Cargando…
Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China
Objective: To compare the hearing screening results of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and one-step automatic auditory brainstem response (AABR) in non-risk newborns, and to explore a more suitable hearing screening protocol for infants discharged within 48 h after birth in r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34055691 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.655625 |
_version_ | 1783700286070587392 |
---|---|
author | Sheng, Haibin Zhou, Qian Wang, Qixuan Yu, Yun Liu, Lihua Liang, Meie Zhou, Xueyan Wu, Hao Tang, Xiangrong Huang, Zhiwu |
author_facet | Sheng, Haibin Zhou, Qian Wang, Qixuan Yu, Yun Liu, Lihua Liang, Meie Zhou, Xueyan Wu, Hao Tang, Xiangrong Huang, Zhiwu |
author_sort | Sheng, Haibin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To compare the hearing screening results of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and one-step automatic auditory brainstem response (AABR) in non-risk newborns, and to explore a more suitable hearing screening protocol for infants discharged within 48 h after birth in remote areas of China. Methods: To analyze the age effect on pass rate for hearing screening, 2005 newborns were divided into three groups according to screening time after birth: <24, 24–48, and 48–72 h. All subjects received TEOAE + AABR test as first hearing screen, and those who failed in any test were rescreened with TEOAE + AABR at 6 weeks after birth. The first screening results of AABR and TEOAE were compared among the three groups. The results of two-step TEOAE screening and one-step AABR screening were compared for newborns who were discharged within 48 h. The time spent on screening was recorded for TEOAE and AABR. Results: The pass rate of TEOAE and AABR increased significantly with the increase of first screening time (P < 0.05), and the false positive rate decreased significantly with the increase of first screening time (P < 0.05). The failure rate of first screening of AABR within 48 h was 7.31%, which was significantly lower than that of TEOAE (9.93%) (P < 0.05). The average time spent on AABR was 12.51 ± 6.36 min, which was significantly higher than that of TEOAE (4.05 ± 1.56 min, P < 0.05). The failure rate of TEOAE two-step screening was 1.59%, which was significantly lower than one-step AABR. Conclusions: Compared with TEOAE, AABR screening within 48 h after birth can reduce the failure rate and false positive rate of first screening. However, compared with TEOAE two-step screening, one-step AABR screening has higher referral rate for audiological diagnosis. In remote areas of China, especially in hospitals with high delivery rate, one-step AABR screening is not feasible, and two-step TEOAE screening protocol is still applicable to UNHS screening as more and more infants discharged within 48 h after birth. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8160434 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81604342021-05-29 Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China Sheng, Haibin Zhou, Qian Wang, Qixuan Yu, Yun Liu, Lihua Liang, Meie Zhou, Xueyan Wu, Hao Tang, Xiangrong Huang, Zhiwu Front Pediatr Pediatrics Objective: To compare the hearing screening results of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and one-step automatic auditory brainstem response (AABR) in non-risk newborns, and to explore a more suitable hearing screening protocol for infants discharged within 48 h after birth in remote areas of China. Methods: To analyze the age effect on pass rate for hearing screening, 2005 newborns were divided into three groups according to screening time after birth: <24, 24–48, and 48–72 h. All subjects received TEOAE + AABR test as first hearing screen, and those who failed in any test were rescreened with TEOAE + AABR at 6 weeks after birth. The first screening results of AABR and TEOAE were compared among the three groups. The results of two-step TEOAE screening and one-step AABR screening were compared for newborns who were discharged within 48 h. The time spent on screening was recorded for TEOAE and AABR. Results: The pass rate of TEOAE and AABR increased significantly with the increase of first screening time (P < 0.05), and the false positive rate decreased significantly with the increase of first screening time (P < 0.05). The failure rate of first screening of AABR within 48 h was 7.31%, which was significantly lower than that of TEOAE (9.93%) (P < 0.05). The average time spent on AABR was 12.51 ± 6.36 min, which was significantly higher than that of TEOAE (4.05 ± 1.56 min, P < 0.05). The failure rate of TEOAE two-step screening was 1.59%, which was significantly lower than one-step AABR. Conclusions: Compared with TEOAE, AABR screening within 48 h after birth can reduce the failure rate and false positive rate of first screening. However, compared with TEOAE two-step screening, one-step AABR screening has higher referral rate for audiological diagnosis. In remote areas of China, especially in hospitals with high delivery rate, one-step AABR screening is not feasible, and two-step TEOAE screening protocol is still applicable to UNHS screening as more and more infants discharged within 48 h after birth. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8160434/ /pubmed/34055691 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.655625 Text en Copyright © 2021 Sheng, Zhou, Wang, Yu, Liu, Liang, Zhou, Wu, Tang and Huang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pediatrics Sheng, Haibin Zhou, Qian Wang, Qixuan Yu, Yun Liu, Lihua Liang, Meie Zhou, Xueyan Wu, Hao Tang, Xiangrong Huang, Zhiwu Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China |
title | Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China |
title_full | Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China |
title_short | Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China |
title_sort | comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and one-step automated auditory brainstem response for universal newborn hearing screening programs in remote areas of china |
topic | Pediatrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34055691 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.655625 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shenghaibin comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina AT zhouqian comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina AT wangqixuan comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina AT yuyun comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina AT liulihua comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina AT liangmeie comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina AT zhouxueyan comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina AT wuhao comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina AT tangxiangrong comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina AT huangzhiwu comparisonoftwosteptransientevokedotoacousticemissionsandonestepautomatedauditorybrainstemresponseforuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningprogramsinremoteareasofchina |