Cargando…

Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE: Outpatient postpartum recovery is an underexplored area of obstetrics. There is currently no consensus regarding which patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) clinicians and researchers should use to evaluate postpartum recovery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate PROMs of outpatient postpartum reco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sultan, Pervez, Sharawi, Nadir, Blake, Lindsay, Ando, Kazuo, Sultan, Ellile, Aghaeepour, Nima, Carvalho, Brendan, Sadana, Nishant
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34042993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11600
_version_ 1783700313955368960
author Sultan, Pervez
Sharawi, Nadir
Blake, Lindsay
Ando, Kazuo
Sultan, Ellile
Aghaeepour, Nima
Carvalho, Brendan
Sadana, Nishant
author_facet Sultan, Pervez
Sharawi, Nadir
Blake, Lindsay
Ando, Kazuo
Sultan, Ellile
Aghaeepour, Nima
Carvalho, Brendan
Sadana, Nishant
author_sort Sultan, Pervez
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Outpatient postpartum recovery is an underexplored area of obstetrics. There is currently no consensus regarding which patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) clinicians and researchers should use to evaluate postpartum recovery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate PROMs of outpatient postpartum recovery using Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. EVIDENCE REVIEW: An initial literature search performed in July 2019 identified postpartum recovery PROMs and validation studies. A secondary search in July 2020 identified additional validation studies. Both searches were performed using 4 databases (Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and CINAHL), with no date limiters. Studies with PROMs evaluating more than 3 proposed outpatient postpartum recovery domains were considered. Studies were included if they assessed any psychometric measurement property of the included PROMs in the outpatient postpartum setting. The PROMs were assessed for the following 8 psychometric measurement properties, as defined by COSMIN: content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity and measurement invariance, reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness. Psychometric measurement properties were evaluated in each included study using the COSMIN criteria by assessing (1) the quality of the methods (very good, adequate, doubtful, inadequate, or not assessed); (2) overall rating of results (sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, or indeterminate); (3) level of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations assessment tool; and (4) level of recommendation, which included class A (recommended for use; showed adequate content validity with at least low-quality evidence for sufficient internal consistency), class B (not class A or class C), or class C (not recommended). FINDINGS: In total, 15 PROMs (7 obstetric specific and 8 non–obstetric specific) were identified, evaluating outpatient postpartum recovery in 46 studies involving 19 165 women. The majority of psychometric measurement properties of the included PROMs were graded as having very-low-level or low-level evidence. The best-performing PROMs that received class A recommendations were the Maternal Concerns Questionnaire, the Postpartum Quality of Life tool, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life–BREF. The remainder of the evaluated PROMs had insufficient evidence to make recommendations regarding their use (and received class B recommendations). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This review found that the best-performing PROMs currently available to evaluate outpatient postpartum recovery were the Maternal Concerns Questionnaire, the Postpartum Quality of Life tool, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life–BREF; however, these tools all had significant limitations. This study highlights the need to focus future efforts on robustly developing and validating a new PROM that may comprehensively evaluate outpatient postpartum recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8160591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81605912021-06-17 Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review Sultan, Pervez Sharawi, Nadir Blake, Lindsay Ando, Kazuo Sultan, Ellile Aghaeepour, Nima Carvalho, Brendan Sadana, Nishant JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Outpatient postpartum recovery is an underexplored area of obstetrics. There is currently no consensus regarding which patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) clinicians and researchers should use to evaluate postpartum recovery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate PROMs of outpatient postpartum recovery using Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. EVIDENCE REVIEW: An initial literature search performed in July 2019 identified postpartum recovery PROMs and validation studies. A secondary search in July 2020 identified additional validation studies. Both searches were performed using 4 databases (Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and CINAHL), with no date limiters. Studies with PROMs evaluating more than 3 proposed outpatient postpartum recovery domains were considered. Studies were included if they assessed any psychometric measurement property of the included PROMs in the outpatient postpartum setting. The PROMs were assessed for the following 8 psychometric measurement properties, as defined by COSMIN: content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity and measurement invariance, reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness. Psychometric measurement properties were evaluated in each included study using the COSMIN criteria by assessing (1) the quality of the methods (very good, adequate, doubtful, inadequate, or not assessed); (2) overall rating of results (sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, or indeterminate); (3) level of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations assessment tool; and (4) level of recommendation, which included class A (recommended for use; showed adequate content validity with at least low-quality evidence for sufficient internal consistency), class B (not class A or class C), or class C (not recommended). FINDINGS: In total, 15 PROMs (7 obstetric specific and 8 non–obstetric specific) were identified, evaluating outpatient postpartum recovery in 46 studies involving 19 165 women. The majority of psychometric measurement properties of the included PROMs were graded as having very-low-level or low-level evidence. The best-performing PROMs that received class A recommendations were the Maternal Concerns Questionnaire, the Postpartum Quality of Life tool, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life–BREF. The remainder of the evaluated PROMs had insufficient evidence to make recommendations regarding their use (and received class B recommendations). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This review found that the best-performing PROMs currently available to evaluate outpatient postpartum recovery were the Maternal Concerns Questionnaire, the Postpartum Quality of Life tool, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life–BREF; however, these tools all had significant limitations. This study highlights the need to focus future efforts on robustly developing and validating a new PROM that may comprehensively evaluate outpatient postpartum recovery. American Medical Association 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8160591/ /pubmed/34042993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11600 Text en Copyright 2021 Sultan P et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Sultan, Pervez
Sharawi, Nadir
Blake, Lindsay
Ando, Kazuo
Sultan, Ellile
Aghaeepour, Nima
Carvalho, Brendan
Sadana, Nishant
Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review
title Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review
title_full Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review
title_short Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review
title_sort use of patient-reported outcome measures to assess outpatient postpartum recovery: a systematic review
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34042993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11600
work_keys_str_mv AT sultanpervez useofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurestoassessoutpatientpostpartumrecoveryasystematicreview
AT sharawinadir useofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurestoassessoutpatientpostpartumrecoveryasystematicreview
AT blakelindsay useofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurestoassessoutpatientpostpartumrecoveryasystematicreview
AT andokazuo useofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurestoassessoutpatientpostpartumrecoveryasystematicreview
AT sultanellile useofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurestoassessoutpatientpostpartumrecoveryasystematicreview
AT aghaeepournima useofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurestoassessoutpatientpostpartumrecoveryasystematicreview
AT carvalhobrendan useofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurestoassessoutpatientpostpartumrecoveryasystematicreview
AT sadananishant useofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurestoassessoutpatientpostpartumrecoveryasystematicreview