Cargando…

Evaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients

BACKGROUND: The EuroQol EQ-5D is one of the most widely researched and applied patient-reported outcome measures worldwide. The original EQ-5D-3L and more recent EQ-5D-5L include three and five response categories respectively. Evidence from healthy and sick populations shows that the additional two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garratt, A. M., Furunes, H., Hellum, C., Solberg, T., Brox, J. I., Storheim, K., Johnsen, L. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34049574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01792-y
_version_ 1783700277049688064
author Garratt, A. M.
Furunes, H.
Hellum, C.
Solberg, T.
Brox, J. I.
Storheim, K.
Johnsen, L. G.
author_facet Garratt, A. M.
Furunes, H.
Hellum, C.
Solberg, T.
Brox, J. I.
Storheim, K.
Johnsen, L. G.
author_sort Garratt, A. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The EuroQol EQ-5D is one of the most widely researched and applied patient-reported outcome measures worldwide. The original EQ-5D-3L and more recent EQ-5D-5L include three and five response categories respectively. Evidence from healthy and sick populations shows that the additional two response categories improve measurement properties but there has not been a concurrent comparison of the two versions in patients with low back pain (LBP). METHODS: LBP patients taking part in a multicenter randomized controlled trial of lumbar total disc replacement and conservative treatment completed the EQ-5D-3L and 5L in an eight-year follow-up questionnaire. The 3L and 5L were assessed for aspects of data quality including missing data, floor and ceiling effects, response consistency, and based on a priori hypotheses, associations with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain-Visual Analogue Scales and Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25). RESULTS: At the eight-year follow-up, 151 (87%) patients were available and 146 completed both the 3L and 5L. Levels of missing data were the same for the two versions. Compared to the EQ-5D-5L, the 3L had significantly higher floor (pain discomfort) and ceiling effects (mobility, self-care, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). For these patients the EQ-5D-5L described 73 health states compared to 28 for the 3L. Shannon’s indices showed the 5L outperformed the 3L in tests of classification efficiency. Correlations with the ODI, Pain-VAS and HSCL-25 were largely as hypothesized, the 5L having slightly higher correlations than the 3L. CONCLUSION: The EQ-5D assesses important aspect of health in LBP patients and the 5L improves upon the 3L in this respect. The EQ-5D-5L is recommended in preference to the 3L version, however, further testing in other back pain populations together with additional measurement properties, including responsiveness to change, is recommended. Trial registration: retrospectively registered: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01704677.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8160396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81603962021-05-28 Evaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients Garratt, A. M. Furunes, H. Hellum, C. Solberg, T. Brox, J. I. Storheim, K. Johnsen, L. G. Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The EuroQol EQ-5D is one of the most widely researched and applied patient-reported outcome measures worldwide. The original EQ-5D-3L and more recent EQ-5D-5L include three and five response categories respectively. Evidence from healthy and sick populations shows that the additional two response categories improve measurement properties but there has not been a concurrent comparison of the two versions in patients with low back pain (LBP). METHODS: LBP patients taking part in a multicenter randomized controlled trial of lumbar total disc replacement and conservative treatment completed the EQ-5D-3L and 5L in an eight-year follow-up questionnaire. The 3L and 5L were assessed for aspects of data quality including missing data, floor and ceiling effects, response consistency, and based on a priori hypotheses, associations with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain-Visual Analogue Scales and Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25). RESULTS: At the eight-year follow-up, 151 (87%) patients were available and 146 completed both the 3L and 5L. Levels of missing data were the same for the two versions. Compared to the EQ-5D-5L, the 3L had significantly higher floor (pain discomfort) and ceiling effects (mobility, self-care, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). For these patients the EQ-5D-5L described 73 health states compared to 28 for the 3L. Shannon’s indices showed the 5L outperformed the 3L in tests of classification efficiency. Correlations with the ODI, Pain-VAS and HSCL-25 were largely as hypothesized, the 5L having slightly higher correlations than the 3L. CONCLUSION: The EQ-5D assesses important aspect of health in LBP patients and the 5L improves upon the 3L in this respect. The EQ-5D-5L is recommended in preference to the 3L version, however, further testing in other back pain populations together with additional measurement properties, including responsiveness to change, is recommended. Trial registration: retrospectively registered: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01704677. BioMed Central 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8160396/ /pubmed/34049574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01792-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Garratt, A. M.
Furunes, H.
Hellum, C.
Solberg, T.
Brox, J. I.
Storheim, K.
Johnsen, L. G.
Evaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients
title Evaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients
title_full Evaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients
title_fullStr Evaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients
title_short Evaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients
title_sort evaluation of the eq-5d-3l and 5l versions in low back pain patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34049574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01792-y
work_keys_str_mv AT garrattam evaluationoftheeq5d3land5lversionsinlowbackpainpatients
AT furunesh evaluationoftheeq5d3land5lversionsinlowbackpainpatients
AT hellumc evaluationoftheeq5d3land5lversionsinlowbackpainpatients
AT solbergt evaluationoftheeq5d3land5lversionsinlowbackpainpatients
AT broxji evaluationoftheeq5d3land5lversionsinlowbackpainpatients
AT storheimk evaluationoftheeq5d3land5lversionsinlowbackpainpatients
AT johnsenlg evaluationoftheeq5d3land5lversionsinlowbackpainpatients