Cargando…

Comparison of Oral Clonidine and Gabapentin Premedication for Attenuation of Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation

BACKGROUND: During the administration of general anesthesia, direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation cause an increase in heart rate, arterial pressure, and dysrhythmias in upto 90% of patients. These changes can be particularly hazardous for patients with cerebral or coronary diseases. Both...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Vaishali, Fotedar, Kamal, Goel, Ravi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34092851
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_114_20
_version_ 1783699999425560576
author Sharma, Vaishali
Fotedar, Kamal
Goel, Ravi
author_facet Sharma, Vaishali
Fotedar, Kamal
Goel, Ravi
author_sort Sharma, Vaishali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the administration of general anesthesia, direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation cause an increase in heart rate, arterial pressure, and dysrhythmias in upto 90% of patients. These changes can be particularly hazardous for patients with cerebral or coronary diseases. Both clonidine and gabapentin have been used for anesthetic effects, but a better drug for controlling hemodynamic parameters is being investigated. AIMS: The study was done to evaluate and compare the efficacy of oral clonidine 0.3 mg and oral gabapentin 900 mg as a premedication for attenuation of pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After obtaining approval from the ethics committee, 75 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classes I and II between the ages of 18 and 60 years scheduled to undergo elective noncardiac surgical procedure were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomized into three groups of 25 each who received 0.3 mg clonidine, 900 mg gabapentin, and placebo. The hemodynamic parameters were recorded at various time intervals along with any adverse effects. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Quantitative variables were compared using unpaired t-test between the two groups and ANOVA for three groups. Qualitative variables were compared using the Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In our study, we found that both clonidine and gabapentin are effective premedicants by oral route 2 h before induction of anesthesia to blunt the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation as compared to placebo. Between clonidine and gabapentin, clonidine was found to be more effective with respect to blunting of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP), although found to be statistically significant only at 15 min with respect to SBP and DBP. CONCLUSION: Using clonidine or gabapentin, one can effectively provide stable hemodynamic conditions during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation, but more so with clonidine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8159057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81590572021-06-04 Comparison of Oral Clonidine and Gabapentin Premedication for Attenuation of Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation Sharma, Vaishali Fotedar, Kamal Goel, Ravi Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: During the administration of general anesthesia, direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation cause an increase in heart rate, arterial pressure, and dysrhythmias in upto 90% of patients. These changes can be particularly hazardous for patients with cerebral or coronary diseases. Both clonidine and gabapentin have been used for anesthetic effects, but a better drug for controlling hemodynamic parameters is being investigated. AIMS: The study was done to evaluate and compare the efficacy of oral clonidine 0.3 mg and oral gabapentin 900 mg as a premedication for attenuation of pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After obtaining approval from the ethics committee, 75 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classes I and II between the ages of 18 and 60 years scheduled to undergo elective noncardiac surgical procedure were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomized into three groups of 25 each who received 0.3 mg clonidine, 900 mg gabapentin, and placebo. The hemodynamic parameters were recorded at various time intervals along with any adverse effects. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Quantitative variables were compared using unpaired t-test between the two groups and ANOVA for three groups. Qualitative variables were compared using the Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In our study, we found that both clonidine and gabapentin are effective premedicants by oral route 2 h before induction of anesthesia to blunt the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation as compared to placebo. Between clonidine and gabapentin, clonidine was found to be more effective with respect to blunting of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP), although found to be statistically significant only at 15 min with respect to SBP and DBP. CONCLUSION: Using clonidine or gabapentin, one can effectively provide stable hemodynamic conditions during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation, but more so with clonidine. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2021-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8159057/ /pubmed/34092851 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_114_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Vaishali
Fotedar, Kamal
Goel, Ravi
Comparison of Oral Clonidine and Gabapentin Premedication for Attenuation of Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation
title Comparison of Oral Clonidine and Gabapentin Premedication for Attenuation of Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation
title_full Comparison of Oral Clonidine and Gabapentin Premedication for Attenuation of Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation
title_fullStr Comparison of Oral Clonidine and Gabapentin Premedication for Attenuation of Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Oral Clonidine and Gabapentin Premedication for Attenuation of Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation
title_short Comparison of Oral Clonidine and Gabapentin Premedication for Attenuation of Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation
title_sort comparison of oral clonidine and gabapentin premedication for attenuation of pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34092851
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_114_20
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmavaishali comparisonoforalclonidineandgabapentinpremedicationforattenuationofpressorresponsetolaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubation
AT fotedarkamal comparisonoforalclonidineandgabapentinpremedicationforattenuationofpressorresponsetolaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubation
AT goelravi comparisonoforalclonidineandgabapentinpremedicationforattenuationofpressorresponsetolaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubation