Cargando…
Colon capsule endoscopy is a viable alternative to colonoscopy for the investigation of intermediate- and low-risk patients with gastrointestinal symptoms: results of a pilot study
Background and study aims Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a recommended viable alternative to colonoscopy for colonic visualisation in a variety of clinical settings with proven efficacy in polyp detection, surveillance, screening and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) assessment. CCE efficacy in an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1401-9528 |
_version_ | 1783700125883826176 |
---|---|
author | Ismail, Mohd Syafiq Semenov, Serhiy Sihag, Sandeep Manoharan, Thilagaraj Douglas, Atiyekeogbebe Rita Reill, Phyllis Kelly, Michael Boran, Gerard O’Connor, Anthony Breslin, Niall O’Donnell, Sarah Ryan, Barbara McNamara, Deirdre |
author_facet | Ismail, Mohd Syafiq Semenov, Serhiy Sihag, Sandeep Manoharan, Thilagaraj Douglas, Atiyekeogbebe Rita Reill, Phyllis Kelly, Michael Boran, Gerard O’Connor, Anthony Breslin, Niall O’Donnell, Sarah Ryan, Barbara McNamara, Deirdre |
author_sort | Ismail, Mohd Syafiq |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a recommended viable alternative to colonoscopy for colonic visualisation in a variety of clinical settings with proven efficacy in polyp detection, surveillance, screening and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) assessment. CCE efficacy in an unselected average risk symptomatic cohort has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of CCE imaging assessment in average risk symptomatic patients as an alternative to colonoscopy with and without additional biomarker assessment. Patients and methods This was a prospective, single-center comparison study of colonoscopy, CCE and biomarker assessment. Results Of 77 invited subjects, 66 underwent both a CCE and colonoscopy. A fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and fecal calprotectin (FC) were available in 56 and 59 subjects. In all 64 % (n = 42) had any positive finding with 16 (24 %) found to have significant disease (high-risk adenomas, IBD) on colonoscopy. The CCE completion rate was 76 %, five (8 %) had an inadequate preparation, the CCE polyp detection rate was high at 35 %. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of CCE for significant disease were 81 %, 98 %, 93 % and 94 % respectively. In addition, three (5 %) significant small bowel diagnoses were made on CCE. FC and FIT were frequently elevated in patients with both colitis (5/7, 71 %) and high-risk adenomas (4/7 57 %). While both had a low positive predictive value for clinically significant disease, FIT 32 % and FC 26 %. Conclusions CCE is a safe and effective alternative to colonoscopy in symptomatic average risk patients with or without the addition of biomarker screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8159609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81596092021-06-01 Colon capsule endoscopy is a viable alternative to colonoscopy for the investigation of intermediate- and low-risk patients with gastrointestinal symptoms: results of a pilot study Ismail, Mohd Syafiq Semenov, Serhiy Sihag, Sandeep Manoharan, Thilagaraj Douglas, Atiyekeogbebe Rita Reill, Phyllis Kelly, Michael Boran, Gerard O’Connor, Anthony Breslin, Niall O’Donnell, Sarah Ryan, Barbara McNamara, Deirdre Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a recommended viable alternative to colonoscopy for colonic visualisation in a variety of clinical settings with proven efficacy in polyp detection, surveillance, screening and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) assessment. CCE efficacy in an unselected average risk symptomatic cohort has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of CCE imaging assessment in average risk symptomatic patients as an alternative to colonoscopy with and without additional biomarker assessment. Patients and methods This was a prospective, single-center comparison study of colonoscopy, CCE and biomarker assessment. Results Of 77 invited subjects, 66 underwent both a CCE and colonoscopy. A fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and fecal calprotectin (FC) were available in 56 and 59 subjects. In all 64 % (n = 42) had any positive finding with 16 (24 %) found to have significant disease (high-risk adenomas, IBD) on colonoscopy. The CCE completion rate was 76 %, five (8 %) had an inadequate preparation, the CCE polyp detection rate was high at 35 %. