25.7 min, p = 0.0684). The visual analog scale pain score 1 day postoperatively was significantly lower in the RSS group (RSS: 2.4 ± 0.8 days vs. RMP: 2.7 ± 0.8 days, p = 0.0149), with similar consumption of analgesic drugs. The rate of transfusion, estimated blood loss during the operation, and length of hospital stay were not different between the two modalities. No other noticeable complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Da Vinci RSS myomectomy is a compatible option with regard to reproducibility and safety, without significantly compromising the number and sum of the maximal diameter of myomas removed. The advantage of shorter total operative time and less pain with the same amount of analgesic drugs in RSS myomectomy will contribute to improving patient satisfaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8157697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81576972021-05-28 Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study Ahn, So Hyun Park, Joo Hyun Kim, Hye Rim Cho, SiHyun Lee, Myeongjee Seo, Seok Kyo Choi, Young Sik Lee, Byung Seok BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the compatibility of robotic single-site (RSS) myomectomy in comparison with the conventional robotic multi-port (RMP) myomectomy to achieve successful surgical outcomes with reliability and reproducibility. METHODS: This retrospective case–control study was performed on 236 robotic myomectomies at a university medical center. After 1:1 propensity score matching for the total myoma number, total myoma diameter, and patient age, 90 patients in each group (RSS: n = 90; RMP: n = 90) were evaluated. Patient demographics, preoperative parameters, intraoperative characteristics, and postoperative outcome measures were analyzed. RESULTS: The body mass index, parity, preoperative hemoglobin levels, mean maximal myoma diameter, and anatomical type of myoma showed no mean differences between RSS and RMP myomectomies. The RSS group was younger, had lesser number of myomas removed, and had a smaller sum of the maximal diameter of total myomas removed than the RMP group. After propensity score matching, the total operative time (RSS: 150.9 ± 57.1 min vs. RMP: 170 ± 74.5 min, p = 0.0296) was significantly shorter in the RSS group. The RSS group tended to have a longer docking time (RSS: 9.8 ± 6.5 min vs. RMP: 8 ± 6.2 min, p = 0.0527), shorter console time (RSS: 111.1 ± 52.3 min vs. RMP: 125.8 ± 65.1 min, p = 0.0665), and shorter time required for in-bag morcellation (RSS: 30.1 ± 17.2 min vs. RMP: 36.2 ± 25.7 min, p = 0.0684). The visual analog scale pain score 1 day postoperatively was significantly lower in the RSS group (RSS: 2.4 ± 0.8 days vs. RMP: 2.7 ± 0.8 days, p = 0.0149), with similar consumption of analgesic drugs. The rate of transfusion, estimated blood loss during the operation, and length of hospital stay were not different between the two modalities. No other noticeable complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Da Vinci RSS myomectomy is a compatible option with regard to reproducibility and safety, without significantly compromising the number and sum of the maximal diameter of myomas removed. The advantage of shorter total operative time and less pain with the same amount of analgesic drugs in RSS myomectomy will contribute to improving patient satisfaction. BioMed Central 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8157697/ /pubmed/34044817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01245-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ahn, So Hyun Park, Joo Hyun Kim, Hye Rim Cho, SiHyun Lee, Myeongjee Seo, Seok Kyo Choi, Young Sik Lee, Byung Seok Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study |
title | Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study |
title_full | Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study |
title_fullStr | Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study |
title_short | Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study |
title_sort | robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34044817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01245-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahnsohyun roboticsinglesiteversusmultiportmyomectomyacasecontrolstudy AT parkjoohyun roboticsinglesiteversusmultiportmyomectomyacasecontrolstudy AT kimhyerim roboticsinglesiteversusmultiportmyomectomyacasecontrolstudy AT chosihyun roboticsinglesiteversusmultiportmyomectomyacasecontrolstudy AT leemyeongjee roboticsinglesiteversusmultiportmyomectomyacasecontrolstudy AT seoseokkyo roboticsinglesiteversusmultiportmyomectomyacasecontrolstudy AT choiyoungsik roboticsinglesiteversusmultiportmyomectomyacasecontrolstudy AT leebyungseok roboticsinglesiteversusmultiportmyomectomyacasecontrolstudy |