Cargando…

Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods

In this study, the minimal residual disease (MRD) levels in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) were assessed by comparing the new 8-color single-tube multiparameter flow cytometry method (DuraClone), which reduces the cost of antibodies and labor burden of laboratories, with the EuroFlow next-gener...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoroidaka, Takeshi, Narita, Kentaro, Takamatsu, Hiroyuki, Fujisawa, Momoko, Nakao, Shinji, Matsue, Kosei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34045494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89761-9
_version_ 1783700223726452736
author Yoroidaka, Takeshi
Narita, Kentaro
Takamatsu, Hiroyuki
Fujisawa, Momoko
Nakao, Shinji
Matsue, Kosei
author_facet Yoroidaka, Takeshi
Narita, Kentaro
Takamatsu, Hiroyuki
Fujisawa, Momoko
Nakao, Shinji
Matsue, Kosei
author_sort Yoroidaka, Takeshi
collection PubMed
description In this study, the minimal residual disease (MRD) levels in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) were assessed by comparing the new 8-color single-tube multiparameter flow cytometry method (DuraClone), which reduces the cost of antibodies and labor burden of laboratories, with the EuroFlow next-generation flow (NGF) method. A total of 96 samples derived from 69 patients with MM were assessed to determine the total cell acquisition number (tCAN), percentages of total and normal plasma cells (PCs), and MRD levels using two methods. We found that the tCAN was significantly higher with EuroFlow-NGF than with DuraClone (median 8.6 × 10(6) vs. 5.7 × 10(6); p < 0.0001). In addition, a significant correlation in the MRD levels between the two methods was noted (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001). However, in the qualitative analysis, 5.2% (5/96) of the samples showed discrepancies in the MRD levels. In conclusion, the DuraClone is a good option to evaluate MRD in multiple myeloma but it should be used with caution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8160149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81601492021-05-28 Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods Yoroidaka, Takeshi Narita, Kentaro Takamatsu, Hiroyuki Fujisawa, Momoko Nakao, Shinji Matsue, Kosei Sci Rep Article In this study, the minimal residual disease (MRD) levels in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) were assessed by comparing the new 8-color single-tube multiparameter flow cytometry method (DuraClone), which reduces the cost of antibodies and labor burden of laboratories, with the EuroFlow next-generation flow (NGF) method. A total of 96 samples derived from 69 patients with MM were assessed to determine the total cell acquisition number (tCAN), percentages of total and normal plasma cells (PCs), and MRD levels using two methods. We found that the tCAN was significantly higher with EuroFlow-NGF than with DuraClone (median 8.6 × 10(6) vs. 5.7 × 10(6); p < 0.0001). In addition, a significant correlation in the MRD levels between the two methods was noted (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001). However, in the qualitative analysis, 5.2% (5/96) of the samples showed discrepancies in the MRD levels. In conclusion, the DuraClone is a good option to evaluate MRD in multiple myeloma but it should be used with caution. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8160149/ /pubmed/34045494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89761-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Yoroidaka, Takeshi
Narita, Kentaro
Takamatsu, Hiroyuki
Fujisawa, Momoko
Nakao, Shinji
Matsue, Kosei
Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods
title Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods
title_full Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods
title_fullStr Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods
title_short Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods
title_sort comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the duraclone and euroflow methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34045494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89761-9
work_keys_str_mv AT yoroidakatakeshi comparisonofminimalresidualdiseasedetectioninmultiplemyelomabetweentheduracloneandeuroflowmethods
AT naritakentaro comparisonofminimalresidualdiseasedetectioninmultiplemyelomabetweentheduracloneandeuroflowmethods
AT takamatsuhiroyuki comparisonofminimalresidualdiseasedetectioninmultiplemyelomabetweentheduracloneandeuroflowmethods
AT fujisawamomoko comparisonofminimalresidualdiseasedetectioninmultiplemyelomabetweentheduracloneandeuroflowmethods
AT nakaoshinji comparisonofminimalresidualdiseasedetectioninmultiplemyelomabetweentheduracloneandeuroflowmethods
AT matsuekosei comparisonofminimalresidualdiseasedetectioninmultiplemyelomabetweentheduracloneandeuroflowmethods