Cargando…
A Study to Evaluate Intrathecal 1% Chloroprocaine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine in Perianal Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Study
BACKGROUND: With increasing focus on outpatient care, there has been an increased demand for short-acting spinal anesthetics, facilitating early recovery and mobilization of the patient. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare 1% chloroprocaine, characterized by short latency and short duration wi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34092850 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_2_21 |
_version_ | 1783699992807997440 |
---|---|
author | Bhaskara, B. Shruthi, S. Ramachandraiah, R. |
author_facet | Bhaskara, B. Shruthi, S. Ramachandraiah, R. |
author_sort | Bhaskara, B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With increasing focus on outpatient care, there has been an increased demand for short-acting spinal anesthetics, facilitating early recovery and mobilization of the patient. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare 1% chloroprocaine, characterized by short latency and short duration with 0.5% levobupivacaine, which has shown to preserve motor function at low concentrations, with recovery from motor block as the primary objective and recovery from sensory block and hemodynamic stability as secondary objectives. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A prospective study to evaluate newer isobaric chloroprocaine and levobupivacaine intrathecally in a cohort of patients using randomization and double blinding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status Classes I and II patients undergoing perianal surgeries were randomly divided into Group C (n = 30) receiving intrathecal 1% chloroprocaine 3 mL and Group L (n = 30) receiving 0.5% levobupivacaine 1.5 mL. Patients were assessed for sensory and motor block characteristics, hemodynamic changes, period of analgesia, time for ambulation, and urination. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Qualitative data were analyzed using Chi-square test and quantitative data using Independent t-test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in highest sensory level, onset of motor block, maximum Bromage scale achieved, and hemodynamic changes between the two groups. There was a significant difference in mean Time for Maximum Bromage scale, Time for Sensory regression (Lumbar-L(1)), Duration of Motor Block (Group C 50.7 ± 5.7 min and Group L 181 ± 27.8 min), Time for rescue Analgesia, Time for 1(st) void, and Time for ambulation (Group C 88.3 ± 9.1 min and Group L(2) 06.7 ± 27.2 min) between chloroprocaine and levobupivacaine group. The above duration was shorter in chloroprocaine group than in levobupivacaine group. CONCLUSION: Thus, chloroprocaine provides good surgical anesthesia and early motor recovery than levobupivacaine and is well suited for day care surgeries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8159029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81590292021-06-04 A Study to Evaluate Intrathecal 1% Chloroprocaine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine in Perianal Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Study Bhaskara, B. Shruthi, S. Ramachandraiah, R. Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: With increasing focus on outpatient care, there has been an increased demand for short-acting spinal anesthetics, facilitating early recovery and mobilization of the patient. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare 1% chloroprocaine, characterized by short latency and short duration with 0.5% levobupivacaine, which has shown to preserve motor function at low concentrations, with recovery from motor block as the primary objective and recovery from sensory block and hemodynamic stability as secondary objectives. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A prospective study to evaluate newer isobaric chloroprocaine and levobupivacaine intrathecally in a cohort of patients using randomization and double blinding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status Classes I and II patients undergoing perianal surgeries were randomly divided into Group C (n = 30) receiving intrathecal 1% chloroprocaine 3 mL and Group L (n = 30) receiving 0.5% levobupivacaine 1.5 mL. Patients were assessed for sensory and motor block characteristics, hemodynamic changes, period of analgesia, time for ambulation, and urination. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Qualitative data were analyzed using Chi-square test and quantitative data using Independent t-test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in highest sensory level, onset of motor block, maximum Bromage scale achieved, and hemodynamic changes between the two groups. There was a significant difference in mean Time for Maximum Bromage scale, Time for Sensory regression (Lumbar-L(1)), Duration of Motor Block (Group C 50.7 ± 5.7 min and Group L 181 ± 27.8 min), Time for rescue Analgesia, Time for 1(st) void, and Time for ambulation (Group C 88.3 ± 9.1 min and Group L(2) 06.7 ± 27.2 min) between chloroprocaine and levobupivacaine group. The above duration was shorter in chloroprocaine group than in levobupivacaine group. CONCLUSION: Thus, chloroprocaine provides good surgical anesthesia and early motor recovery than levobupivacaine and is well suited for day care surgeries. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2021-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8159029/ /pubmed/34092850 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_2_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bhaskara, B. Shruthi, S. Ramachandraiah, R. A Study to Evaluate Intrathecal 1% Chloroprocaine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine in Perianal Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title | A Study to Evaluate Intrathecal 1% Chloroprocaine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine in Perianal Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_full | A Study to Evaluate Intrathecal 1% Chloroprocaine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine in Perianal Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_fullStr | A Study to Evaluate Intrathecal 1% Chloroprocaine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine in Perianal Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Study to Evaluate Intrathecal 1% Chloroprocaine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine in Perianal Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_short | A Study to Evaluate Intrathecal 1% Chloroprocaine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine in Perianal Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_sort | study to evaluate intrathecal 1% chloroprocaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine in perianal surgeries: a prospective randomized study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34092850 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_2_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhaskarab astudytoevaluateintrathecal1chloroprocaineand05levobupivacaineinperianalsurgeriesaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT shruthis astudytoevaluateintrathecal1chloroprocaineand05levobupivacaineinperianalsurgeriesaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT ramachandraiahr astudytoevaluateintrathecal1chloroprocaineand05levobupivacaineinperianalsurgeriesaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT bhaskarab studytoevaluateintrathecal1chloroprocaineand05levobupivacaineinperianalsurgeriesaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT shruthis studytoevaluateintrathecal1chloroprocaineand05levobupivacaineinperianalsurgeriesaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT ramachandraiahr studytoevaluateintrathecal1chloroprocaineand05levobupivacaineinperianalsurgeriesaprospectiverandomizedstudy |