Cargando…

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Interventional Clinical Trial Studies for Gene Therapies for the Inherited Retinal Degenerations (IRDs)

IRDs are one of the leading causes of visual loss in children and young adults. Mutations in over 271 genes lead to retinal dysfunction, degeneration and sight loss. Though no cure exists, gene augmentation therapy has brought hope to the field. This systematic review sought to assess the efficacy o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuohy, Gearóid P., Megaw, Roly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069580
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom11050760
_version_ 1783700342152626176
author Tuohy, Gearóid P.
Megaw, Roly
author_facet Tuohy, Gearóid P.
Megaw, Roly
author_sort Tuohy, Gearóid P.
collection PubMed
description IRDs are one of the leading causes of visual loss in children and young adults. Mutations in over 271 genes lead to retinal dysfunction, degeneration and sight loss. Though no cure exists, gene augmentation therapy has brought hope to the field. This systematic review sought to assess the efficacy of available gene therapy treatments for IRDs. Databases and public resources were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs). Standard methodological procedures were used, including a risk-of-bias assessment. One RCT and five NRSIs were assessed, all for adeno-associated virus two (AAV2)-mediated treatment of RPE-specific 65 kDa (RPE65)-associated LCA (Leber congenital amaurosis). Five outcomes were reported for meta-analyses. Modest improvements in visual acuity, ambulatory navigation/mobility testing or central retinal thickness was observed. There was significant improvement in red and blue light full-field stimulus testing (FST) (red light risk ratio of 1.89, treated v control, p = 0.04; and blue light risk ratio of 2.01, treated v control, p = 0.001). Study design assessment using a ROBIN-I tool (Cochrane Library) showed risk-of-bias judgement to be “low/moderate”, whilst there were “some concerns” for the RCT using a RoB-2 tool (Cochrane Library). Although comparison by meta-analysis is compromised by, amongst other issues, a variable amount of vector delivered in each trial, FST improvements demonstrate a proof-of-principle for treating IRDs with gene therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8160708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81607082021-05-29 A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Interventional Clinical Trial Studies for Gene Therapies for the Inherited Retinal Degenerations (IRDs) Tuohy, Gearóid P. Megaw, Roly Biomolecules Systematic Review IRDs are one of the leading causes of visual loss in children and young adults. Mutations in over 271 genes lead to retinal dysfunction, degeneration and sight loss. Though no cure exists, gene augmentation therapy has brought hope to the field. This systematic review sought to assess the efficacy of available gene therapy treatments for IRDs. Databases and public resources were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs). Standard methodological procedures were used, including a risk-of-bias assessment. One RCT and five NRSIs were assessed, all for adeno-associated virus two (AAV2)-mediated treatment of RPE-specific 65 kDa (RPE65)-associated LCA (Leber congenital amaurosis). Five outcomes were reported for meta-analyses. Modest improvements in visual acuity, ambulatory navigation/mobility testing or central retinal thickness was observed. There was significant improvement in red and blue light full-field stimulus testing (FST) (red light risk ratio of 1.89, treated v control, p = 0.04; and blue light risk ratio of 2.01, treated v control, p = 0.001). Study design assessment using a ROBIN-I tool (Cochrane Library) showed risk-of-bias judgement to be “low/moderate”, whilst there were “some concerns” for the RCT using a RoB-2 tool (Cochrane Library). Although comparison by meta-analysis is compromised by, amongst other issues, a variable amount of vector delivered in each trial, FST improvements demonstrate a proof-of-principle for treating IRDs with gene therapy. MDPI 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8160708/ /pubmed/34069580 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom11050760 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Tuohy, Gearóid P.
Megaw, Roly
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Interventional Clinical Trial Studies for Gene Therapies for the Inherited Retinal Degenerations (IRDs)
title A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Interventional Clinical Trial Studies for Gene Therapies for the Inherited Retinal Degenerations (IRDs)
title_full A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Interventional Clinical Trial Studies for Gene Therapies for the Inherited Retinal Degenerations (IRDs)
title_fullStr A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Interventional Clinical Trial Studies for Gene Therapies for the Inherited Retinal Degenerations (IRDs)
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Interventional Clinical Trial Studies for Gene Therapies for the Inherited Retinal Degenerations (IRDs)
title_short A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Interventional Clinical Trial Studies for Gene Therapies for the Inherited Retinal Degenerations (IRDs)
title_sort systematic review and meta-analyses of interventional clinical trial studies for gene therapies for the inherited retinal degenerations (irds)
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069580
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom11050760
work_keys_str_mv AT tuohygearoidp asystematicreviewandmetaanalysesofinterventionalclinicaltrialstudiesforgenetherapiesfortheinheritedretinaldegenerationsirds
AT megawroly asystematicreviewandmetaanalysesofinterventionalclinicaltrialstudiesforgenetherapiesfortheinheritedretinaldegenerationsirds
AT tuohygearoidp systematicreviewandmetaanalysesofinterventionalclinicaltrialstudiesforgenetherapiesfortheinheritedretinaldegenerationsirds
AT megawroly systematicreviewandmetaanalysesofinterventionalclinicaltrialstudiesforgenetherapiesfortheinheritedretinaldegenerationsirds