Cargando…

One Is the Coldest Number: How Group Size and Body Weight Affect Thermal Preference in Weaned Pigs (3 to 15 kg)

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Exposure to thermal stress can negatively impact an animals’ overall welfare, resulting in decreased body condition, slower growth rates, and in severe cases, mortality. Understanding the thermal comfort of pigs can help producers reduce thermal stress and improve the overall well-be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robbins, Lindsey A., Green-Miller, Angela R., Johnson, Jay S., Gaskill, Brianna N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34070010
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11051447
_version_ 1783699774983110656
author Robbins, Lindsey A.
Green-Miller, Angela R.
Johnson, Jay S.
Gaskill, Brianna N.
author_facet Robbins, Lindsey A.
Green-Miller, Angela R.
Johnson, Jay S.
Gaskill, Brianna N.
author_sort Robbins, Lindsey A.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Exposure to thermal stress can negatively impact an animals’ overall welfare, resulting in decreased body condition, slower growth rates, and in severe cases, mortality. Understanding the thermal comfort of pigs can help producers reduce thermal stress and improve the overall well-being of these animals. To understand pigs’ thermal comfort, this study utilized temperature preference with weaned pigs by allowing them to select from a range of temperatures within a thermal apparatus. However, temperature preference is complicated given that a variety of factors can influence thermal comfort. Previous research has indicated that temperature preference is altered based on the number of individuals tested as this can alter their thermal comfort. Social aggregation, through huddling, results in greater heat conservation and animals find cooler temperatures more comfortable. Thus, this study looked at how social groups and different body weight could influence the temperature preference of pigs. Results showed that individual pigs preferred warmer temperatures compared to those in groups of 2 and 4, and that heavier pigs preferred cooler temperatures compared to medium- and lightweight pigs. This study demonstrates that a greater number of individuals perceive a cooler temperature as being within their comfort zone, whereas an individual does not have access to the thermal benefits of social aggregation. ABSTRACT: Housing pigs within their thermal comfort zone positively impacts productivity and performance. However, fundamental information on behavioral thermoregulatory responses of individual and group-housed pigs is meager. As a gregarious species, pigs prefer to be near one another, touching and often huddling. As pigs huddle together, they decrease their heat loss to the environment by decreasing exposed surface area and increasing mass. Additionally, pigs gain weight rapidly as they age. As an individual grows, their ability to withstand lower temperatures increases. We hypothesized that group size would alter pig thermal preference and that thermal preference would change based upon body weight. Thirty-six groups of pigs (n = 2 pigs/group) were tested in a factorial design based on group size (1, 2, or 4) and weight category (small: 5.20 ± 1.15 kg; medium: 8.79 ± 1.30 kg; and large: 13.95 ± 1.26 kg) in both sexes. Treatment groups were placed inside a chamber with a controlled thermal gradient (4.6 m × 0.9 m × 0.9 m; L × W × H) that ranged in temperature from 18 to 30 °C. Pigs habituated to the gradient for 24 h. The following 24 h testing period was continuously video recorded and each pig’s location during inactivity (~70% daily budget) within the thermal apparatus was recorded every 10 min via instantaneous scan sampling. Data were analyzed using a GLM and log10 + 0.001 transformed for normality. Tukey tests and Bonferroni-corrected custom tests were used for post hoc comparisons. Peak temperature preference was determined by the maximum amount of time spent at a specific temperature. Both group size (p = 0.001) and weight category (p < 0.001) influenced the thermal location choice of pigs. Individual pigs preferred 30.31 °C, which differed from a group of 2 (20.0 °C: p = 0.003) and 4 pigs (20.0 °C: p < 0.001). The peak temperature preference of the small pigs (30.2 °C) differed from the large pigs (20.0 °C: p < 0.001) but did not differ from the medium-sized pigs (28.4 °C: p > 0.05). Overall, heavier pigs and larger groups preferred cooler temperatures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8157870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81578702021-05-28 One Is the Coldest Number: How Group Size and Body Weight Affect Thermal Preference in Weaned Pigs (3 to 15 kg) Robbins, Lindsey A. Green-Miller, Angela R. Johnson, Jay S. Gaskill, Brianna N. