Cargando…

Mortality and revision risk after femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation for undisplaced fracture with arthroplasty for displaced fracture: a population-based study from Danish National Registries

Background and purpose — Hemiarthroplasty has lower reoperation frequency and better mobilization compared with internal fixation (IF) in patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNF), which might translate into lower mortality. In this population-based cohort study we compare the risk of m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viberg, Bjarke, Frøslev, Trine, Overgaard, Søren, Pedersen, Alma Becic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8158198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1850940
_version_ 1783699834211926016
author Viberg, Bjarke
Frøslev, Trine
Overgaard, Søren
Pedersen, Alma Becic
author_facet Viberg, Bjarke
Frøslev, Trine
Overgaard, Søren
Pedersen, Alma Becic
author_sort Viberg, Bjarke
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose — Hemiarthroplasty has lower reoperation frequency and better mobilization compared with internal fixation (IF) in patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNF), which might translate into lower mortality. In this population-based cohort study we compare the risk of mortality and reoperation in undisplaced FNF treated with IF and displaced FNF treated with arthroplasty in patients older than 70 years old. We assume that, per se, there is no difference in mortality risk between patients with a displaced and an undisplaced FNF. Patients and methods — Hip fracture patients were identified in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry during 2005–2015. Data on medication, comorbidities, reoperation, and mortality were retrieved from other Danish medical databases. IF and arthroplasty patients were compared with regards to mortality and reoperation up to 5 years postoperatively. We calculated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusting for relevant confounders. Results — We included 19,260 FNF treated with arthroplasty and 10,337 FNF with IF. There was an increased risk of mortality for arthroplasty within 30 days, HR 1.3 (95% CI 1.3–1.4), compared with IF but not after 1 and 5 years. Arthroplasty patients had adjusted HRs for reoperation of 0.8 (0.8–0.9) within 1 year, 0.8 (0.7–0.9) within 2 years, and 0.8 (0.8–0.9) within 5 years postoperatively compared with IF. Interpretation — Patients treated for a displaced FNF with arthroplasty had a higher risk of 30-day mortality compared with patients who had an undisplaced FNF treated with IF. It has to be considered that there were baseline differences in the groups but there was no difference in mortality risk up to 5 years post-surgery. Concerning reoperation, patients with a displaced FNF treated with arthroplasty had a lower risk of reoperation compared with IF for undisplaced FNF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8158198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81581982021-06-07 Mortality and revision risk after femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation for undisplaced fracture with arthroplasty for displaced fracture: a population-based study from Danish National Registries Viberg, Bjarke Frøslev, Trine Overgaard, Søren Pedersen, Alma Becic Acta Orthop Research Article Background and purpose — Hemiarthroplasty has lower reoperation frequency and better mobilization compared with internal fixation (IF) in patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNF), which might translate into lower mortality. In this population-based cohort study we compare the risk of mortality and reoperation in undisplaced FNF treated with IF and displaced FNF treated with arthroplasty in patients older than 70 years old. We assume that, per se, there is no difference in mortality risk between patients with a displaced and an undisplaced FNF. Patients and methods — Hip fracture patients were identified in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry during 2005–2015. Data on medication, comorbidities, reoperation, and mortality were retrieved from other Danish medical databases. IF and arthroplasty patients were compared with regards to mortality and reoperation up to 5 years postoperatively. We calculated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusting for relevant confounders. Results — We included 19,260 FNF treated with arthroplasty and 10,337 FNF with IF. There was an increased risk of mortality for arthroplasty within 30 days, HR 1.3 (95% CI 1.3–1.4), compared with IF but not after 1 and 5 years. Arthroplasty patients had adjusted HRs for reoperation of 0.8 (0.8–0.9) within 1 year, 0.8 (0.7–0.9) within 2 years, and 0.8 (0.8–0.9) within 5 years postoperatively compared with IF. Interpretation — Patients treated for a displaced FNF with arthroplasty had a higher risk of 30-day mortality compared with patients who had an undisplaced FNF treated with IF. It has to be considered that there were baseline differences in the groups but there was no difference in mortality risk up to 5 years post-surgery. Concerning reoperation, patients with a displaced FNF treated with arthroplasty had a lower risk of reoperation compared with IF for undisplaced FNF. Taylor & Francis 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8158198/ /pubmed/33228452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1850940 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Viberg, Bjarke
Frøslev, Trine
Overgaard, Søren
Pedersen, Alma Becic
Mortality and revision risk after femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation for undisplaced fracture with arthroplasty for displaced fracture: a population-based study from Danish National Registries
title Mortality and revision risk after femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation for undisplaced fracture with arthroplasty for displaced fracture: a population-based study from Danish National Registries
title_full Mortality and revision risk after femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation for undisplaced fracture with arthroplasty for displaced fracture: a population-based study from Danish National Registries
title_fullStr Mortality and revision risk after femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation for undisplaced fracture with arthroplasty for displaced fracture: a population-based study from Danish National Registries
title_full_unstemmed Mortality and revision risk after femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation for undisplaced fracture with arthroplasty for displaced fracture: a population-based study from Danish National Registries
title_short Mortality and revision risk after femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation for undisplaced fracture with arthroplasty for displaced fracture: a population-based study from Danish National Registries
title_sort mortality and revision risk after femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation for undisplaced fracture with arthroplasty for displaced fracture: a population-based study from danish national registries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8158198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1850940
work_keys_str_mv AT vibergbjarke mortalityandrevisionriskafterfemoralneckfracturecomparisonofinternalfixationforundisplacedfracturewitharthroplastyfordisplacedfractureapopulationbasedstudyfromdanishnationalregistries
AT frøslevtrine mortalityandrevisionriskafterfemoralneckfracturecomparisonofinternalfixationforundisplacedfracturewitharthroplastyfordisplacedfractureapopulationbasedstudyfromdanishnationalregistries
AT overgaardsøren mortalityandrevisionriskafterfemoralneckfracturecomparisonofinternalfixationforundisplacedfracturewitharthroplastyfordisplacedfractureapopulationbasedstudyfromdanishnationalregistries
AT pedersenalmabecic mortalityandrevisionriskafterfemoralneckfracturecomparisonofinternalfixationforundisplacedfracturewitharthroplastyfordisplacedfractureapopulationbasedstudyfromdanishnationalregistries