Cargando…
Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study
PURPOSE: To compare the induced corneal stromal bed roughness measured with atomic force microscopy (AFM) after LASIK flap creation with the IntraLase 60 kHz and the VisuMax femtosecond laser platforms. METHODS: Three freshly enucleated porcine eyes were operated with each femtosecond laser in this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8158881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252449 |
_version_ | 1783699960115494912 |
---|---|
author | Gros-Otero, Juan Ketabi, Samira Cañones-Zafra, Rafael Garcia-Gonzalez, Montserrat Villa-Collar, Cesar Casado, Santiago Teus, Miguel A. |
author_facet | Gros-Otero, Juan Ketabi, Samira Cañones-Zafra, Rafael Garcia-Gonzalez, Montserrat Villa-Collar, Cesar Casado, Santiago Teus, Miguel A. |
author_sort | Gros-Otero, Juan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the induced corneal stromal bed roughness measured with atomic force microscopy (AFM) after LASIK flap creation with the IntraLase 60 kHz and the VisuMax femtosecond laser platforms. METHODS: Three freshly enucleated porcine eyes were operated with each femtosecond laser in this experimental study. Standard LASIK treatment parameters were used for the experiment. After LASIK flap creation, the corneal stromal roughness was assessed using a JPK NanoWizard II(®) AFM in contact mode immersed in liquid. Olympus OMCL-RC800PSA commercial silicon nitride cantilever tips were used. Surface measurements were made in 10 regions of the central cornea of each sample measuring 20 x 20 microns, at 512 x 512 point resolution. Roughness was measured using the root-mean-square (RMS) value within the given regions. RESULTS: Measurements from 30 regions of the 3 eyes (10 measurements per eye) in the Intralase (FS1) group, and 30 regions of the 3 eyes (10 measurements per eye) in the VisuMax (FS2) group were analyzed. There was a statistically significant difference in mean ± standard deviation RMS values between the FS1 and the FS2 groups (360 ± 120 versus 230 ± 100 nm respectively; P< 0.00001). CONCLUSION: This AFM study indicates that the surface of the stromal bed after LASIK flap creation is smoother in the FS2 group than the FS1 group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8158881 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81588812021-06-09 Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study Gros-Otero, Juan Ketabi, Samira Cañones-Zafra, Rafael Garcia-Gonzalez, Montserrat Villa-Collar, Cesar Casado, Santiago Teus, Miguel A. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To compare the induced corneal stromal bed roughness measured with atomic force microscopy (AFM) after LASIK flap creation with the IntraLase 60 kHz and the VisuMax femtosecond laser platforms. METHODS: Three freshly enucleated porcine eyes were operated with each femtosecond laser in this experimental study. Standard LASIK treatment parameters were used for the experiment. After LASIK flap creation, the corneal stromal roughness was assessed using a JPK NanoWizard II(®) AFM in contact mode immersed in liquid. Olympus OMCL-RC800PSA commercial silicon nitride cantilever tips were used. Surface measurements were made in 10 regions of the central cornea of each sample measuring 20 x 20 microns, at 512 x 512 point resolution. Roughness was measured using the root-mean-square (RMS) value within the given regions. RESULTS: Measurements from 30 regions of the 3 eyes (10 measurements per eye) in the Intralase (FS1) group, and 30 regions of the 3 eyes (10 measurements per eye) in the VisuMax (FS2) group were analyzed. There was a statistically significant difference in mean ± standard deviation RMS values between the FS1 and the FS2 groups (360 ± 120 versus 230 ± 100 nm respectively; P< 0.00001). CONCLUSION: This AFM study indicates that the surface of the stromal bed after LASIK flap creation is smoother in the FS2 group than the FS1 group. Public Library of Science 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8158881/ /pubmed/34043738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252449 Text en © 2021 Gros-Otero et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gros-Otero, Juan Ketabi, Samira Cañones-Zafra, Rafael Garcia-Gonzalez, Montserrat Villa-Collar, Cesar Casado, Santiago Teus, Miguel A. Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study |
title | Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study |
title_full | Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study |
title_fullStr | Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study |
title_full_unstemmed | Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study |
title_short | Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study |
title_sort | corneal stromal roughness after visumax and intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: an atomic force microscopy study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8158881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grosoterojuan cornealstromalroughnessaftervisumaxandintralasefemtosecondlaserphotodisruptionanatomicforcemicroscopystudy AT ketabisamira cornealstromalroughnessaftervisumaxandintralasefemtosecondlaserphotodisruptionanatomicforcemicroscopystudy AT canoneszafrarafael cornealstromalroughnessaftervisumaxandintralasefemtosecondlaserphotodisruptionanatomicforcemicroscopystudy AT garciagonzalezmontserrat cornealstromalroughnessaftervisumaxandintralasefemtosecondlaserphotodisruptionanatomicforcemicroscopystudy AT villacollarcesar cornealstromalroughnessaftervisumaxandintralasefemtosecondlaserphotodisruptionanatomicforcemicroscopystudy AT casadosantiago cornealstromalroughnessaftervisumaxandintralasefemtosecondlaserphotodisruptionanatomicforcemicroscopystudy AT teusmiguela cornealstromalroughnessaftervisumaxandintralasefemtosecondlaserphotodisruptionanatomicforcemicroscopystudy |