Cargando…

Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China

Objective: To compare the hearing screening results of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and one-step automatic auditory brainstem response (AABR) in non-risk newborns, and to explore a more suitable hearing screening protocol for infants discharged within 48 h after birth in r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheng, Haibin, Zhou, Qian, Wang, Qixuan, Yu, Yun, Liu, Lihua, Liang, Meie, Zhou, Xueyan, Wu, Hao, Tang, Xiangrong, Huang, Zhiwu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34055691
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.655625
_version_ 1783700286070587392
author Sheng, Haibin
Zhou, Qian
Wang, Qixuan
Yu, Yun
Liu, Lihua
Liang, Meie
Zhou, Xueyan
Wu, Hao
Tang, Xiangrong
Huang, Zhiwu
author_facet Sheng, Haibin
Zhou, Qian
Wang, Qixuan
Yu, Yun
Liu, Lihua
Liang, Meie
Zhou, Xueyan
Wu, Hao
Tang, Xiangrong
Huang, Zhiwu
author_sort Sheng, Haibin
collection PubMed
description Objective: To compare the hearing screening results of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and one-step automatic auditory brainstem response (AABR) in non-risk newborns, and to explore a more suitable hearing screening protocol for infants discharged within 48 h after birth in remote areas of China. Methods: To analyze the age effect on pass rate for hearing screening, 2005 newborns were divided into three groups according to screening time after birth: <24, 24–48, and 48–72 h. All subjects received TEOAE + AABR test as first hearing screen, and those who failed in any test were rescreened with TEOAE + AABR at 6 weeks after birth. The first screening results of AABR and TEOAE were compared among the three groups. The results of two-step TEOAE screening and one-step AABR screening were compared for newborns who were discharged within 48 h. The time spent on screening was recorded for TEOAE and AABR. Results: The pass rate of TEOAE and AABR increased significantly with the increase of first screening time (P < 0.05), and the false positive rate decreased significantly with the increase of first screening time (P < 0.05). The failure rate of first screening of AABR within 48 h was 7.31%, which was significantly lower than that of TEOAE (9.93%) (P < 0.05). The average time spent on AABR was 12.51 ± 6.36 min, which was significantly higher than that of TEOAE (4.05 ± 1.56 min, P < 0.05). The failure rate of TEOAE two-step screening was 1.59%, which was significantly lower than one-step AABR. Conclusions: Compared with TEOAE, AABR screening within 48 h after birth can reduce the failure rate and false positive rate of first screening. However, compared with TEOAE two-step screening, one-step AABR screening has higher referral rate for audiological diagnosis. In remote areas of China, especially in hospitals with high delivery rate, one-step AABR screening is not feasible, and two-step TEOAE screening protocol is still applicable to UNHS screening as more and more infants discharged within 48 h after birth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8160434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81604342021-05-29 Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China Sheng, Haibin Zhou, Qian Wang, Qixuan Yu, Yun Liu, Lihua Liang, Meie Zhou, Xueyan Wu, Hao Tang, Xiangrong Huang, Zhiwu Front Pediatr Pediatrics Objective: To compare the hearing screening results of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and one-step automatic auditory brainstem response (AABR) in non-risk newborns, and to explore a more suitable hearing screening protocol for infants discharged within 48 h after birth in remote areas of China. Methods: To analyze the age effect on pass rate for hearing screening, 2005 newborns were divided into three groups according to screening time after birth: <24, 24–48, and 48–72 h. All subjects received TEOAE + AABR test as first hearing screen, and those who failed in any test were rescreened with TEOAE + AABR at 6 weeks after birth. The first screening results of AABR and TEOAE were compared among the three groups. The results of two-step TEOAE screening and one-step AABR screening were compared for newborns who were discharged within 48 h. The time spent on screening was recorded for TEOAE and AABR. Results: The pass rate of TEOAE and AABR increased significantly with the increase of first screening time (P < 0.05), and the false positive rate decreased significantly with the increase of first screening time (P < 0.05). The failure rate of first screening of AABR within 48 h was 7.31%, which was significantly lower than that of TEOAE (9.93%) (P < 0.05). The average time spent on AABR was 12.51 ± 6.36 min, which was significantly higher than that of TEOAE (4.05 ± 1.56 min, P < 0.05). The failure rate of TEOAE two-step screening was 1.59%, which was significantly lower than one-step AABR. Conclusions: Compared with TEOAE, AABR screening within 48 h after birth can reduce the failure rate and false positive rate of first screening. However, compared with TEOAE two-step screening, one-step AABR screening has higher referral rate for audiological diagnosis. In remote areas of China, especially in hospitals with high delivery rate, one-step AABR screening is not feasible, and two-step TEOAE screening protocol is still applicable to UNHS screening as more and more infants discharged within 48 h after birth. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8160434/ /pubmed/34055691 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.655625 Text en Copyright © 2021 Sheng, Zhou, Wang, Yu, Liu, Liang, Zhou, Wu, Tang and Huang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Sheng, Haibin
Zhou, Qian
Wang, Qixuan
Yu, Yun
Liu, Lihua
Liang, Meie
Zhou, Xueyan
Wu, Hao
Tang, Xiangrong
Huang, Zhiwu
Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China
title Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China
title_full Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China
title_fullStr Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China
title_short Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China
title_sort comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and one-step automated auditory brainstem response for universal newborn hearing screening programs in remote areas of china
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34055691
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.655625
work_keys_str_mv AT shenghaibin comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina
AT zhouqian comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina
AT wangqixuan comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina
AT yuyun comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina
AT liulihua comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina
AT liangmeie comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina
AT zhouxueyan comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina
AT wuhao comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina
AT tangxiangrong comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina
AT huangzhiwu comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina