Cargando…
Are depressive disorders caused by psychosocial stressors at work? A systematic review with metaanalysis
In the last decade, many studies have examined associations between poor psychosocial work environment and depression. We aimed to assess the evidence for a causal association between psychosocial factors at work and depressive disorders. We conducted a systematic literature search from 1980 to Marc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33580479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00725-9 |
_version_ | 1783700159361712128 |
---|---|
author | Mikkelsen, Sigurd Coggon, David Andersen, Johan Hviid Casey, Patricia Flachs, Esben Meulengracht Kolstad, Henrik Albert Mors, Ole Bonde, Jens Peter |
author_facet | Mikkelsen, Sigurd Coggon, David Andersen, Johan Hviid Casey, Patricia Flachs, Esben Meulengracht Kolstad, Henrik Albert Mors, Ole Bonde, Jens Peter |
author_sort | Mikkelsen, Sigurd |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the last decade, many studies have examined associations between poor psychosocial work environment and depression. We aimed to assess the evidence for a causal association between psychosocial factors at work and depressive disorders. We conducted a systematic literature search from 1980 to March 2019. For all exposures other than night and shift work and long working hours, we limited our selection of studies to those with a longitudinal design. We extracted available risk estimates for each of 19 psychosocial exposures, from which we calculated summary risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals (PROSPERO, identifier CRD42019130266). 54 studies were included, addressing 19 exposures and 11 different measures of depression. Only data on depressive episodes were sufficient for evaluation. Heterogeneity of exposure definitions and ascertainment, outcome measures, risk parameterization and effect contrasts limited the validity of meta-analyses. Summary risk estimates were above unity for all but one exposure, and below 1.60 for all but another. Outcome measures were liable to high rates of false positives, control of relevant confounding was mostly inadequate, and common method bias was likely in a large proportion of studies. The combination of resulting biases is likely to have inflated observed effect estimates. When statistical uncertainties and the potential for bias and confounding are taken into account, it is not possible to conclude with confidence that any of the psychosocial exposures at work included in this review is either likely or unlikely to cause depressive episodes or recurrent depressive disorders. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10654-021-00725-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8159794 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81597942021-06-01 Are depressive disorders caused by psychosocial stressors at work? A systematic review with metaanalysis Mikkelsen, Sigurd Coggon, David Andersen, Johan Hviid Casey, Patricia Flachs, Esben Meulengracht Kolstad, Henrik Albert Mors, Ole Bonde, Jens Peter Eur J Epidemiol Meta-Analysis In the last decade, many studies have examined associations between poor psychosocial work environment and depression. We aimed to assess the evidence for a causal association between psychosocial factors at work and depressive disorders. We conducted a systematic literature search from 1980 to March 2019. For all exposures other than night and shift work and long working hours, we limited our selection of studies to those with a longitudinal design. We extracted available risk estimates for each of 19 psychosocial exposures, from which we calculated summary risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals (PROSPERO, identifier CRD42019130266). 54 studies were included, addressing 19 exposures and 11 different measures of depression. Only data on depressive episodes were sufficient for evaluation. Heterogeneity of exposure definitions and ascertainment, outcome measures, risk parameterization and effect contrasts limited the validity of meta-analyses. Summary risk estimates were above unity for all but one exposure, and below 1.60 for all but another. Outcome measures were liable to high rates of false positives, control of relevant confounding was mostly inadequate, and common method bias was likely in a large proportion of studies. The combination of resulting biases is likely to have inflated observed effect estimates. When statistical uncertainties and the potential for bias and confounding are taken into account, it is not possible to conclude with confidence that any of the psychosocial exposures at work included in this review is either likely or unlikely to cause depressive episodes or recurrent depressive disorders. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10654-021-00725-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2021-02-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8159794/ /pubmed/33580479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00725-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Mikkelsen, Sigurd Coggon, David Andersen, Johan Hviid Casey, Patricia Flachs, Esben Meulengracht Kolstad, Henrik Albert Mors, Ole Bonde, Jens Peter Are depressive disorders caused by psychosocial stressors at work? A systematic review with metaanalysis |
title | Are depressive disorders caused by psychosocial stressors at work? A systematic review with metaanalysis |
title_full | Are depressive disorders caused by psychosocial stressors at work? A systematic review with metaanalysis |
title_fullStr | Are depressive disorders caused by psychosocial stressors at work? A systematic review with metaanalysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Are depressive disorders caused by psychosocial stressors at work? A systematic review with metaanalysis |
title_short | Are depressive disorders caused by psychosocial stressors at work? A systematic review with metaanalysis |
title_sort | are depressive disorders caused by psychosocial stressors at work? a systematic review with metaanalysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33580479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00725-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mikkelsensigurd aredepressivedisorderscausedbypsychosocialstressorsatworkasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT coggondavid aredepressivedisorderscausedbypsychosocialstressorsatworkasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT andersenjohanhviid aredepressivedisorderscausedbypsychosocialstressorsatworkasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT caseypatricia aredepressivedisorderscausedbypsychosocialstressorsatworkasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT flachsesbenmeulengracht aredepressivedisorderscausedbypsychosocialstressorsatworkasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT kolstadhenrikalbert aredepressivedisorderscausedbypsychosocialstressorsatworkasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT morsole aredepressivedisorderscausedbypsychosocialstressorsatworkasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT bondejenspeter aredepressivedisorderscausedbypsychosocialstressorsatworkasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis |