Cargando…
Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods
In this study, the minimal residual disease (MRD) levels in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) were assessed by comparing the new 8-color single-tube multiparameter flow cytometry method (DuraClone), which reduces the cost of antibodies and labor burden of laboratories, with the EuroFlow next-gener...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34045494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89761-9 |
_version_ | 1783700223726452736 |
---|---|
author | Yoroidaka, Takeshi Narita, Kentaro Takamatsu, Hiroyuki Fujisawa, Momoko Nakao, Shinji Matsue, Kosei |
author_facet | Yoroidaka, Takeshi Narita, Kentaro Takamatsu, Hiroyuki Fujisawa, Momoko Nakao, Shinji Matsue, Kosei |
author_sort | Yoroidaka, Takeshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, the minimal residual disease (MRD) levels in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) were assessed by comparing the new 8-color single-tube multiparameter flow cytometry method (DuraClone), which reduces the cost of antibodies and labor burden of laboratories, with the EuroFlow next-generation flow (NGF) method. A total of 96 samples derived from 69 patients with MM were assessed to determine the total cell acquisition number (tCAN), percentages of total and normal plasma cells (PCs), and MRD levels using two methods. We found that the tCAN was significantly higher with EuroFlow-NGF than with DuraClone (median 8.6 × 10(6) vs. 5.7 × 10(6); p < 0.0001). In addition, a significant correlation in the MRD levels between the two methods was noted (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001). However, in the qualitative analysis, 5.2% (5/96) of the samples showed discrepancies in the MRD levels. In conclusion, the DuraClone is a good option to evaluate MRD in multiple myeloma but it should be used with caution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8160149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81601492021-05-28 Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods Yoroidaka, Takeshi Narita, Kentaro Takamatsu, Hiroyuki Fujisawa, Momoko Nakao, Shinji Matsue, Kosei Sci Rep Article In this study, the minimal residual disease (MRD) levels in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) were assessed by comparing the new 8-color single-tube multiparameter flow cytometry method (DuraClone), which reduces the cost of antibodies and labor burden of laboratories, with the EuroFlow next-generation flow (NGF) method. A total of 96 samples derived from 69 patients with MM were assessed to determine the total cell acquisition number (tCAN), percentages of total and normal plasma cells (PCs), and MRD levels using two methods. We found that the tCAN was significantly higher with EuroFlow-NGF than with DuraClone (median 8.6 × 10(6) vs. 5.7 × 10(6); p < 0.0001). In addition, a significant correlation in the MRD levels between the two methods was noted (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001). However, in the qualitative analysis, 5.2% (5/96) of the samples showed discrepancies in the MRD levels. In conclusion, the DuraClone is a good option to evaluate MRD in multiple myeloma but it should be used with caution. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8160149/ /pubmed/34045494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89761-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Yoroidaka, Takeshi Narita, Kentaro Takamatsu, Hiroyuki Fujisawa, Momoko Nakao, Shinji Matsue, Kosei Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods |
title | Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods |
title_full | Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods |
title_fullStr | Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods |
title_short | Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods |
title_sort | comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the duraclone and euroflow methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34045494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89761-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoroidakatakeshi comparisonofminimalresidualdiseasedetectioninmultiplemyelomabetweentheduracloneandeuroflowmethods AT naritakentaro comparisonofminimalresidualdiseasedetectioninmultiplemyelomabetweentheduracloneandeuroflowmethods AT takamatsuhiroyuki comparisonofminimalresidualdiseasedetectioninmultiplemyelomabetweentheduracloneandeuroflowmethods AT fujisawamomoko comparisonofminimalresidualdiseasedetectioninmultiplemyelomabetweentheduracloneandeuroflowmethods AT nakaoshinji comparisonofminimalresidualdiseasedetectioninmultiplemyelomabetweentheduracloneandeuroflowmethods AT matsuekosei comparisonofminimalresidualdiseasedetectioninmultiplemyelomabetweentheduracloneandeuroflowmethods |