Cargando…
Comparison of MRI Visualization Following Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
Analysis of magnetic resonance image (MRI) quality after open (Op)-transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) and minimally invasive (MI)-TLIF with the implantation of structurally different systems has not previously been performed. The objective of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8161371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069625 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050906 |
_version_ | 1783700495129378816 |
---|---|
author | Byvaltsev, Vadim A. Kalinin, Andrei A. Giers, Morgan B. Shepelev, Valerii V. Pestryakov, Yurii Ya. Biryuchkov, Mikhail Yu. |
author_facet | Byvaltsev, Vadim A. Kalinin, Andrei A. Giers, Morgan B. Shepelev, Valerii V. Pestryakov, Yurii Ya. Biryuchkov, Mikhail Yu. |
author_sort | Byvaltsev, Vadim A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Analysis of magnetic resonance image (MRI) quality after open (Op)-transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) and minimally invasive (MI)-TLIF with the implantation of structurally different systems has not previously been performed. The objective of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the postoperative MRI following MI and Op one-segment TLIF. Material and Methods: The nonrandomized retrospective single-center study included 80 patients (46 men and 24 women) aged 48 + 14.2 years. In group I (n = 20) Op-TLIF with open transpedicular screw fixation (TSF) was performed, in II group (n = 60), the MI-TLIF technique was used: IIa (n = 20)—rigid interspinous stabilizer; IIb (n = 20)—unilateral TSF and contralateral facet fixation; IIc (n = 20)—bilateral TSF. Results: Comparison of the quality of postoperative imaging in IIa and IIb subgroups showed fewer MRI artifacts and a significantly greater MR deterioration after Op and MI TSF. Comparison of the multifidus muscle area showed less atrophy after MI-TLIF and significantly greater atrophy after Op-TLIF. Conclusion: MI-TLIF and Op-TLIF with TSF have comparable postoperative MR artifacts at the operative level, with a greater degree of muscle atrophy using the Op-TLIF. Rigid interspinous implant and unilateral TSF with contralateral facet fixation have less artifacts and changes in the multifidus muscle area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8161371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81613712021-05-29 Comparison of MRI Visualization Following Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF: A Retrospective Single-Center Study Byvaltsev, Vadim A. Kalinin, Andrei A. Giers, Morgan B. Shepelev, Valerii V. Pestryakov, Yurii Ya. Biryuchkov, Mikhail Yu. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Analysis of magnetic resonance image (MRI) quality after open (Op)-transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) and minimally invasive (MI)-TLIF with the implantation of structurally different systems has not previously been performed. The objective of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the postoperative MRI following MI and Op one-segment TLIF. Material and Methods: The nonrandomized retrospective single-center study included 80 patients (46 men and 24 women) aged 48 + 14.2 years. In group I (n = 20) Op-TLIF with open transpedicular screw fixation (TSF) was performed, in II group (n = 60), the MI-TLIF technique was used: IIa (n = 20)—rigid interspinous stabilizer; IIb (n = 20)—unilateral TSF and contralateral facet fixation; IIc (n = 20)—bilateral TSF. Results: Comparison of the quality of postoperative imaging in IIa and IIb subgroups showed fewer MRI artifacts and a significantly greater MR deterioration after Op and MI TSF. Comparison of the multifidus muscle area showed less atrophy after MI-TLIF and significantly greater atrophy after Op-TLIF. Conclusion: MI-TLIF and Op-TLIF with TSF have comparable postoperative MR artifacts at the operative level, with a greater degree of muscle atrophy using the Op-TLIF. Rigid interspinous implant and unilateral TSF with contralateral facet fixation have less artifacts and changes in the multifidus muscle area. MDPI 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8161371/ /pubmed/34069625 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050906 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Byvaltsev, Vadim A. Kalinin, Andrei A. Giers, Morgan B. Shepelev, Valerii V. Pestryakov, Yurii Ya. Biryuchkov, Mikhail Yu. Comparison of MRI Visualization Following Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title | Comparison of MRI Visualization Following Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title_full | Comparison of MRI Visualization Following Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of MRI Visualization Following Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of MRI Visualization Following Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title_short | Comparison of MRI Visualization Following Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title_sort | comparison of mri visualization following minimally invasive and open tlif: a retrospective single-center study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8161371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069625 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050906 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT byvaltsevvadima comparisonofmrivisualizationfollowingminimallyinvasiveandopentlifaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT kalininandreia comparisonofmrivisualizationfollowingminimallyinvasiveandopentlifaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT giersmorganb comparisonofmrivisualizationfollowingminimallyinvasiveandopentlifaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT shepelevvaleriiv comparisonofmrivisualizationfollowingminimallyinvasiveandopentlifaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT pestryakovyuriiya comparisonofmrivisualizationfollowingminimallyinvasiveandopentlifaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT biryuchkovmikhailyu comparisonofmrivisualizationfollowingminimallyinvasiveandopentlifaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy |