Cargando…

A scoping review to ascertain the parameters for an evidence synthesis of psychological interventions to improve work and wellbeing outcomes among employees with chronic pain

Background: Psychological interventions have mixed effects on improving employee outcomes, partly due to significant variability across studies and a lack of focus on mechanisms of action. This scoping review reports on the parameters of these interventions and examines intervention content to bring...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McParland, Joanna L., Andrews, Pamela, Kidd, Lisa, Williams, Lynn, Flowers, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8158208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34104548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2020.1863809
_version_ 1783699836515647488
author McParland, Joanna L.
Andrews, Pamela
Kidd, Lisa
Williams, Lynn
Flowers, Paul
author_facet McParland, Joanna L.
Andrews, Pamela
Kidd, Lisa
Williams, Lynn
Flowers, Paul
author_sort McParland, Joanna L.
collection PubMed
description Background: Psychological interventions have mixed effects on improving employee outcomes, partly due to significant variability across studies and a lack of focus on mechanisms of action. This scoping review reports on the parameters of these interventions and examines intervention content to bring clarity to this heterogeneous topic area and direct future systematic review work. Method: Six databases were searched (Cinahl, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, PsychINFO and Web of Science) from April 2010 to August 2020, and a grey literature search was undertaken. Screening was undertaken independently by two authors. The results summarised country, participant and employment characteristics, psychological interventions and work, health and wellbeing outcomes. 10% of the papers were analysed to determine the feasibility of coding intervention descriptions for theory and behaviour change technique (BCT) components. Results: Database searches yielded 9341 titles, of which 91 studies were included. Most studies were conducted in Europe (78%) and included males and females (95%) ranging in age from 31-56.6 years although other demographic, and employment information was lacking. Musculoskeletal pain was common (87%). Psychological interventions commonly included cognitive behavioural therapy (30%) and education (28%). Most studies employed a randomised control trial design (64%). Over half contained a control group (54%). Interventions were delivered in mostly healthcare settings (72%) by health professionals. Multiple outcomes were often reported, many of which involved measuring sickness absence and return-to-work (62%) and pain and general health (53%). Within the feasibility analysis, most papers met the minimum criteria of containing one paragraph of intervention description, but none explicitly mentioned theory or BCTs. Conclusion: Psychological interventions for employees with chronic pain vary in their nature and implementation. We have shown scoping reviews can be used to assess the feasibility of applying tools from health psychology to identify the content of these interventions in future systematic review work to improve intervention development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8158208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81582082021-06-07 A scoping review to ascertain the parameters for an evidence synthesis of psychological interventions to improve work and wellbeing outcomes among employees with chronic pain McParland, Joanna L. Andrews, Pamela Kidd, Lisa Williams, Lynn Flowers, Paul Health Psychol Behav Med Review Background: Psychological interventions have mixed effects on improving employee outcomes, partly due to significant variability across studies and a lack of focus on mechanisms of action. This scoping review reports on the parameters of these interventions and examines intervention content to bring clarity to this heterogeneous topic area and direct future systematic review work. Method: Six databases were searched (Cinahl, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, PsychINFO and Web of Science) from April 2010 to August 2020, and a grey literature search was undertaken. Screening was undertaken independently by two authors. The results summarised country, participant and employment characteristics, psychological interventions and work, health and wellbeing outcomes. 10% of the papers were analysed to determine the feasibility of coding intervention descriptions for theory and behaviour change technique (BCT) components. Results: Database searches yielded 9341 titles, of which 91 studies were included. Most studies were conducted in Europe (78%) and included males and females (95%) ranging in age from 31-56.6 years although other demographic, and employment information was lacking. Musculoskeletal pain was common (87%). Psychological interventions commonly included cognitive behavioural therapy (30%) and education (28%). Most studies employed a randomised control trial design (64%). Over half contained a control group (54%). Interventions were delivered in mostly healthcare settings (72%) by health professionals. Multiple outcomes were often reported, many of which involved measuring sickness absence and return-to-work (62%) and pain and general health (53%). Within the feasibility analysis, most papers met the minimum criteria of containing one paragraph of intervention description, but none explicitly mentioned theory or BCTs. Conclusion: Psychological interventions for employees with chronic pain vary in their nature and implementation. We have shown scoping reviews can be used to assess the feasibility of applying tools from health psychology to identify the content of these interventions in future systematic review work to improve intervention development. Routledge 2021-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8158208/ /pubmed/34104548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2020.1863809 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
McParland, Joanna L.
Andrews, Pamela
Kidd, Lisa
Williams, Lynn
Flowers, Paul
A scoping review to ascertain the parameters for an evidence synthesis of psychological interventions to improve work and wellbeing outcomes among employees with chronic pain
title A scoping review to ascertain the parameters for an evidence synthesis of psychological interventions to improve work and wellbeing outcomes among employees with chronic pain
title_full A scoping review to ascertain the parameters for an evidence synthesis of psychological interventions to improve work and wellbeing outcomes among employees with chronic pain
title_fullStr A scoping review to ascertain the parameters for an evidence synthesis of psychological interventions to improve work and wellbeing outcomes among employees with chronic pain
title_full_unstemmed A scoping review to ascertain the parameters for an evidence synthesis of psychological interventions to improve work and wellbeing outcomes among employees with chronic pain
title_short A scoping review to ascertain the parameters for an evidence synthesis of psychological interventions to improve work and wellbeing outcomes among employees with chronic pain
title_sort scoping review to ascertain the parameters for an evidence synthesis of psychological interventions to improve work and wellbeing outcomes among employees with chronic pain
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8158208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34104548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2020.1863809
work_keys_str_mv AT mcparlandjoannal ascopingreviewtoascertaintheparametersforanevidencesynthesisofpsychologicalinterventionstoimproveworkandwellbeingoutcomesamongemployeeswithchronicpain
AT andrewspamela ascopingreviewtoascertaintheparametersforanevidencesynthesisofpsychologicalinterventionstoimproveworkandwellbeingoutcomesamongemployeeswithchronicpain
AT kiddlisa ascopingreviewtoascertaintheparametersforanevidencesynthesisofpsychologicalinterventionstoimproveworkandwellbeingoutcomesamongemployeeswithchronicpain
AT williamslynn ascopingreviewtoascertaintheparametersforanevidencesynthesisofpsychologicalinterventionstoimproveworkandwellbeingoutcomesamongemployeeswithchronicpain
AT flowerspaul ascopingreviewtoascertaintheparametersforanevidencesynthesisofpsychologicalinterventionstoimproveworkandwellbeingoutcomesamongemployeeswithchronicpain
AT mcparlandjoannal scopingreviewtoascertaintheparametersforanevidencesynthesisofpsychologicalinterventionstoimproveworkandwellbeingoutcomesamongemployeeswithchronicpain
AT andrewspamela scopingreviewtoascertaintheparametersforanevidencesynthesisofpsychologicalinterventionstoimproveworkandwellbeingoutcomesamongemployeeswithchronicpain
AT kiddlisa scopingreviewtoascertaintheparametersforanevidencesynthesisofpsychologicalinterventionstoimproveworkandwellbeingoutcomesamongemployeeswithchronicpain
AT williamslynn scopingreviewtoascertaintheparametersforanevidencesynthesisofpsychologicalinterventionstoimproveworkandwellbeingoutcomesamongemployeeswithchronicpain
AT flowerspaul scopingreviewtoascertaintheparametersforanevidencesynthesisofpsychologicalinterventionstoimproveworkandwellbeingoutcomesamongemployeeswithchronicpain