Cargando…
Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott)
Taro is important for its nutritional content, medicinal use, and bioethanol production. The aim of the present study was to compare different semi-automated bioreactors (SABs) during in vitro multiplication of C. esculenta. The SABs used were temporary immersion bioreactors (TIBs), SETIS™ bioreacto...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069416 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10051010 |
_version_ | 1783700018908102656 |
---|---|
author | Mancilla-Álvarez, Eucario Pérez-Sato, Juan Antonio Núñez-Pastrana, Rosalía Spinoso-Castillo, José L. Bello-Bello, Jericó J. |
author_facet | Mancilla-Álvarez, Eucario Pérez-Sato, Juan Antonio Núñez-Pastrana, Rosalía Spinoso-Castillo, José L. Bello-Bello, Jericó J. |
author_sort | Mancilla-Álvarez, Eucario |
collection | PubMed |
description | Taro is important for its nutritional content, medicinal use, and bioethanol production. The aim of the present study was to compare different semi-automated bioreactors (SABs) during in vitro multiplication of C. esculenta. The SABs used were temporary immersion bioreactors (TIBs), SETIS™ bioreactors and ebb-and-flow bioreactors; semi-solid culture medium was used as a control treatment. At 30 d of culture, different developmental variables, determination of chlorophyll, stomatal content, and survival percentage during acclimatization were evaluated. SABs increased the shoot multiplication rate relative to the semi-solid medium; however, the SETIS™ bioreactor showed the highest shoot production, with 36 shoots per explant, and the highest chlorophyll content. The stomatal index was higher in the semi-solid medium compared to the SABs, while the percentage of closed stomata was higher in the SABs than in the semi-solid culture medium. The survival rate during acclimatization showed no differences among the culture systems assessed, obtaining survival rates higher than 99%. In conclusion, the SETIS™ bioreactor showed the highest multiplication rate; however, other bioreactor alternatives are available for semi-automation and cost reduction for micropropagation of C. esculenta. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8159139 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81591392021-05-28 Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) Mancilla-Álvarez, Eucario Pérez-Sato, Juan Antonio Núñez-Pastrana, Rosalía Spinoso-Castillo, José L. Bello-Bello, Jericó J. Plants (Basel) Article Taro is important for its nutritional content, medicinal use, and bioethanol production. The aim of the present study was to compare different semi-automated bioreactors (SABs) during in vitro multiplication of C. esculenta. The SABs used were temporary immersion bioreactors (TIBs), SETIS™ bioreactors and ebb-and-flow bioreactors; semi-solid culture medium was used as a control treatment. At 30 d of culture, different developmental variables, determination of chlorophyll, stomatal content, and survival percentage during acclimatization were evaluated. SABs increased the shoot multiplication rate relative to the semi-solid medium; however, the SETIS™ bioreactor showed the highest shoot production, with 36 shoots per explant, and the highest chlorophyll content. The stomatal index was higher in the semi-solid medium compared to the SABs, while the percentage of closed stomata was higher in the SABs than in the semi-solid culture medium. The survival rate during acclimatization showed no differences among the culture systems assessed, obtaining survival rates higher than 99%. In conclusion, the SETIS™ bioreactor showed the highest multiplication rate; however, other bioreactor alternatives are available for semi-automation and cost reduction for micropropagation of C. esculenta. MDPI 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8159139/ /pubmed/34069416 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10051010 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mancilla-Álvarez, Eucario Pérez-Sato, Juan Antonio Núñez-Pastrana, Rosalía Spinoso-Castillo, José L. Bello-Bello, Jericó J. Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) |
title | Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) |
title_full | Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) |
title_short | Comparison of Different Semi-Automated Bioreactors for In Vitro Propagation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) |
title_sort | comparison of different semi-automated bioreactors for in vitro propagation of taro (colocasia esculenta l. schott) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069416 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10051010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mancillaalvarezeucario comparisonofdifferentsemiautomatedbioreactorsforinvitropropagationoftarocolocasiaesculentalschott AT perezsatojuanantonio comparisonofdifferentsemiautomatedbioreactorsforinvitropropagationoftarocolocasiaesculentalschott AT nunezpastranarosalia comparisonofdifferentsemiautomatedbioreactorsforinvitropropagationoftarocolocasiaesculentalschott AT spinosocastillojosel comparisonofdifferentsemiautomatedbioreactorsforinvitropropagationoftarocolocasiaesculentalschott AT bellobellojericoj comparisonofdifferentsemiautomatedbioreactorsforinvitropropagationoftarocolocasiaesculentalschott |