Cargando…

Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study

PURPOSE: To compare the induced corneal stromal bed roughness measured with atomic force microscopy (AFM) after LASIK flap creation with the IntraLase 60 kHz and the VisuMax femtosecond laser platforms. METHODS: Three freshly enucleated porcine eyes were operated with each femtosecond laser in this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gros-Otero, Juan, Ketabi, Samira, Cañones-Zafra, Rafael, Garcia-Gonzalez, Montserrat, Villa-Collar, Cesar, Casado, Santiago, Teus, Miguel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8158881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252449
_version_ 1783699960115494912
author Gros-Otero, Juan
Ketabi, Samira
Cañones-Zafra, Rafael
Garcia-Gonzalez, Montserrat
Villa-Collar, Cesar
Casado, Santiago
Teus, Miguel A.
author_facet Gros-Otero, Juan
Ketabi, Samira
Cañones-Zafra, Rafael
Garcia-Gonzalez, Montserrat
Villa-Collar, Cesar
Casado, Santiago
Teus, Miguel A.
author_sort Gros-Otero, Juan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the induced corneal stromal bed roughness measured with atomic force microscopy (AFM) after LASIK flap creation with the IntraLase 60 kHz and the VisuMax femtosecond laser platforms. METHODS: Three freshly enucleated porcine eyes were operated with each femtosecond laser in this experimental study. Standard LASIK treatment parameters were used for the experiment. After LASIK flap creation, the corneal stromal roughness was assessed using a JPK NanoWizard II(®) AFM in contact mode immersed in liquid. Olympus OMCL-RC800PSA commercial silicon nitride cantilever tips were used. Surface measurements were made in 10 regions of the central cornea of each sample measuring 20 x 20 microns, at 512 x 512 point resolution. Roughness was measured using the root-mean-square (RMS) value within the given regions. RESULTS: Measurements from 30 regions of the 3 eyes (10 measurements per eye) in the Intralase (FS1) group, and 30 regions of the 3 eyes (10 measurements per eye) in the VisuMax (FS2) group were analyzed. There was a statistically significant difference in mean ± standard deviation RMS values between the FS1 and the FS2 groups (360 ± 120 versus 230 ± 100 nm respectively; P< 0.00001). CONCLUSION: This AFM study indicates that the surface of the stromal bed after LASIK flap creation is smoother in the FS2 group than the FS1 group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8158881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81588812021-06-09 Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study Gros-Otero, Juan Ketabi, Samira Cañones-Zafra, Rafael Garcia-Gonzalez, Montserrat Villa-Collar, Cesar Casado, Santiago Teus, Miguel A. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To compare the induced corneal stromal bed roughness measured with atomic force microscopy (AFM) after LASIK flap creation with the IntraLase 60 kHz and the VisuMax femtosecond laser platforms. METHODS: Three freshly enucleated porcine eyes were operated with each femtosecond laser in this experimental study. Standard LASIK treatment parameters were used for the experiment. After LASIK flap creation, the corneal stromal roughness was assessed using a JPK NanoWizard II(®) AFM in contact mode immersed in liquid. Olympus OMCL-RC800PSA commercial silicon nitride cantilever tips were used. Surface measurements were made in 10 regions of the central cornea of each sample measuring 20 x 20 microns, at 512 x 512 point resolution. Roughness was measured using the root-mean-square (RMS) value within the given regions. RESULTS: Measurements from 30 regions of the 3 eyes (10 measurements per eye) in the Intralase (FS1) group, and 30 regions of the 3 eyes (10 measurements per eye) in the VisuMax (FS2) group were analyzed. There was a statistically significant difference in mean ± standard deviation RMS values between the FS1 and the FS2 groups (360 ± 120 versus 230 ± 100 nm respectively; P< 0.00001). CONCLUSION: This AFM study indicates that the surface of the stromal bed after LASIK flap creation is smoother in the FS2 group than the FS1 group. Public Library of Science 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8158881/ /pubmed/34043738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252449 Text en © 2021 Gros-Otero et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gros-Otero, Juan
Ketabi, Samira
Cañones-Zafra, Rafael
Garcia-Gonzalez, Montserrat
Villa-Collar, Cesar
Casado, Santiago
Teus, Miguel A.
Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study
title Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study
title_full Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study
title_fullStr Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study
title_full_unstemmed Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study
title_short Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study
title_sort corneal stromal roughness after visumax and intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: an atomic force microscopy study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8158881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252449
work_keys_str_mv AT grosoterojuan cornealstromalroughnessaftervisumaxandintralasefemtosecondlaserphotodisruptionanatomicforcemicroscopystudy
AT ketabisamira cornealstromalroughnessaftervisumaxandintralasefemtosecondlaserphotodisruptionanatomicforcemicroscopystudy
AT canoneszafrarafael cornealstromalroughnessaftervisumaxandintralasefemtosecondlaserphotodisruptionanatomicforcemicroscopystudy
AT garciagonzalezmontserrat cornealstromalroughnessaftervisumaxandintralasefemtosecondlaserphotodisruptionanatomicforcemicroscopystudy
AT villacollarcesar cornealstromalroughnessaftervisumaxandintralasefemtosecondlaserphotodisruptionanatomicforcemicroscopystudy
AT casadosantiago cornealstromalroughnessaftervisumaxandintralasefemtosecondlaserphotodisruptionanatomicforcemicroscopystudy
AT teusmiguela cornealstromalroughnessaftervisumaxandintralasefemtosecondlaserphotodisruptionanatomicforcemicroscopystudy