Cargando…

A Prospective Double-Blind Comparative Clinical Study Between Caudal Levobupivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine and Ropivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine on Post-Operative Analgesia in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Infra-Umbilical Surgery

INTRODUCTION: Caudal epidural block is a reliable technique in paediatric patients but associated with various complications especially with higher concentration of drugs. We proposed a comparative study between levobupivacaine and ropivacaine at low concentration (0.125%) with clonidine at low dose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chandrakant, Prasad, Vinod Kumar, Verma, Arvind, Kumar, Neeraj, Kumar, Gunjan, Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8158307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34056125
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/rjaic-2020-0007
_version_ 1783699857762942976
author Chandrakant, Prasad
Vinod Kumar, Verma
Arvind, Kumar
Neeraj, Kumar
Gunjan, Kumar
author_facet Chandrakant, Prasad
Vinod Kumar, Verma
Arvind, Kumar
Neeraj, Kumar
Gunjan, Kumar
author_sort Chandrakant, Prasad
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Caudal epidural block is a reliable technique in paediatric patients but associated with various complications especially with higher concentration of drugs. We proposed a comparative study between levobupivacaine and ropivacaine at low concentration (0.125%) with clonidine at low dose (1 mcg/kg) taken as adjuvant. We aimed to see duration of post-operative analgesia, degree of motor blockade and other associated complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty paediatric patients (1–6 years), American society of anaesthesiologists grade I and II, undergoing infra-umbilical surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups of 40 each. Group A patients were given caudal levobupivacaine (0.125%) and Group B patients were given caudal ropivacaine (0.125%). Clonidine (1 mcg/kg) was taken as adjuvant in both the groups. Post-operative pain, sedation and motor blockade were assessed at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours and 24 hours using Observational Pain Scale, modified Bromage Scale and four-point sedation score, respectively. Any other complications were also noted. RESULTS: Motor blockade was not associated with any of the patients. Duration of post-operative sedation was similar in both the groups. Duration of post-operative analgesia was significantly higher in Group A (p < 0.0001). Adverse effects and complications were negligible in both the groups. CONCLUSION: Both levobupivacaine and ropivacaine can be used safely at low concentration (0.125%) taking clonidine at low dose (1 mcg/kg) as adjuvant in paediatric caudal epidural block without significant motor blockade and other complications, duration of post-operative analgesia being significantly higher in the levobupivacaine group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8158307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81583072021-05-28 A Prospective Double-Blind Comparative Clinical Study Between Caudal Levobupivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine and Ropivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine on Post-Operative Analgesia in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Infra-Umbilical Surgery Chandrakant, Prasad Vinod Kumar, Verma Arvind, Kumar Neeraj, Kumar Gunjan, Kumar Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care Research Article INTRODUCTION: Caudal epidural block is a reliable technique in paediatric patients but associated with various complications especially with higher concentration of drugs. We proposed a comparative study between levobupivacaine and ropivacaine at low concentration (0.125%) with clonidine at low dose (1 mcg/kg) taken as adjuvant. We aimed to see duration of post-operative analgesia, degree of motor blockade and other associated complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty paediatric patients (1–6 years), American society of anaesthesiologists grade I and II, undergoing infra-umbilical surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups of 40 each. Group A patients were given caudal levobupivacaine (0.125%) and Group B patients were given caudal ropivacaine (0.125%). Clonidine (1 mcg/kg) was taken as adjuvant in both the groups. Post-operative pain, sedation and motor blockade were assessed at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours and 24 hours using Observational Pain Scale, modified Bromage Scale and four-point sedation score, respectively. Any other complications were also noted. RESULTS: Motor blockade was not associated with any of the patients. Duration of post-operative sedation was similar in both the groups. Duration of post-operative analgesia was significantly higher in Group A (p < 0.0001). Adverse effects and complications were negligible in both the groups. CONCLUSION: Both levobupivacaine and ropivacaine can be used safely at low concentration (0.125%) taking clonidine at low dose (1 mcg/kg) as adjuvant in paediatric caudal epidural block without significant motor blockade and other complications, duration of post-operative analgesia being significantly higher in the levobupivacaine group. Sciendo 2020-07 2020-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8158307/ /pubmed/34056125 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/rjaic-2020-0007 Text en © 2020 Prasad Chandrakant et al., published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chandrakant, Prasad
