Cargando…

Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the compatibility of robotic single-site (RSS) myomectomy in comparison with the conventional robotic multi-port (RMP) myomectomy to achieve successful surgical outcomes with reliability and reproducibility. METHODS: This retrospective case–control study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahn, So Hyun, Park, Joo Hyun, Kim, Hye Rim, Cho, SiHyun, Lee, Myeongjee, Seo, Seok Kyo, Choi, Young Sik, Lee, Byung Seok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34044817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01245-9
_version_ 1783699739405975552
author Ahn, So Hyun
Park, Joo Hyun
Kim, Hye Rim
Cho, SiHyun
Lee, Myeongjee
Seo, Seok Kyo
Choi, Young Sik
Lee, Byung Seok
author_facet Ahn, So Hyun
Park, Joo Hyun
Kim, Hye Rim
Cho, SiHyun
Lee, Myeongjee
Seo, Seok Kyo
Choi, Young Sik
Lee, Byung Seok
author_sort Ahn, So Hyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the compatibility of robotic single-site (RSS) myomectomy in comparison with the conventional robotic multi-port (RMP) myomectomy to achieve successful surgical outcomes with reliability and reproducibility. METHODS: This retrospective case–control study was performed on 236 robotic myomectomies at a university medical center. After 1:1 propensity score matching for the total myoma number, total myoma diameter, and patient age, 90 patients in each group (RSS: n = 90; RMP: n = 90) were evaluated. Patient demographics, preoperative parameters, intraoperative characteristics, and postoperative outcome measures were analyzed. RESULTS: The body mass index, parity, preoperative hemoglobin levels, mean maximal myoma diameter, and anatomical type of myoma showed no mean differences between RSS and RMP myomectomies. The RSS group was younger, had lesser number of myomas removed, and had a smaller sum of the maximal diameter of total myomas removed than the RMP group. After propensity score matching, the total operative time (RSS: 150.9 ± 57.1 min vs. RMP: 170 ± 74.5 min, p = 0.0296) was significantly shorter in the RSS group. The RSS group tended to have a longer docking time (RSS: 9.8 ± 6.5 min vs. RMP: 8 ± 6.2 min, p = 0.0527), shorter console time (RSS: 111.1 ± 52.3 min vs. RMP: 125.8 ± 65.1 min, p = 0.0665), and shorter time required for in-bag morcellation (RSS: 30.1 ± 17.2 min vs. RMP: 36.2 ± 25.7 min, p = 0.0684). The visual analog scale pain score 1 day postoperatively was significantly lower in the RSS group (RSS: 2.4 ± 0.8 days vs. RMP: 2.7 ± 0.8 days, p = 0.0149), with similar consumption of analgesic drugs. The rate of transfusion, estimated blood loss during the operation, and length of hospital stay were not different between the two modalities. No other noticeable complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Da Vinci RSS myomectomy is a compatible option with regard to reproducibility and safety, without significantly compromising the number and sum of the maximal diameter of myomas removed. The advantage of shorter total operative time and less pain with the same amount of analgesic drugs in RSS myomectomy will contribute to improving patient satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8157697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81576972021-05-28 Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study Ahn, So Hyun Park, Joo Hyun Kim, Hye Rim Cho, SiHyun Lee, Myeongjee Seo, Seok Kyo Choi, Young Sik Lee, Byung Seok BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the compatibility of robotic single-site (RSS) myomectomy in comparison with the conventional robotic multi-port (RMP) myomectomy to achieve successful surgical outcomes with reliability and reproducibility. METHODS: This retrospective case–control study was performed on 236 robotic myomectomies at a university medical center. After 1:1 propensity score matching for the total myoma number, total myoma diameter, and patient age, 90 patients in each group (RSS: n = 90; RMP: n = 90) were evaluated. Patient demographics, preoperative parameters, intraoperative characteristics, and postoperative outcome measures were analyzed. RESULTS: The body mass index, parity, preoperative hemoglobin levels, mean maximal myoma diameter, and anatomical type of myoma showed no mean differences between RSS and RMP myomectomies. The RSS group was younger, had lesser number of myomas removed, and had a smaller sum of the maximal diameter of total myomas removed than the RMP group. After propensity score matching, the total operative time (RSS: 150.9 ± 57.1 min vs. RMP: 170 ± 74.5 min, p = 0.0296) was significantly shorter in the RSS group. The RSS group tended to have a longer docking time (RSS: 9.8 ± 6.5 min vs. RMP: 8 ± 6.2 min, p = 0.0527), shorter console time (RSS: 111.1 ± 52.3 min vs. RMP: 125.8 ± 65.1 min, p = 0.0665), and shorter time required for in-bag morcellation (RSS: 30.1 ± 17.2 min vs. RMP: 36.2 ± 25.7 min, p = 0.0684). The visual analog scale pain score 1 day postoperatively was significantly lower in the RSS group (RSS: 2.4 ± 0.8 days vs. RMP: 2.7 ± 0.8 days, p = 0.0149), with similar consumption of analgesic drugs. The rate of transfusion, estimated blood loss during the operation, and length of hospital stay were not different between the two modalities. No other noticeable complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Da Vinci RSS myomectomy is a compatible option with regard to reproducibility and safety, without significantly compromising the number and sum of the maximal diameter of myomas removed. The advantage of shorter total operative time and less pain with the same amount of analgesic drugs in RSS myomectomy will contribute to improving patient satisfaction. BioMed Central 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8157697/ /pubmed/34044817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01245-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ahn, So Hyun
Park, Joo Hyun
Kim, Hye Rim
Cho, SiHyun
Lee, Myeongjee
Seo, Seok Kyo
Choi, Young Sik
Lee, Byung Seok
Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study
title Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study
title_full Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study
title_fullStr Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study
title_full_unstemmed Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study
title_short Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study
title_sort robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34044817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01245-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ahnsohyun roboticsinglesiteversusmultiportmyomectomyacasecontrolstudy
AT parkjoohyun roboticsinglesiteversusmultiportmyomectomyacasecontrolstudy
AT kimhyerim roboticsinglesiteversusmultiportmyomectomyacasecontrolstudy
AT chosihyun roboticsinglesiteversusmultiportmyomectomyacasecontrolstudy
AT leemyeongjee roboticsinglesiteversusmultiportmyomectomyacasecontrolstudy
AT seoseokkyo roboticsinglesiteversusmultiportmyomectomyacasecontrolstudy
AT choiyoungsik roboticsinglesiteversusmultiportmyomectomyacasecontrolstudy
AT leebyungseok roboticsinglesiteversusmultiportmyomectomyacasecontrolstudy