Cargando…

Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics

AIM: How reduced femoral neck anteversion alters the distribution of pressure and contact area in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (HRA) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively describe the biomechanical implication of different femoral neck version angles on HRA using a finite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bourget-Murray, Jonathan, Taneja, Ashish, Naserkhaki, Sadegh, El-Rich, Marwan, Adeeb, Samer, Powell, James, Johnston, Kelly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8158908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252435
_version_ 1783699966729912320
author Bourget-Murray, Jonathan
Taneja, Ashish
Naserkhaki, Sadegh
El-Rich, Marwan
Adeeb, Samer
Powell, James
Johnston, Kelly
author_facet Bourget-Murray, Jonathan
Taneja, Ashish
Naserkhaki, Sadegh
El-Rich, Marwan
Adeeb, Samer
Powell, James
Johnston, Kelly
author_sort Bourget-Murray, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description AIM: How reduced femoral neck anteversion alters the distribution of pressure and contact area in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (HRA) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively describe the biomechanical implication of different femoral neck version angles on HRA using a finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of sixty models were constructed to assess the effect of different femoral neck version angles on three different functional loads: 0°of hip flexion, 45°of hip flexion, and 90° of hip flexion. Femoral version was varied between 30° of anteversion to 30° of retroversion. All models were tested with the acetabular cup in four different positions: (1) 40°/15° (inclination/version), (2) 40°/25°, (3) 50°/15°, and (4) 50°/25°. Differences in range of motion due to presence of impingement, joint contact pressure, and joint contact area with different femoral versions and acetabular cup positions were calculated. RESULTS: Impingement was found to be most significant with the femur in 30° of retroversion, regardless of acetabular cup position. Anterior hip impingement occurred earlier during hip flexion as the femur was progressively retroverted. Impingement was reduced in all models by increasing acetabular cup inclination and anteversion, yet this consequentially led to higher contact pressures. At 90° of hip flexion, contact pressures and contact areas were inversely related and showed most notable change with 30° of femoral retroversion. In this model, the contact area migrated towards the anterior implant-bone interface along the femoral neck. CONCLUSION: Femoral retroversion in HRA influences impingement and increases joint contact pressure most when the hip is loaded in flexion. Increasing acetabular inclination decreases the area of impingement but doing so causes a reciprocal increase in joint contact pressure. It may be advisable to study femoral neck version pre-operatively to better choose hip resurfacing arthroplasty candidates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8158908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81589082021-06-09 Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics Bourget-Murray, Jonathan Taneja, Ashish Naserkhaki, Sadegh El-Rich, Marwan Adeeb, Samer Powell, James Johnston, Kelly PLoS One Research Article AIM: How reduced femoral neck anteversion alters the distribution of pressure and contact area in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (HRA) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively describe the biomechanical implication of different femoral neck version angles on HRA using a finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of sixty models were constructed to assess the effect of different femoral neck version angles on three different functional loads: 0°of hip flexion, 45°of hip flexion, and 90° of hip flexion. Femoral version was varied between 30° of anteversion to 30° of retroversion. All models were tested with the acetabular cup in four different positions: (1) 40°/15° (inclination/version), (2) 40°/25°, (3) 50°/15°, and (4) 50°/25°. Differences in range of motion due to presence of impingement, joint contact pressure, and joint contact area with different femoral versions and acetabular cup positions were calculated. RESULTS: Impingement was found to be most significant with the femur in 30° of retroversion, regardless of acetabular cup position. Anterior hip impingement occurred earlier during hip flexion as the femur was progressively retroverted. Impingement was reduced in all models by increasing acetabular cup inclination and anteversion, yet this consequentially led to higher contact pressures. At 90° of hip flexion, contact pressures and contact areas were inversely related and showed most notable change with 30° of femoral retroversion. In this model, the contact area migrated towards the anterior implant-bone interface along the femoral neck. CONCLUSION: Femoral retroversion in HRA influences impingement and increases joint contact pressure most when the hip is loaded in flexion. Increasing acetabular inclination decreases the area of impingement but doing so causes a reciprocal increase in joint contact pressure. It may be advisable to study femoral neck version pre-operatively to better choose hip resurfacing arthroplasty candidates. Public Library of Science 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8158908/ /pubmed/34043721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252435 Text en © 2021 Bourget-Murray et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bourget-Murray, Jonathan
Taneja, Ashish
Naserkhaki, Sadegh
El-Rich, Marwan
Adeeb, Samer
Powell, James
Johnston, Kelly
Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics
title Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics
title_full Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics
title_fullStr Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics
title_full_unstemmed Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics
title_short Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics
title_sort computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8158908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252435
work_keys_str_mv AT bourgetmurrayjonathan computationalmodellingofhipresurfacingarthroplastyinvestigatingtheeffectoffemoralversiononhipbiomechanics
AT tanejaashish computationalmodellingofhipresurfacingarthroplastyinvestigatingtheeffectoffemoralversiononhipbiomechanics
AT naserkhakisadegh computationalmodellingofhipresurfacingarthroplastyinvestigatingtheeffectoffemoralversiononhipbiomechanics
AT elrichmarwan computationalmodellingofhipresurfacingarthroplastyinvestigatingtheeffectoffemoralversiononhipbiomechanics
AT adeebsamer computationalmodellingofhipresurfacingarthroplastyinvestigatingtheeffectoffemoralversiononhipbiomechanics
AT powelljames computationalmodellingofhipresurfacingarthroplastyinvestigatingtheeffectoffemoralversiononhipbiomechanics
AT johnstonkelly computationalmodellingofhipresurfacingarthroplastyinvestigatingtheeffectoffemoralversiononhipbiomechanics