Cargando…

Prevalence of Orthorexia Nervosa and Its Diagnostic Tools—A Literature Review

The aim of this article is to present the up-to-date diagnostic tools of orthorexia and markers of its prevalence on the basis of the available literature. The authors searched PubMedCentral (PMC) and Google Scholar with the search entry of “orthorexia”, “orthorexia nervosa”, and “orthorexicbehaviou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niedzielski, Antoni, Kaźmierczak-Wojtaś, Natalia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34065506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105488
_version_ 1783700357878120448
author Niedzielski, Antoni
Kaźmierczak-Wojtaś, Natalia
author_facet Niedzielski, Antoni
Kaźmierczak-Wojtaś, Natalia
author_sort Niedzielski, Antoni
collection PubMed
description The aim of this article is to present the up-to-date diagnostic tools of orthorexia and markers of its prevalence on the basis of the available literature. The authors searched PubMedCentral (PMC) and Google Scholar with the search entry of “orthorexia”, “orthorexia nervosa”, and “orthorexicbehaviours”. We describe the tools of evaluation of orthorexicbehaviour (i.e., orthorexia self-test—BOT, the ORTO-15 questionnaire, Eating Habits Questionnaire—EHQ, Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale—DOS, Teruel Orthorexia Scale—TOS, Barcelona Orthorexia Scale—BOS, and Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory—ONI), and offer a review of the studies on orthorexia nervosa. We conclude that there are no reliable data regarding the prevalence of orthorexia nervosa. The available studies point to significant differences in the prevalence depending on the value of cut-off points and tools used. The prevalence varies across countries and across populations, ranging from 6.9% in the Italian population to 88.7% in the group of Brazilian students of dieting. Thus, it indicates that some groups seem to be susceptible to the risk of ON more than others. It is a challenge to determine the prevalence of orthorexia, and any obtained results should be treated with caution. Consequently, we claim that the use of the ORTO-15 questionnaire to diagnose orthorexia is questionable due to a high percentage of falsely positive results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8160773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81607732021-05-29 Prevalence of Orthorexia Nervosa and Its Diagnostic Tools—A Literature Review Niedzielski, Antoni Kaźmierczak-Wojtaś, Natalia Int J Environ Res Public Health Review The aim of this article is to present the up-to-date diagnostic tools of orthorexia and markers of its prevalence on the basis of the available literature. The authors searched PubMedCentral (PMC) and Google Scholar with the search entry of “orthorexia”, “orthorexia nervosa”, and “orthorexicbehaviours”. We describe the tools of evaluation of orthorexicbehaviour (i.e., orthorexia self-test—BOT, the ORTO-15 questionnaire, Eating Habits Questionnaire—EHQ, Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale—DOS, Teruel Orthorexia Scale—TOS, Barcelona Orthorexia Scale—BOS, and Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory—ONI), and offer a review of the studies on orthorexia nervosa. We conclude that there are no reliable data regarding the prevalence of orthorexia nervosa. The available studies point to significant differences in the prevalence depending on the value of cut-off points and tools used. The prevalence varies across countries and across populations, ranging from 6.9% in the Italian population to 88.7% in the group of Brazilian students of dieting. Thus, it indicates that some groups seem to be susceptible to the risk of ON more than others. It is a challenge to determine the prevalence of orthorexia, and any obtained results should be treated with caution. Consequently, we claim that the use of the ORTO-15 questionnaire to diagnose orthorexia is questionable due to a high percentage of falsely positive results. MDPI 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8160773/ /pubmed/34065506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105488 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Niedzielski, Antoni
Kaźmierczak-Wojtaś, Natalia
Prevalence of Orthorexia Nervosa and Its Diagnostic Tools—A Literature Review
title Prevalence of Orthorexia Nervosa and Its Diagnostic Tools—A Literature Review
title_full Prevalence of Orthorexia Nervosa and Its Diagnostic Tools—A Literature Review
title_fullStr Prevalence of Orthorexia Nervosa and Its Diagnostic Tools—A Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Orthorexia Nervosa and Its Diagnostic Tools—A Literature Review
title_short Prevalence of Orthorexia Nervosa and Its Diagnostic Tools—A Literature Review
title_sort prevalence of orthorexia nervosa and its diagnostic tools—a literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8160773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34065506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105488
work_keys_str_mv AT niedzielskiantoni prevalenceoforthorexianervosaanditsdiagnostictoolsaliteraturereview
AT kazmierczakwojtasnatalia prevalenceoforthorexianervosaanditsdiagnostictoolsaliteraturereview