Cargando…
Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples
The difficulty of cultivation of Legionella spp. from water samples remains a strenuous task even for experienced laboratories. The long incubation periods for Legionellae make isolation difficult. In addition, the water samples themselves are often contaminated with accompanying microbial flora, an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8161308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105436 |
_version_ | 1783700479827509248 |
---|---|
author | Toplitsch, Daniela Platzer, Sabine Zehner, Romana Maitz, Stephanie Mascher, Franz Kittinger, Clemens |
author_facet | Toplitsch, Daniela Platzer, Sabine Zehner, Romana Maitz, Stephanie Mascher, Franz Kittinger, Clemens |
author_sort | Toplitsch, Daniela |
collection | PubMed |
description | The difficulty of cultivation of Legionella spp. from water samples remains a strenuous task even for experienced laboratories. The long incubation periods for Legionellae make isolation difficult. In addition, the water samples themselves are often contaminated with accompanying microbial flora, and therefore require complex cultivation methods from diagnostic laboratories. In addition to the recent update of the standard culture method ISO 11731:2017, new strategies such as quantitative PCR (qPCR) are often discussed as alternatives or additions to conventional Legionella culture approaches. In this study, we compared ISO 11731:2017 with qPCR assays targeting Legionella spp., Legionella pneumophila, and Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1. In samples with a high burden of accompanying microbial flora, qPCR shows an excellent negative predictive value for Legionella pneumophila, thus making qPCR an excellent tool for pre-selection of negative samples prior to work-intensive culture methods. This and its low limit of detection make qPCR a diagnostic asset in Legionellosis outbreak investigations, where quick-risk assessments are essential, and are a useful method for monitoring risk sites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8161308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81613082021-05-29 Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples Toplitsch, Daniela Platzer, Sabine Zehner, Romana Maitz, Stephanie Mascher, Franz Kittinger, Clemens Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The difficulty of cultivation of Legionella spp. from water samples remains a strenuous task even for experienced laboratories. The long incubation periods for Legionellae make isolation difficult. In addition, the water samples themselves are often contaminated with accompanying microbial flora, and therefore require complex cultivation methods from diagnostic laboratories. In addition to the recent update of the standard culture method ISO 11731:2017, new strategies such as quantitative PCR (qPCR) are often discussed as alternatives or additions to conventional Legionella culture approaches. In this study, we compared ISO 11731:2017 with qPCR assays targeting Legionella spp., Legionella pneumophila, and Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1. In samples with a high burden of accompanying microbial flora, qPCR shows an excellent negative predictive value for Legionella pneumophila, thus making qPCR an excellent tool for pre-selection of negative samples prior to work-intensive culture methods. This and its low limit of detection make qPCR a diagnostic asset in Legionellosis outbreak investigations, where quick-risk assessments are essential, and are a useful method for monitoring risk sites. MDPI 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8161308/ /pubmed/34069615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105436 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Toplitsch, Daniela Platzer, Sabine Zehner, Romana Maitz, Stephanie Mascher, Franz Kittinger, Clemens Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples |
title | Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples |
title_full | Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples |
title_short | Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples |
title_sort | comparison of updated methods for legionella detection in environmental water samples |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8161308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105436 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT toplitschdaniela comparisonofupdatedmethodsforlegionelladetectioninenvironmentalwatersamples AT platzersabine comparisonofupdatedmethodsforlegionelladetectioninenvironmentalwatersamples AT zehnerromana comparisonofupdatedmethodsforlegionelladetectioninenvironmentalwatersamples AT maitzstephanie comparisonofupdatedmethodsforlegionelladetectioninenvironmentalwatersamples AT mascherfranz comparisonofupdatedmethodsforlegionelladetectioninenvironmentalwatersamples AT kittingerclemens comparisonofupdatedmethodsforlegionelladetectioninenvironmentalwatersamples |