Cargando…
Evaluation of the Ginsburg Scheme: Where Is Significant Prostate Cancer Missed?
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Systematic biopsy according to the Ginsburg scheme is widely used to complement MRI-targeted biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. This is the first study to evaluate the distribution of cancerous lesions that were missed by the Ginsburg scheme. We found that significant prost...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34065418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13102502 |
_version_ | 1783700350585274368 |
---|---|
author | Sigle, August Jilg, Cordula A. Kuru, Timur H. Binder, Nadine Michaelis, Jakob Grabbert, Markus Schultze-Seemann, Wolfgang Miernik, Arkadiusz Gratzke, Christian Benndorf, Matthias Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo |
author_facet | Sigle, August Jilg, Cordula A. Kuru, Timur H. Binder, Nadine Michaelis, Jakob Grabbert, Markus Schultze-Seemann, Wolfgang Miernik, Arkadiusz Gratzke, Christian Benndorf, Matthias Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo |
author_sort | Sigle, August |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Systematic biopsy according to the Ginsburg scheme is widely used to complement MRI-targeted biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. This is the first study to evaluate the distribution of cancerous lesions that were missed by the Ginsburg scheme. We found that significant prostate cancer lesions were missed in 3.6% of patients. The majority of the missed lesions (17/39, 43.6%) were localized within the anterior region of the prostate. Complementing the Ginsburg scheme by adding biopsy cores to this region may be considered in certain patients who were extensively pre-biopsied without a conclusive diagnosis or when targeted biopsy was not possible. Moreover, based on Ginsburg scheme sectors and newly defined blind sectors, we developed a new sector map of the prostate that can be applied to focal therapy planning and for the follow-up management of patients under active surveillance. ABSTRACT: Background: Systematic biopsy (SB) according to the Ginsburg scheme (GBS) is widely used to complement MRI-targeted biopsy (MR-TB) for optimizing the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (sPCa). Knowledge of the GBS’s blind sectors where sPCa is missed is crucial to improve biopsy strategies. Methods: We analyzed cancer detection rates in 1084 patients that underwent MR-TB and SB. Cancerous lesions that were missed or underestimated by GBS were re-localized onto a prostate map encompassing Ginsburg sectors and blind-sectors (anterior, central, basodorsal and basoventral). Logistic regression analysis (LRA) and prostatic configuration analysis were applied to identify predictors for missing sPCa with the GBS. Results: GBS missed sPCa in 39 patients (39/1084, 3.6%). In 27 cases (27/39, 69.2%), sPCa was missed within a blind sector, with 17/39 lesions localized in the anterior region (43.6%). Neither LRA nor prostatic configuration analysis identified predictors for missing sPCa with the GBS. Conclusions: This is the first study to analyze the distribution of sPCa missed by the GBS. GBS misses sPCa in few men only, with the majority localized in the anterior region. Adding blind sectors to GBS defined a new sector map of the prostate suited for reporting histopathological biopsy results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8160743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81607432021-05-29 Evaluation of the Ginsburg Scheme: Where Is Significant Prostate Cancer Missed? Sigle, August Jilg, Cordula A. Kuru, Timur H. Binder, Nadine Michaelis, Jakob Grabbert, Markus Schultze-Seemann, Wolfgang Miernik, Arkadiusz Gratzke, Christian Benndorf, Matthias Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Systematic biopsy according to the Ginsburg scheme is widely used to complement MRI-targeted biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. This is the first study to evaluate the distribution of cancerous lesions that were missed by the Ginsburg scheme. We found that significant prostate cancer lesions were missed in 3.6% of patients. The majority of the missed lesions (17/39, 43.6%) were localized within the anterior region of the prostate. Complementing the Ginsburg scheme by adding biopsy cores to this region may be considered in certain patients who were extensively pre-biopsied without a conclusive diagnosis or when targeted biopsy was not possible. Moreover, based on Ginsburg scheme sectors and newly defined blind sectors, we developed a new sector map of the prostate that can be applied to focal therapy planning and for the follow-up management of patients under active surveillance. ABSTRACT: Background: Systematic biopsy (SB) according to the Ginsburg scheme (GBS) is widely used to complement MRI-targeted biopsy (MR-TB) for optimizing the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (sPCa). Knowledge of the GBS’s blind sectors where sPCa is missed is crucial to improve biopsy strategies. Methods: We analyzed cancer detection rates in 1084 patients that underwent MR-TB and SB. Cancerous lesions that were missed or underestimated by GBS were re-localized onto a prostate map encompassing Ginsburg sectors and blind-sectors (anterior, central, basodorsal and basoventral). Logistic regression analysis (LRA) and prostatic configuration analysis were applied to identify predictors for missing sPCa with the GBS. Results: GBS missed sPCa in 39 patients (39/1084, 3.6%). In 27 cases (27/39, 69.2%), sPCa was missed within a blind sector, with 17/39 lesions localized in the anterior region (43.6%). Neither LRA nor prostatic configuration analysis identified predictors for missing sPCa with the GBS. Conclusions: This is the first study to analyze the distribution of sPCa missed by the GBS. GBS misses sPCa in few men only, with the majority localized in the anterior region. Adding blind sectors to GBS defined a new sector map of the prostate suited for reporting histopathological biopsy results. MDPI 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8160743/ /pubmed/34065418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13102502 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sigle, August Jilg, Cordula A. Kuru, Timur H. Binder, Nadine Michaelis, Jakob Grabbert, Markus Schultze-Seemann, Wolfgang Miernik, Arkadiusz Gratzke, Christian Benndorf, Matthias Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo Evaluation of the Ginsburg Scheme: Where Is Significant Prostate Cancer Missed? |
title | Evaluation of the Ginsburg Scheme: Where Is Significant Prostate Cancer Missed? |
title_full | Evaluation of the Ginsburg Scheme: Where Is Significant Prostate Cancer Missed? |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Ginsburg Scheme: Where Is Significant Prostate Cancer Missed? |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Ginsburg Scheme: Where Is Significant Prostate Cancer Missed? |
title_short | Evaluation of the Ginsburg Scheme: Where Is Significant Prostate Cancer Missed? |
title_sort | evaluation of the ginsburg scheme: where is significant prostate cancer missed? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34065418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13102502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sigleaugust evaluationoftheginsburgschemewhereissignificantprostatecancermissed AT jilgcordulaa evaluationoftheginsburgschemewhereissignificantprostatecancermissed AT kurutimurh evaluationoftheginsburgschemewhereissignificantprostatecancermissed AT bindernadine evaluationoftheginsburgschemewhereissignificantprostatecancermissed AT michaelisjakob evaluationoftheginsburgschemewhereissignificantprostatecancermissed AT grabbertmarkus evaluationoftheginsburgschemewhereissignificantprostatecancermissed AT schultzeseemannwolfgang evaluationoftheginsburgschemewhereissignificantprostatecancermissed AT miernikarkadiusz evaluationoftheginsburgschemewhereissignificantprostatecancermissed AT gratzkechristian evaluationoftheginsburgschemewhereissignificantprostatecancermissed AT benndorfmatthias evaluationoftheginsburgschemewhereissignificantprostatecancermissed AT suarezibarrolarodrigo evaluationoftheginsburgschemewhereissignificantprostatecancermissed |