Cargando…

Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott)

Taro is important for its nutritional content, medicinal use, and bioethanol production. The aim of the present study was to compare different semi-automated bioreactors (SABs) during in vitro multiplication of C. esculenta. The SABs used were temporary immersion bioreactors (TIBs), SETIS™ bioreacto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mancilla-Álvarez, Eucario, Pérez-Sato, Juan Antonio, Núñez-Pastrana, Rosalía, Spinoso-Castillo, José L., Bello-Bello, Jericó J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069416
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10051010
_version_ 1783700018908102656
author Mancilla-Álvarez, Eucario
Pérez-Sato, Juan Antonio
Núñez-Pastrana, Rosalía
Spinoso-Castillo, José L.
Bello-Bello, Jericó J.
author_facet Mancilla-Álvarez, Eucario
Pérez-Sato, Juan Antonio
Núñez-Pastrana, Rosalía
Spinoso-Castillo, José L.
Bello-Bello, Jericó J.
author_sort Mancilla-Álvarez, Eucario
collection PubMed
description Taro is important for its nutritional content, medicinal use, and bioethanol production. The aim of the present study was to compare different semi-automated bioreactors (SABs) during in vitro multiplication of C. esculenta. The SABs used were temporary immersion bioreactors (TIBs), SETIS™ bioreactors and ebb-and-flow bioreactors; semi-solid culture medium was used as a control treatment. At 30 d of culture, different developmental variables, determination of chlorophyll, stomatal content, and survival percentage during acclimatization were evaluated. SABs increased the shoot multiplication rate relative to the semi-solid medium; however, the SETIS™ bioreactor showed the highest shoot production, with 36 shoots per explant, and the highest chlorophyll content. The stomatal index was higher in the semi-solid medium compared to the SABs, while the percentage of closed stomata was higher in the SABs than in the semi-solid culture medium. The survival rate during acclimatization showed no differences among the culture systems assessed, obtaining survival rates higher than 99%. In conclusion, the SETIS™ bioreactor showed the highest multiplication rate; however, other bioreactor alternatives are available for semi-automation and cost reduction for micropropagation of C. esculenta.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8159139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81591392021-05-28 Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) Mancilla-Álvarez, Eucario Pérez-Sato, Juan Antonio Núñez-Pastrana, Rosalía Spinoso-Castillo, José L. Bello-Bello, Jericó J. Plants (Basel) Article Taro is important for its nutritional content, medicinal use, and bioethanol production. The aim of the present study was to compare different semi-automated bioreactors (SABs) during in vitro multiplication of C. esculenta. The SABs used were temporary immersion bioreactors (TIBs), SETIS™ bioreactors and ebb-and-flow bioreactors; semi-solid culture medium was used as a control treatment. At 30 d of culture, different developmental variables, determination of chlorophyll, stomatal content, and survival percentage during acclimatization were evaluated. SABs increased the shoot multiplication rate relative to the semi-solid medium; however, the SETIS™ bioreactor showed the highest shoot production, with 36 shoots per explant, and the highest chlorophyll content. The stomatal index was higher in the semi-solid medium compared to the SABs, while the percentage of closed stomata was higher in the SABs than in the semi-solid culture medium. The survival rate during acclimatization showed no differences among the culture systems assessed, obtaining survival rates higher than 99%. In conclusion, the SETIS™ bioreactor showed the highest multiplication rate; however, other bioreactor alternatives are available for semi-automation and cost reduction for micropropagation of C. esculenta. MDPI 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8159139/ /pubmed/34069416 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10051010 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mancilla-Álvarez, Eucario
Pérez-Sato, Juan Antonio
Núñez-Pastrana, Rosalía
Spinoso-Castillo, José L.
Bello-Bello, Jericó J.
Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott)
title Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott)
title_full Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott)
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott)
title_short Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott)
title_sort comparison of different semi-automated bioreactors for in vitro propagation of taro (colocasia esculenta l. schott)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069416
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10051010
work_keys_str_mv AT mancillaalvarezeucario comparisonofdifferentsemiautomatedbioreactorsforinvitropropagationoftarocolocasiaesculentalschott
AT perezsatojuanantonio comparisonofdifferentsemiautomatedbioreactorsforinvitropropagationoftarocolocasiaesculentalschott
AT nunezpastranarosalia comparisonofdifferentsemiautomatedbioreactorsforinvitropropagationoftarocolocasiaesculentalschott
AT spinosocastillojosel comparisonofdifferentsemiautomatedbioreactorsforinvitropropagationoftarocolocasiaesculentalschott
AT bellobellojericoj comparisonofdifferentsemiautomatedbioreactorsforinvitropropagationoftarocolocasiaesculentalschott