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of CCE for significant disease were 81 %, 98 %, 93 % and 94 % respectively. In addition, three (5 %) significant small bowel diagnoses were made on CCE. FC and FIT were frequently elevated in patients with both colitis (5/7, 71 %) and high-risk adenomas (4/7 57 %). While both had a low positive predictive value for clinically significant disease, FIT 32 % and FC 26 %. Conclusions CCE is a safe and effective alternative to colonoscopy in symptomatic average risk patients with or without the addition of biomarker screening. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-06 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8159609/ /pubmed/34079884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1401-9528 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Ismail, Mohd Syafiq Semenov, Serhiy Sihag, Sandeep Manoharan, Thilagaraj Douglas, Atiyekeogbebe Rita Reill, Phyllis Kelly, Michael Boran, Gerard O’Connor, Anthony Breslin, Niall O’Donnell, Sarah Ryan, Barbara McNamara, Deirdre Colon capsule endoscopy is a viable alternative to colonoscopy for the investigation of intermediate- and low-risk patients with gastrointestinal symptoms: results of a pilot study |
title | Colon capsule endoscopy is a viable alternative to colonoscopy for the investigation of intermediate- and low-risk patients with gastrointestinal symptoms: results of a pilot study |
title_full | Colon capsule endoscopy is a viable alternative to colonoscopy for the investigation of intermediate- and low-risk patients with gastrointestinal symptoms: results of a pilot study |
title_fullStr | Colon capsule endoscopy is a viable alternative to colonoscopy for the investigation of intermediate- and low-risk patients with gastrointestinal symptoms: results of a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Colon capsule endoscopy is a viable alternative to colonoscopy for the investigation of intermediate- and low-risk patients with gastrointestinal symptoms: results of a pilot study |
title_short | Colon capsule endoscopy is a viable alternative to colonoscopy for the investigation of intermediate- and low-risk patients with gastrointestinal symptoms: results of a pilot study |
title_sort | colon capsule endoscopy is a viable alternative to colonoscopy for the investigation of intermediate- and low-risk patients with gastrointestinal symptoms: results of a pilot study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1401-9528 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ismailmohdsyafiq coloncapsuleendoscopyisaviablealternativetocolonoscopyfortheinvestigationofintermediateandlowriskpatientswithgastrointestinalsymptomsresultsofapilotstudy AT semenovserhiy coloncapsuleendoscopyisaviablealternativetocolonoscopyfortheinvestigationofintermediateandlowriskpatientswithgastrointestinalsymptomsresultsofapilotstudy AT sihagsandeep coloncapsuleendoscopyisaviablealternativetocolonoscopyfortheinvestigationofintermediateandlowriskpatientswithgastrointestinalsymptomsresultsofapilotstudy AT manoharanthilagaraj coloncapsuleendoscopyisaviablealternativetocolonoscopyfortheinvestigationofintermediateandlowriskpatientswithgastrointestinalsymptomsresultsofapilotstudy AT douglasatiyekeogbeberita coloncapsuleendoscopyisaviablealternativetocolonoscopyfortheinvestigationofintermediateandlowriskpatientswithgastrointestinalsymptomsresultsofapilotstudy AT reillphyllis coloncapsuleendoscopyisaviablealternativetocolonoscopyfortheinvestigationofintermediateandlowriskpatientswithgastrointestinalsymptomsresultsofapilotstudy AT kellymichael coloncapsuleendoscopyisaviablealternativetocolonoscopyfortheinvestigationofintermediateandlowriskpatientswithgastrointestinalsymptomsresultsofapilotstudy AT borangerard coloncapsuleendoscopyisaviablealternativetocolonoscopyfortheinvestigationofintermediateandlowriskpatientswithgastrointestinalsymptomsresultsofapilotstudy AT oconnoranthony coloncapsuleendoscopyisaviablealternativetocolonoscopyfortheinvestigationofintermediateandlowriskpatientswithgastrointestinalsymptomsresultsofapilotstudy AT breslinniall coloncapsuleendoscopyisaviablealternativetocolonoscopyfortheinvestigationofintermediateandlowriskpatientswithgastrointestinalsymptomsresultsofapilotstudy AT odonnellsarah coloncapsuleendoscopyisaviablealternativetocolonoscopyfortheinvestigationofintermediateandlowriskpatientswithgastrointestinalsymptomsresultsofapilotstudy AT ryanbarbara coloncapsuleendoscopyisaviablealternativetocolonoscopyfortheinvestigationofintermediateandlowriskpatientswithgastrointestinalsymptomsresultsofapilotstudy AT mcnamaradeirdre coloncapsuleendoscopyisaviablealternativetocolonoscopyfortheinvestigationofintermediateandlowriskpatientswithgastrointestinalsymptomsresultsofapilotstudy |