Cargando…
Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of specimens from solid lesions acquired during EUS-FNB: multicenter study and comparison between needle gauges
Background and study aims The standard method for obtaining samples during endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is fine-needle aspiration (FNA), the accuracy of which can be affected by the presence of a cytopathologist in endoscopy room (rapid on-site evaluation [ROSE]). With the introduction of fine-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1395-7129 |
_version_ | 1783700119829348352 |
---|---|
author | Mangiavillano, Benedetto Frazzoni, Leonardo Togliani, Thomas Fabbri, Carlo Tarantino, Ilaria De Luca, Luca Staiano, Teresa Binda, Cecilia Signoretti, Marianna Eusebi, Leonardo H. Auriemma, Francesco Lamonaca, Laura Paduano, Danilo Di Leo, Milena Carrara, Silvia Fuccio, Lorenzo Repici, Alessandro |
author_facet | Mangiavillano, Benedetto Frazzoni, Leonardo Togliani, Thomas Fabbri, Carlo Tarantino, Ilaria De Luca, Luca Staiano, Teresa Binda, Cecilia Signoretti, Marianna Eusebi, Leonardo H. Auriemma, Francesco Lamonaca, Laura Paduano, Danilo Di Leo, Milena Carrara, Silvia Fuccio, Lorenzo Repici, Alessandro |
author_sort | Mangiavillano, Benedetto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims The standard method for obtaining samples during endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is fine-needle aspiration (FNA), the accuracy of which can be affected by the presence of a cytopathologist in endoscopy room (rapid on-site evaluation [ROSE]). With the introduction of fine-needle biopsy (FNB), macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of a acquired specimen has been proposed. Only a few studies have evaluated the role of MOSE and in all except one, a 19G needle was used. Our primary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and accuracy of MOSE with different needle sizes and the secondary aim was to identify factors influencing the yield of MOSE. Patients and methods Data from patients who underwent EUS-FNB for solid lesions, with MOSE evaluation of the specimen, were collected in six endoscopic referral centers. Results A total of 378 patients (145 F and 233 M) were enrolled. Needles sizes used during the procedures were 20G (42 %), 22G (45 %), and 25G (13 %). The median number of needle passes was two (IQR 2–3). The overall diagnostic yield of MOSE was of 90 % (confidence interval [CI] 86 %–92 %). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, variables independently associated with the diagnostic yield of MOSE were a larger needle diameter (20G vs. 25G, OR 11.64, 95 %CI 3.5–38.71; 22G vs. 25G, OR 6.20, 95 %CI 2.41–15.90) and three of more needle passes (OR 3.39, 95 %CI 1.38–8.31). Conclusions MOSE showed high diagnostic yield and accuracy. Its yield was further increased if performed with a large size FNB needles and more than two passes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8159577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81595772021-06-01 Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of specimens from solid lesions acquired during EUS-FNB: multicenter study and comparison between needle gauges Mangiavillano, Benedetto Frazzoni, Leonardo Togliani, Thomas Fabbri, Carlo Tarantino, Ilaria De Luca, Luca Staiano, Teresa Binda, Cecilia Signoretti, Marianna Eusebi, Leonardo H. Auriemma, Francesco Lamonaca, Laura Paduano, Danilo Di Leo, Milena Carrara, Silvia Fuccio, Lorenzo Repici, Alessandro Endosc Int Open Background and study aims The standard method for obtaining samples during endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is fine-needle aspiration (FNA), the accuracy of which can be affected by the presence of a cytopathologist in endoscopy room (rapid on-site evaluation [ROSE]). With the introduction of fine-needle biopsy (FNB), macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of a acquired specimen has been proposed. Only a few studies have evaluated the role of MOSE and in all except one, a 19G needle was used. Our primary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and accuracy of MOSE with different needle sizes and the secondary aim was to identify factors influencing the yield of MOSE. Patients and methods Data from patients who underwent EUS-FNB for solid lesions, with MOSE evaluation of the specimen, were collected in six endoscopic referral centers. Results A total of 378 patients (145 F and 233 M) were enrolled. Needles sizes used during the procedures were 20G (42 %), 22G (45 %), and 25G (13 %). The median number of needle passes was two (IQR 2–3). The overall diagnostic yield of MOSE was of 90 % (confidence interval [CI] 86 %–92 %). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, variables independently associated with the diagnostic yield of MOSE were a larger needle diameter (20G vs. 25G, OR 11.64, 95 %CI 3.5–38.71; 22G vs. 25G, OR 6.20, 95 %CI 2.41–15.90) and three of more needle passes (OR 3.39, 95 %CI 1.38–8.31). Conclusions MOSE showed high diagnostic yield and accuracy. Its yield was further increased if performed with a large size FNB needles and more than two passes. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-06 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8159577/ /pubmed/34079874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1395-7129 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Mangiavillano, Benedetto Frazzoni, Leonardo Togliani, Thomas Fabbri, Carlo Tarantino, Ilaria De Luca, Luca Staiano, Teresa Binda, Cecilia Signoretti, Marianna Eusebi, Leonardo H. Auriemma, Francesco Lamonaca, Laura Paduano, Danilo Di Leo, Milena Carrara, Silvia Fuccio, Lorenzo Repici, Alessandro Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of specimens from solid lesions acquired during EUS-FNB: multicenter study and comparison between needle gauges |
title | Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of specimens from solid lesions acquired during EUS-FNB: multicenter study and comparison between needle gauges |
title_full | Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of specimens from solid lesions acquired during EUS-FNB: multicenter study and comparison between needle gauges |
title_fullStr | Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of specimens from solid lesions acquired during EUS-FNB: multicenter study and comparison between needle gauges |
title_full_unstemmed | Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of specimens from solid lesions acquired during EUS-FNB: multicenter study and comparison between needle gauges |
title_short | Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of specimens from solid lesions acquired during EUS-FNB: multicenter study and comparison between needle gauges |
title_sort | macroscopic on-site evaluation (mose) of specimens from solid lesions acquired during eus-fnb: multicenter study and comparison between needle gauges |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1395-7129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mangiavillanobenedetto macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges AT frazzonileonardo macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges AT toglianithomas macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges AT fabbricarlo macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges AT tarantinoilaria macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges AT delucaluca macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges AT staianoteresa macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges AT bindacecilia macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges AT signorettimarianna macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges AT eusebileonardoh macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges AT auriemmafrancesco macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges AT lamonacalaura macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges AT paduanodanilo macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges AT dileomilena macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges AT carrarasilvia macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges AT fucciolorenzo macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges AT repicialessandro macroscopiconsiteevaluationmoseofspecimensfromsolidlesionsacquiredduringeusfnbmulticenterstudyandcomparisonbetweenneedlegauges |