Cargando…

Understanding Patients’ Willingness to Pay for Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30/70 in a Pen Device for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment in an Out-of-Pocket Payment Market

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate willingness to pay (WTP) for biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in India. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, non-interventional, preference study was conducted that assessed WTP for BIAsp 30 in an in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murthy, Sreenivasa, Aneja, Pankaj, Asirvatham, Arthur Joseph, Husemoen, Lise Lotte N., Rhee, Nicolai A., Kesavadev, Jothydev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33410093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00246-3
_version_ 1783700199359643648
author Murthy, Sreenivasa
Aneja, Pankaj
Asirvatham, Arthur Joseph
Husemoen, Lise Lotte N.
Rhee, Nicolai A.
Kesavadev, Jothydev
author_facet Murthy, Sreenivasa
Aneja, Pankaj
Asirvatham, Arthur Joseph
Husemoen, Lise Lotte N.
Rhee, Nicolai A.
Kesavadev, Jothydev
author_sort Murthy, Sreenivasa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate willingness to pay (WTP) for biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in India. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, non-interventional, preference study was conducted that assessed WTP for BIAsp 30 in an insulin pen (FlexPen(®) or Penfill(®) device) in patients in India with T2DM previously treated with biphasic human insulin (BHI) in vials and believed to be able to pay for treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients willing to continue to pay for BIAsp 30 after 12 weeks’ treatment. Secondary endpoints included the change from baseline in treatment and device satisfaction and patient preferences for treatment attributes as assessed by a nested discrete-choice experiment. RESULTS: Overall, 54.9% (n = 277/505) of participants were male; the mean age was 56.4 years; diabetes duration was 10.9 years; 63.8% had a body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m(2); > 75% had an annual household income > 150,000 Indian rupees (INR). After 12 weeks’ treatment, 96.4% of patients were willing to pay for BIAsp 30. Mean treatment and device satisfaction significantly improved from baseline (p < 0.0001). Patients were willing to pay INR3576 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2755–4398) for improved glycemic control, INR688 (95% CI 383–994) for a device upgrade (vial/syringe to an insulin pen), or INR327 (95% CI 95–560) to avoid major hypoglycemia. Patients would need to be compensated INR44 (95% CI 56–32) per minor hypoglycemic event. CONCLUSIONS: In India, patients with T2DM previously treated with BHI were willing to pay for BIAsp 30 in an insulin pen. Furthermore, treatment and device satisfaction improved after this therapeutic switch. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03374774. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-020-00246-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8160041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81600412021-06-17 Understanding Patients’ Willingness to Pay for Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30/70 in a Pen Device for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment in an Out-of-Pocket Payment Market Murthy, Sreenivasa Aneja, Pankaj Asirvatham, Arthur Joseph Husemoen, Lise Lotte N. Rhee, Nicolai A. Kesavadev, Jothydev Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate willingness to pay (WTP) for biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in India. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, non-interventional, preference study was conducted that assessed WTP for BIAsp 30 in an insulin pen (FlexPen(®) or Penfill(®) device) in patients in India with T2DM previously treated with biphasic human insulin (BHI) in vials and believed to be able to pay for treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients willing to continue to pay for BIAsp 30 after 12 weeks’ treatment. Secondary endpoints included the change from baseline in treatment and device satisfaction and patient preferences for treatment attributes as assessed by a nested discrete-choice experiment. RESULTS: Overall, 54.9% (n = 277/505) of participants were male; the mean age was 56.4 years; diabetes duration was 10.9 years; 63.8% had a body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m(2); > 75% had an annual household income > 150,000 Indian rupees (INR). After 12 weeks’ treatment, 96.4% of patients were willing to pay for BIAsp 30. Mean treatment and device satisfaction significantly improved from baseline (p < 0.0001). Patients were willing to pay INR3576 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2755–4398) for improved glycemic control, INR688 (95% CI 383–994) for a device upgrade (vial/syringe to an insulin pen), or INR327 (95% CI 95–560) to avoid major hypoglycemia. Patients would need to be compensated INR44 (95% CI 56–32) per minor hypoglycemic event. CONCLUSIONS: In India, patients with T2DM previously treated with BHI were willing to pay for BIAsp 30 in an insulin pen. Furthermore, treatment and device satisfaction improved after this therapeutic switch. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03374774. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-020-00246-3. Springer International Publishing 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8160041/ /pubmed/33410093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00246-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Murthy, Sreenivasa
Aneja, Pankaj
Asirvatham, Arthur Joseph
Husemoen, Lise Lotte N.
Rhee, Nicolai A.
Kesavadev, Jothydev
Understanding Patients’ Willingness to Pay for Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30/70 in a Pen Device for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment in an Out-of-Pocket Payment Market
title Understanding Patients’ Willingness to Pay for Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30/70 in a Pen Device for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment in an Out-of-Pocket Payment Market
title_full Understanding Patients’ Willingness to Pay for Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30/70 in a Pen Device for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment in an Out-of-Pocket Payment Market
title_fullStr Understanding Patients’ Willingness to Pay for Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30/70 in a Pen Device for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment in an Out-of-Pocket Payment Market
title_full_unstemmed Understanding Patients’ Willingness to Pay for Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30/70 in a Pen Device for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment in an Out-of-Pocket Payment Market
title_short Understanding Patients’ Willingness to Pay for Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30/70 in a Pen Device for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment in an Out-of-Pocket Payment Market
title_sort understanding patients’ willingness to pay for biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 in a pen device for type 2 diabetes treatment in an out-of-pocket payment market
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33410093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00246-3
work_keys_str_mv AT murthysreenivasa understandingpatientswillingnesstopayforbiphasicinsulinaspart3070inapendevicefortype2diabetestreatmentinanoutofpocketpaymentmarket
AT anejapankaj understandingpatientswillingnesstopayforbiphasicinsulinaspart3070inapendevicefortype2diabetestreatmentinanoutofpocketpaymentmarket
AT asirvathamarthurjoseph understandingpatientswillingnesstopayforbiphasicinsulinaspart3070inapendevicefortype2diabetestreatmentinanoutofpocketpaymentmarket
AT husemoenliselotten understandingpatientswillingnesstopayforbiphasicinsulinaspart3070inapendevicefortype2diabetestreatmentinanoutofpocketpaymentmarket
AT rheenicolaia understandingpatientswillingnesstopayforbiphasicinsulinaspart3070inapendevicefortype2diabetestreatmentinanoutofpocketpaymentmarket
AT kesavadevjothydev understandingpatientswillingnesstopayforbiphasicinsulinaspart3070inapendevicefortype2diabetestreatmentinanoutofpocketpaymentmarket