Cargando…

Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples

The difficulty of cultivation of Legionella spp. from water samples remains a strenuous task even for experienced laboratories. The long incubation periods for Legionellae make isolation difficult. In addition, the water samples themselves are often contaminated with accompanying microbial flora, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toplitsch, Daniela, Platzer, Sabine, Zehner, Romana, Maitz, Stephanie, Mascher, Franz, Kittinger, Clemens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8161308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069615
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105436
_version_ 1783700479827509248
author Toplitsch, Daniela
Platzer, Sabine
Zehner, Romana
Maitz, Stephanie
Mascher, Franz
Kittinger, Clemens
author_facet Toplitsch, Daniela
Platzer, Sabine
Zehner, Romana
Maitz, Stephanie
Mascher, Franz
Kittinger, Clemens
author_sort Toplitsch, Daniela
collection PubMed
description The difficulty of cultivation of Legionella spp. from water samples remains a strenuous task even for experienced laboratories. The long incubation periods for Legionellae make isolation difficult. In addition, the water samples themselves are often contaminated with accompanying microbial flora, and therefore require complex cultivation methods from diagnostic laboratories. In addition to the recent update of the standard culture method ISO 11731:2017, new strategies such as quantitative PCR (qPCR) are often discussed as alternatives or additions to conventional Legionella culture approaches. In this study, we compared ISO 11731:2017 with qPCR assays targeting Legionella spp., Legionella pneumophila, and Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1. In samples with a high burden of accompanying microbial flora, qPCR shows an excellent negative predictive value for Legionella pneumophila, thus making qPCR an excellent tool for pre-selection of negative samples prior to work-intensive culture methods. This and its low limit of detection make qPCR a diagnostic asset in Legionellosis outbreak investigations, where quick-risk assessments are essential, and are a useful method for monitoring risk sites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8161308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81613082021-05-29 Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples Toplitsch, Daniela Platzer, Sabine Zehner, Romana Maitz, Stephanie Mascher, Franz Kittinger, Clemens Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The difficulty of cultivation of Legionella spp. from water samples remains a strenuous task even for experienced laboratories. The long incubation periods for Legionellae make isolation difficult. In addition, the water samples themselves are often contaminated with accompanying microbial flora, and therefore require complex cultivation methods from diagnostic laboratories. In addition to the recent update of the standard culture method ISO 11731:2017, new strategies such as quantitative PCR (qPCR) are often discussed as alternatives or additions to conventional Legionella culture approaches. In this study, we compared ISO 11731:2017 with qPCR assays targeting Legionella spp., Legionella pneumophila, and Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1. In samples with a high burden of accompanying microbial flora, qPCR shows an excellent negative predictive value for Legionella pneumophila, thus making qPCR an excellent tool for pre-selection of negative samples prior to work-intensive culture methods. This and its low limit of detection make qPCR a diagnostic asset in Legionellosis outbreak investigations, where quick-risk assessments are essential, and are a useful method for monitoring risk sites. MDPI 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8161308/ /pubmed/34069615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105436 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Toplitsch, Daniela
Platzer, Sabine
Zehner, Romana
Maitz, Stephanie
Mascher, Franz
Kittinger, Clemens
Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples
title Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples
title_full Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples
title_fullStr Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples
title_short Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples
title_sort comparison of updated methods for legionella detection in environmental water samples
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8161308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069615
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105436
work_keys_str_mv AT toplitschdaniela comparisonofupdatedmethodsforlegionelladetectioninenvironmentalwatersamples
AT platzersabine comparisonofupdatedmethodsforlegionelladetectioninenvironmentalwatersamples
AT zehnerromana comparisonofupdatedmethodsforlegionelladetectioninenvironmentalwatersamples
AT maitzstephanie comparisonofupdatedmethodsforlegionelladetectioninenvironmentalwatersamples
AT mascherfranz comparisonofupdatedmethodsforlegionelladetectioninenvironmentalwatersamples
AT kittingerclemens comparisonofupdatedmethodsforlegionelladetectioninenvironmentalwatersamples