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Exposure to thermal stress can negatively impact an animals’ overall welfare, resulting in decreased body condition, slower growth rates, and in severe cases, mortality. Understanding the thermal comfort of pigs can help producers reduce thermal stress and improve the overall well-being of these animals. To understand pigs’ thermal comfort, this study utilized temperature preference with weaned pigs by allowing them to select from a range of temperatures within a thermal apparatus. However, temperature preference is complicated given that a variety of factors can influence thermal comfort. Previous research has indicated that temperature preference is altered based on the number of individuals tested as this can alter their thermal comfort. Social aggregation, through huddling, results in greater heat conservation and animals find cooler temperatures more comfortable. Thus, this study looked at how social groups and different body weight could influence the temperature preference of pigs. Results showed that individual pigs preferred warmer temperatures compared to those in groups of 2 and 4, and that heavier pigs preferred cooler temperatures compared to medium- and lightweight pigs. This study demonstrates that a greater number of individuals perceive a cooler temperature as being within their comfort zone, whereas an individual does not have access to the thermal benefits of social aggregation. ABSTRACT: Housing pigs within their thermal comfort zone positively impacts productivity and performance. However, fundamental information on behavioral thermoregulatory responses of individual and group-housed pigs is meager. As a gregarious species, pigs prefer to be near one another, touching and often huddling. As pigs huddle together, they decrease their heat loss to the environment by decreasing exposed surface area and increasing mass. Additionally, pigs gain weight rapidly as they age. As an individual grows, their ability to withstand lower temperatures increases. We hypothesized that group size would alter pig thermal preference and that thermal preference would change based upon body weight. Thirty-six groups of pigs (n = 2 pigs/group) were tested in a factorial design based on group size (1, 2, or 4) and weight category (small: 5.20 ± 1.15 kg; medium: 8.79 ± 1.30 kg; and large: 13.95 ± 1.26 kg) in both sexes. Treatment groups were placed inside a chamber with a controlled thermal gradient (4.6 m × 0.9 m × 0.9 m; L × W × H) that ranged in temperature from 18 to 30 °C. Pigs habituated to the gradient for 24 h. The following 24 h testing period was continuously video recorded and each pig’s location during inactivity (~70% daily budget) within the thermal apparatus was recorded every 10 min via instantaneous scan sampling. Data were analyzed using a GLM and log10 + 0.001 transformed for normality. Tukey tests and Bonferroni-corrected custom tests were used for post hoc comparisons. Peak temperature preference was determined by the maximum amount of time spent at a specific temperature. Both group size (p = 0.001) and weight category (p < 0.001) influenced the thermal location choice of pigs. Individual pigs preferred 30.31 °C, which differed from a group of 2 (20.0 °C: p = 0.003) and 4 pigs (20.0 °C: p < 0.001). The peak temperature preference of the small pigs (30.2 °C) differed from the large pigs (20.0 °C: p < 0.001) but did not differ from the medium-sized pigs (28.4 °C: p > 0.05). Overall, heavier pigs and larger groups preferred cooler temperatures. MDPI 2021-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8157870/ /pubmed/34070010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11051447 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Robbins, Lindsey A.
Green-Miller, Angela R.
Johnson, Jay S.
Gaskill, Brianna N.
One Is the Coldest Number: How Group Size and Body Weight Affect Thermal Preference in Weaned Pigs (3 to 15 kg)
title One Is the Coldest Number: How Group Size and Body Weight Affect Thermal Preference in Weaned Pigs (3 to 15 kg)
title_full One Is the Coldest Number: How Group Size and Body Weight Affect Thermal Preference in Weaned Pigs (3 to 15 kg)
title_fullStr One Is the Coldest Number: How Group Size and Body Weight Affect Thermal Preference in Weaned Pigs (3 to 15 kg)
title_full_unstemmed One Is the Coldest Number: How Group Size and Body Weight Affect Thermal Preference in Weaned Pigs (3 to 15 kg)
title_short One Is the Coldest Number: How Group Size and Body Weight Affect Thermal Preference in Weaned Pigs (3 to 15 kg)
title_sort one is the coldest number: how group size and body weight affect thermal preference in weaned pigs (3 to 15 kg)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34070010
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11051447
work_keys_str_mv AT robbinslindseya oneisthecoldestnumberhowgroupsizeandbodyweightaffectthermalpreferenceinweanedpigs3to15kg
AT greenmillerangelar oneisthecoldestnumberhowgroupsizeandbodyweightaffectthermalpreferenceinweanedpigs3to15kg
AT johnsonjays oneisthecoldestnumberhowgroupsizeandbodyweightaffectthermalpreferenceinweanedpigs3to15kg
AT gaskillbriannan oneisthecoldestnumberhowgroupsizeandbodyweightaffectthermalpreferenceinweanedpigs3to15kg