Cargando…

Neural correlates of visual attention during risky decision evidence integration

Value-based decision-making is presumed to involve a dynamic integration process that supports assessing the potential outcomes of different choice options. Decision frameworks assume the value of a decision rests on both the desirability and risk surrounding an outcome. Previous work has highlighte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Purcell, John R., Jahn, Andrew, Fine, Justin M., Brown, Joshua W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117979
_version_ 1783700169762537472
author Purcell, John R.
Jahn, Andrew
Fine, Justin M.
Brown, Joshua W.
author_facet Purcell, John R.
Jahn, Andrew
Fine, Justin M.
Brown, Joshua W.
author_sort Purcell, John R.
collection PubMed
description Value-based decision-making is presumed to involve a dynamic integration process that supports assessing the potential outcomes of different choice options. Decision frameworks assume the value of a decision rests on both the desirability and risk surrounding an outcome. Previous work has highlighted neural representations of risk in the human brain, and their relation to decision choice. Key neural regions including the insula and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) have been implicated in encoding the effects of risk on decision outcomes, including approach and avoidance. Yet, it remains unknown whether these regions are involved in the dynamic integration processes that precede and drive choice, and their relationship with ongoing attention. Here, we used concurrent fMRI and eye-tracking to discern neural activation related to visual attention preceding choice between sure-thing (i.e. safe) and risky gamble options. We found activation in both dorsal ACC (dACC) and posterior insula (PI) scaled in opposite directions with the difference in attention to risky rewards relative to risky losses. PI activation also differentiated foveations on both risky options (rewards and losses) relative to a sure-thing option. These findings point to ACC involvement in ongoing evaluation of risky but higher value options. The role of PI in risky outcomes points to a more general evaluative role in the decision-making that compares both safe and risky outcomes, irrespective of potential for gains or losses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8159858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81598582021-07-01 Neural correlates of visual attention during risky decision evidence integration Purcell, John R. Jahn, Andrew Fine, Justin M. Brown, Joshua W. Neuroimage Article Value-based decision-making is presumed to involve a dynamic integration process that supports assessing the potential outcomes of different choice options. Decision frameworks assume the value of a decision rests on both the desirability and risk surrounding an outcome. Previous work has highlighted neural representations of risk in the human brain, and their relation to decision choice. Key neural regions including the insula and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) have been implicated in encoding the effects of risk on decision outcomes, including approach and avoidance. Yet, it remains unknown whether these regions are involved in the dynamic integration processes that precede and drive choice, and their relationship with ongoing attention. Here, we used concurrent fMRI and eye-tracking to discern neural activation related to visual attention preceding choice between sure-thing (i.e. safe) and risky gamble options. We found activation in both dorsal ACC (dACC) and posterior insula (PI) scaled in opposite directions with the difference in attention to risky rewards relative to risky losses. PI activation also differentiated foveations on both risky options (rewards and losses) relative to a sure-thing option. These findings point to ACC involvement in ongoing evaluation of risky but higher value options. The role of PI in risky outcomes points to a more general evaluative role in the decision-making that compares both safe and risky outcomes, irrespective of potential for gains or losses. 2021-03-23 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8159858/ /pubmed/33771695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117979 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Article
Purcell, John R.
Jahn, Andrew
Fine, Justin M.
Brown, Joshua W.
Neural correlates of visual attention during risky decision evidence integration
title Neural correlates of visual attention during risky decision evidence integration
title_full Neural correlates of visual attention during risky decision evidence integration
title_fullStr Neural correlates of visual attention during risky decision evidence integration
title_full_unstemmed Neural correlates of visual attention during risky decision evidence integration
title_short Neural correlates of visual attention during risky decision evidence integration
title_sort neural correlates of visual attention during risky decision evidence integration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8159858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117979
work_keys_str_mv AT purcelljohnr neuralcorrelatesofvisualattentionduringriskydecisionevidenceintegration
AT jahnandrew neuralcorrelatesofvisualattentionduringriskydecisionevidenceintegration
AT finejustinm neuralcorrelatesofvisualattentionduringriskydecisionevidenceintegration
AT brownjoshuaw neuralcorrelatesofvisualattentionduringriskydecisionevidenceintegration