Vinod Kumar, Verma
Arvind, Kumar
Neeraj, Kumar
Gunjan, Kumar
A Prospective Double-Blind Comparative Clinical Study Between Caudal Levobupivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine and Ropivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine on Post-Operative Analgesia in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Infra-Umbilical Surgery
title A Prospective Double-Blind Comparative Clinical Study Between Caudal Levobupivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine and Ropivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine on Post-Operative Analgesia in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Infra-Umbilical Surgery
title_full A Prospective Double-Blind Comparative Clinical Study Between Caudal Levobupivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine and Ropivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine on Post-Operative Analgesia in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Infra-Umbilical Surgery
title_fullStr A Prospective Double-Blind Comparative Clinical Study Between Caudal Levobupivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine and Ropivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine on Post-Operative Analgesia in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Infra-Umbilical Surgery
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Double-Blind Comparative Clinical Study Between Caudal Levobupivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine and Ropivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine on Post-Operative Analgesia in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Infra-Umbilical Surgery
title_short A Prospective Double-Blind Comparative Clinical Study Between Caudal Levobupivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine and Ropivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine on Post-Operative Analgesia in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Infra-Umbilical Surgery
title_sort prospective double-blind comparative clinical study between caudal levobupivacaine (0.125%) with clonidine and ropivacaine (0.125%) with clonidine on post-operative analgesia in paediatric patients undergoing infra-umbilical surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8158307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34056125
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/rjaic-2020-0007
work_keys_str_mv AT chandrakantprasad aprospectivedoubleblindcomparativeclinicalstudybetweencaudallevobupivacaine0125withclonidineandropivacaine0125withclonidineonpostoperativeanalgesiainpaediatricpatientsundergoinginfraumbilicalsurgery
AT vinodkumarverma aprospectivedoubleblindcomparativeclinicalstudybetweencaudallevobupivacaine0125withclonidineandropivacaine0125withclonidineonpostoperativeanalgesiainpaediatricpatientsundergoinginfraumbilicalsurgery
AT arvindkumar aprospectivedoubleblindcomparativeclinicalstudybetweencaudallevobupivacaine0125withclonidineandropivacaine0125withclonidineonpostoperativeanalgesiainpaediatricpatientsundergoinginfraumbilicalsurgery
AT neerajkumar aprospectivedoubleblindcomparativeclinicalstudybetweencaudallevobupivacaine0125withclonidineandropivacaine0125withclonidineonpostoperativeanalgesiainpaediatricpatientsundergoinginfraumbilicalsurgery
AT gunjankumar aprospectivedoubleblindcomparativeclinicalstudybetweencaudallevobupivacaine0125withclonidineandropivacaine0125withclonidineonpostoperativeanalgesiainpaediatricpatientsundergoinginfraumbilicalsurgery
AT chandrakantprasad prospectivedoubleblindcomparativeclinicalstudybetweencaudallevobupivacaine0125withclonidineandropivacaine0125withclonidineonpostoperativeanalgesiainpaediatricpatientsundergoinginfraumbilicalsurgery
AT vinodkumarverma prospectivedoubleblindcomparativeclinicalstudybetweencaudallevobupivacaine0125withclonidineandropivacaine0125withclonidineonpostoperativeanalgesiainpaediatricpatientsundergoinginfraumbilicalsurgery
AT arvindkumar prospectivedoubleblindcomparativeclinicalstudybetweencaudallevobupivacaine0125withclonidineandropivacaine0125withclonidineonpostoperativeanalgesiainpaediatricpatientsundergoinginfraumbilicalsurgery
AT neerajkumar prospectivedoubleblindcomparativeclinicalstudybetweencaudallevobupivacaine0125withclonidineandropivacaine0125withclonidineonpostoperativeanalgesiainpaediatricpatientsundergoinginfraumbilicalsurgery
AT gunjankumar prospectivedoubleblindcomparativeclinicalstudybetweencaudallevobupivacaine0125withclonidineandropivacaine0125withclonidineonpostoperativeanalgesiainpaediatricpatientsundergoinginfraumbilicalsurgery