Cargando…

Feasibility and Long-Term Efficacy of PEComa Treatment—20 Years of Experience

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) represent a family of rare mesenchymal neoplasms, some of which are malignant. There are no specific management guidelines for PEComas, and factors correlating with the disease course are not well defined. This analysis aimed to describe the outcomes of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sobiborowicz, Aleksandra, Świtaj, Tomasz, Teterycz, Paweł, Spałek, Mateusz J., Szumera-Ciećkiewicz, Anna, Wągrodzki, Michał, Zdzienicki, Marcin, Czarnecka, Anna M., Rutkowski, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069629
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102200
_version_ 1783700337897504768
author Sobiborowicz, Aleksandra
Świtaj, Tomasz
Teterycz, Paweł
Spałek, Mateusz J.
Szumera-Ciećkiewicz, Anna
Wągrodzki, Michał
Zdzienicki, Marcin
Czarnecka, Anna M.
Rutkowski, Piotr
author_facet Sobiborowicz, Aleksandra
Świtaj, Tomasz
Teterycz, Paweł
Spałek, Mateusz J.
Szumera-Ciećkiewicz, Anna
Wągrodzki, Michał
Zdzienicki, Marcin
Czarnecka, Anna M.
Rutkowski, Piotr
author_sort Sobiborowicz, Aleksandra
collection PubMed
description Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) represent a family of rare mesenchymal neoplasms, some of which are malignant. There are no specific management guidelines for PEComas, and factors correlating with the disease course are not well defined. This analysis aimed to describe the outcomes of PEComa patients treated radically, including those treated exclusively in the national reference sarcoma center. The secondary aim of the study was to analyze factors associated with PEComa treatment efficacy. We performed an analysis of 27 patients subsequently treated radically for PEComa between 1999 and 2019 who were in follow-up in the national sarcoma reference center. The proportional-hazards model was used to compare the risk of death. The median age at diagnosis was 45 (21–67) years, and 67% of patients were female. The median follow-up period was 68 months (95% CI: 39–101). At the time of analysis, eleven patients (40.7%) experienced progression of the disease and four (14.8%) died. Surgery in the reference sarcoma center was associated with a longer disease control (log-rank p < 0.001). The 5-year-OS rate was 88% (95% CI: 74–100) for the whole analyzed group. We concluded that PEComa treatment should be managed in reference sarcoma centers by a multidisciplinary tumor board with an experienced surgical team. Microscopically radical resection is associated with a longer disease-free survival. Patients requiring long-term follow-ups as late recurrence may be expected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8160690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81606902021-05-29 Feasibility and Long-Term Efficacy of PEComa Treatment—20 Years of Experience Sobiborowicz, Aleksandra Świtaj, Tomasz Teterycz, Paweł Spałek, Mateusz J. Szumera-Ciećkiewicz, Anna Wągrodzki, Michał Zdzienicki, Marcin Czarnecka, Anna M. Rutkowski, Piotr J Clin Med Article Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) represent a family of rare mesenchymal neoplasms, some of which are malignant. There are no specific management guidelines for PEComas, and factors correlating with the disease course are not well defined. This analysis aimed to describe the outcomes of PEComa patients treated radically, including those treated exclusively in the national reference sarcoma center. The secondary aim of the study was to analyze factors associated with PEComa treatment efficacy. We performed an analysis of 27 patients subsequently treated radically for PEComa between 1999 and 2019 who were in follow-up in the national sarcoma reference center. The proportional-hazards model was used to compare the risk of death. The median age at diagnosis was 45 (21–67) years, and 67% of patients were female. The median follow-up period was 68 months (95% CI: 39–101). At the time of analysis, eleven patients (40.7%) experienced progression of the disease and four (14.8%) died. Surgery in the reference sarcoma center was associated with a longer disease control (log-rank p < 0.001). The 5-year-OS rate was 88% (95% CI: 74–100) for the whole analyzed group. We concluded that PEComa treatment should be managed in reference sarcoma centers by a multidisciplinary tumor board with an experienced surgical team. Microscopically radical resection is associated with a longer disease-free survival. Patients requiring long-term follow-ups as late recurrence may be expected. MDPI 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8160690/ /pubmed/34069629 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102200 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sobiborowicz, Aleksandra
Świtaj, Tomasz
Teterycz, Paweł
Spałek, Mateusz J.
Szumera-Ciećkiewicz, Anna
Wągrodzki, Michał
Zdzienicki, Marcin
Czarnecka, Anna M.
Rutkowski, Piotr
Feasibility and Long-Term Efficacy of PEComa Treatment—20 Years of Experience
title Feasibility and Long-Term Efficacy of PEComa Treatment—20 Years of Experience
title_full Feasibility and Long-Term Efficacy of PEComa Treatment—20 Years of Experience
title_fullStr Feasibility and Long-Term Efficacy of PEComa Treatment—20 Years of Experience
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and Long-Term Efficacy of PEComa Treatment—20 Years of Experience
title_short Feasibility and Long-Term Efficacy of PEComa Treatment—20 Years of Experience
title_sort feasibility and long-term efficacy of pecoma treatment—20 years of experience
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069629
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102200
work_keys_str_mv AT sobiborowiczaleksandra feasibilityandlongtermefficacyofpecomatreatment20yearsofexperience
AT switajtomasz feasibilityandlongtermefficacyofpecomatreatment20yearsofexperience
AT teteryczpaweł feasibilityandlongtermefficacyofpecomatreatment20yearsofexperience
AT spałekmateuszj feasibilityandlongtermefficacyofpecomatreatment20yearsofexperience
AT szumeracieckiewiczanna feasibilityandlongtermefficacyofpecomatreatment20yearsofexperience
AT wagrodzkimichał feasibilityandlongtermefficacyofpecomatreatment20yearsofexperience
AT zdzienickimarcin feasibilityandlongtermefficacyofpecomatreatment20yearsofexperience
AT czarneckaannam feasibilityandlongtermefficacyofpecomatreatment20yearsofexperience
AT rutkowskipiotr feasibilityandlongtermefficacyofpecomatreatment20yearsofexperience