Cargando…

Comparison of Videolaryngoscope and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway for Tracheal Intubation with Manual-in-line Stabilization in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery

BACKGROUND: This prospective, randomized study compared CMAC(®) videolaryngoscope with intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) for intubation under manual-in-line-stabilization (MILS) in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. Settings and Design: Sixty-five ASA Physical Status Classes I and II...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jakhar, Reena, Saigal, Deepti, Kale, Suniti, Aggarwal, Shipra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34092863
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_90_20
_version_ 1783699997303242752
author Jakhar, Reena
Saigal, Deepti
Kale, Suniti
Aggarwal, Shipra
author_facet Jakhar, Reena
Saigal, Deepti
Kale, Suniti
Aggarwal, Shipra
author_sort Jakhar, Reena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This prospective, randomized study compared CMAC(®) videolaryngoscope with intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) for intubation under manual-in-line-stabilization (MILS) in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. Settings and Design: Sixty-five ASA Physical Status Classes I and II patients aged 18–65 years undergoing elective cervical spine surgery were randomly allocated into two groups: group CM-intubation with CMAC(®) videolaryngoscope (n = 33) and Group IL-intubation using ILMA (n = 32). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intubation was performed in all patients after the application of MILS. The primary outcomes included first attempt and overall intubation success rate, intubation time, and apnea time. The secondary objectives were degree of head movement, hemodynamic response, incidence of desaturation, sore throat, and tissue injury. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Normality of data was tested by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Quantitative variables were compared using the unpaired t-test or Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney test and qualitative variables were compared using the Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: CM group had a higher first attempt (96.97%, P = 0.054) and overall (100%, P = 0.053) intubation success rate than IL group (81.25% and 87.5%, respectively). Group CM had a significantly shorter (P < 0.0001) intubation time (33.13 ± 11.82 s) than IL group (55.71 ± 19.28 s), but group CM had significantly longer (P < 0.0001) apnea time (33.13 ± 11.82 s) than IL group (22.03 ± 7.14 s). The incidence of head movement was significantly lower in IL group (P = 0.011). Hypoxemia did not occur. Postintubation hemodynamic changes and tissue injury were significantly higher in ILMA group. CONCLUSION: CMAC group had higher intubation success rate and significantly shorter intubation time. However, ILMA group had a significantly shorter apnea time and significantly lower incidence of head movements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8159048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81590482021-06-04 Comparison of Videolaryngoscope and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway for Tracheal Intubation with Manual-in-line Stabilization in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery Jakhar, Reena Saigal, Deepti Kale, Suniti Aggarwal, Shipra Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: This prospective, randomized study compared CMAC(®) videolaryngoscope with intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) for intubation under manual-in-line-stabilization (MILS) in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. Settings and Design: Sixty-five ASA Physical Status Classes I and II patients aged 18–65 years undergoing elective cervical spine surgery were randomly allocated into two groups: group CM-intubation with CMAC(®) videolaryngoscope (n = 33) and Group IL-intubation using ILMA (n = 32). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intubation was performed in all patients after the application of MILS. The primary outcomes included first attempt and overall intubation success rate, intubation time, and apnea time. The secondary objectives were degree of head movement, hemodynamic response, incidence of desaturation, sore throat, and tissue injury. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Normality of data was tested by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Quantitative variables were compared using the unpaired t-test or Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney test and qualitative variables were compared using the Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: CM group had a higher first attempt (96.97%, P = 0.054) and overall (100%, P = 0.053) intubation success rate than IL group (81.25% and 87.5%, respectively). Group CM had a significantly shorter (P < 0.0001) intubation time (33.13 ± 11.82 s) than IL group (55.71 ± 19.28 s), but group CM had significantly longer (P < 0.0001) apnea time (33.13 ± 11.82 s) than IL group (22.03 ± 7.14 s). The incidence of head movement was significantly lower in IL group (P = 0.011). Hypoxemia did not occur. Postintubation hemodynamic changes and tissue injury were significantly higher in ILMA group. CONCLUSION: CMAC group had higher intubation success rate and significantly shorter intubation time. However, ILMA group had a significantly shorter apnea time and significantly lower incidence of head movements. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8159048/ /pubmed/34092863 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_90_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jakhar, Reena
Saigal, Deepti
Kale, Suniti
Aggarwal, Shipra
Comparison of Videolaryngoscope and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway for Tracheal Intubation with Manual-in-line Stabilization in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery
title Comparison of Videolaryngoscope and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway for Tracheal Intubation with Manual-in-line Stabilization in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery
title_full Comparison of Videolaryngoscope and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway for Tracheal Intubation with Manual-in-line Stabilization in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of Videolaryngoscope and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway for Tracheal Intubation with Manual-in-line Stabilization in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Videolaryngoscope and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway for Tracheal Intubation with Manual-in-line Stabilization in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery
title_short Comparison of Videolaryngoscope and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway for Tracheal Intubation with Manual-in-line Stabilization in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery
title_sort comparison of videolaryngoscope and intubating laryngeal mask airway for tracheal intubation with manual-in-line stabilization in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34092863
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_90_20
work_keys_str_mv AT jakharreena comparisonofvideolaryngoscopeandintubatinglaryngealmaskairwayfortrachealintubationwithmanualinlinestabilizationinpatientsundergoingcervicalspinesurgery
AT saigaldeepti comparisonofvideolaryngoscopeandintubatinglaryngealmaskairwayfortrachealintubationwithmanualinlinestabilizationinpatientsundergoingcervicalspinesurgery
AT kalesuniti comparisonofvideolaryngoscopeandintubatinglaryngealmaskairwayfortrachealintubationwithmanualinlinestabilizationinpatientsundergoingcervicalspinesurgery
AT aggarwalshipra comparisonofvideolaryngoscopeandintubatinglaryngealmaskairwayfortrachealintubationwithmanualinlinestabilizationinpatientsundergoingcervicalspinesurgery