Cargando…

Cost-minimization modeling of venous thromboembolism diagnostics: performing limited compression ultrasound in primary health care reduces costs compared to referring patients to a hospital

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether diagnosing a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in primary health care using limited compression ultrasound (LCUS) can save resources compared to referring these patients to hospital. According to the current literature, LCUS is as s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hannula, Ossi, Mustonen, Anssi, Rautiainen, Suvi, Vanninen, Ritva, Hyppölä, Harri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34046805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00227-5
_version_ 1783700200827650048
author Hannula, Ossi
Mustonen, Anssi
Rautiainen, Suvi
Vanninen, Ritva
Hyppölä, Harri
author_facet Hannula, Ossi
Mustonen, Anssi
Rautiainen, Suvi
Vanninen, Ritva
Hyppölä, Harri
author_sort Hannula, Ossi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether diagnosing a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in primary health care using limited compression ultrasound (LCUS) can save resources compared to referring these patients to hospital. According to the current literature, LCUS is as safe as a standard protocol based on a whole-leg ultrasound (US). METHODS: We created a standardized patient for this cost-analysis model based on 76 patients that were referred to hospital for a suspected DVT. Travel distance to the health care centre and hospital was calculated based on the home address. Hospital costs were acquired from the hospital price list and Finnish legislation. Time spent in the hospital was retrieved from hospital statistics. Time spent in the health care centre and travelling were estimated and monetized based on average salary. The cost of participating physicians attending a US training course was estimated based on the national average salary of a general practitioner as well as the course participation fee. A cost-minimization modeling was performed for this standardized patient comparing the total costs, including private and public costs, of standard and LCUS strategies. RESULTS: The total costs per patient of standard and LCUS pathways were 1151.52€ and 301.94€ [difference 849.59€ (95% CI 800.21€–898.97€, p < 0.001)], respectively. The real-life costs of these strategies, considering that some patients are probably referred to hospital every year and including training costs, are 1151.53€ and 508.69€ [difference 642.84€ (95% CI 541.85€–743.82€)], respectively. CONCLUSION: Using LCUS in diagnosing DVT in primary health care instead of referring these patients to the hospital is shown to save a significant amount of public and private resources. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13089-021-00227-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8160047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81600472021-06-17 Cost-minimization modeling of venous thromboembolism diagnostics: performing limited compression ultrasound in primary health care reduces costs compared to referring patients to a hospital Hannula, Ossi Mustonen, Anssi Rautiainen, Suvi Vanninen, Ritva Hyppölä, Harri Ultrasound J Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether diagnosing a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in primary health care using limited compression ultrasound (LCUS) can save resources compared to referring these patients to hospital. According to the current literature, LCUS is as safe as a standard protocol based on a whole-leg ultrasound (US). METHODS: We created a standardized patient for this cost-analysis model based on 76 patients that were referred to hospital for a suspected DVT. Travel distance to the health care centre and hospital was calculated based on the home address. Hospital costs were acquired from the hospital price list and Finnish legislation. Time spent in the hospital was retrieved from hospital statistics. Time spent in the health care centre and travelling were estimated and monetized based on average salary. The cost of participating physicians attending a US training course was estimated based on the national average salary of a general practitioner as well as the course participation fee. A cost-minimization modeling was performed for this standardized patient comparing the total costs, including private and public costs, of standard and LCUS strategies. RESULTS: The total costs per patient of standard and LCUS pathways were 1151.52€ and 301.94€ [difference 849.59€ (95% CI 800.21€–898.97€, p < 0.001)], respectively. The real-life costs of these strategies, considering that some patients are probably referred to hospital every year and including training costs, are 1151.53€ and 508.69€ [difference 642.84€ (95% CI 541.85€–743.82€)], respectively. CONCLUSION: Using LCUS in diagnosing DVT in primary health care instead of referring these patients to the hospital is shown to save a significant amount of public and private resources. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13089-021-00227-5. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8160047/ /pubmed/34046805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00227-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Hannula, Ossi
Mustonen, Anssi
Rautiainen, Suvi
Vanninen, Ritva
Hyppölä, Harri
Cost-minimization modeling of venous thromboembolism diagnostics: performing limited compression ultrasound in primary health care reduces costs compared to referring patients to a hospital
title Cost-minimization modeling of venous thromboembolism diagnostics: performing limited compression ultrasound in primary health care reduces costs compared to referring patients to a hospital
title_full Cost-minimization modeling of venous thromboembolism diagnostics: performing limited compression ultrasound in primary health care reduces costs compared to referring patients to a hospital
title_fullStr Cost-minimization modeling of venous thromboembolism diagnostics: performing limited compression ultrasound in primary health care reduces costs compared to referring patients to a hospital
title_full_unstemmed Cost-minimization modeling of venous thromboembolism diagnostics: performing limited compression ultrasound in primary health care reduces costs compared to referring patients to a hospital
title_short Cost-minimization modeling of venous thromboembolism diagnostics: performing limited compression ultrasound in primary health care reduces costs compared to referring patients to a hospital
title_sort cost-minimization modeling of venous thromboembolism diagnostics: performing limited compression ultrasound in primary health care reduces costs compared to referring patients to a hospital
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34046805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00227-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hannulaossi costminimizationmodelingofvenousthromboembolismdiagnosticsperforminglimitedcompressionultrasoundinprimaryhealthcarereducescostscomparedtoreferringpatientstoahospital
AT mustonenanssi costminimizationmodelingofvenousthromboembolismdiagnosticsperforminglimitedcompressionultrasoundinprimaryhealthcarereducescostscomparedtoreferringpatientstoahospital
AT rautiainensuvi costminimizationmodelingofvenousthromboembolismdiagnosticsperforminglimitedcompressionultrasoundinprimaryhealthcarereducescostscomparedtoreferringpatientstoahospital
AT vanninenritva costminimizationmodelingofvenousthromboembolismdiagnosticsperforminglimitedcompressionultrasoundinprimaryhealthcarereducescostscomparedtoreferringpatientstoahospital
AT hyppolaharri costminimizationmodelingofvenousthromboembolismdiagnosticsperforminglimitedcompressionultrasoundinprimaryhealthcarereducescostscomparedtoreferringpatientstoahospital