Cargando…

The Polish Version of the Resilience Scale 25: Adaptation and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation

Background: The aim of the presented series of studies was to test the factor structure and assess the psychometric properties of the Resilience Scale 25 in the Polish population. It was developed and tested during the course of four independent studies analysing various aspects of the validation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Konaszewski, Karol, Skalski, Sebastian, Surzykiewicz, Janusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8161488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34054674
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668800
_version_ 1783700522678616064
author Konaszewski, Karol
Skalski, Sebastian
Surzykiewicz, Janusz
author_facet Konaszewski, Karol
Skalski, Sebastian
Surzykiewicz, Janusz
author_sort Konaszewski, Karol
collection PubMed
description Background: The aim of the presented series of studies was to test the factor structure and assess the psychometric properties of the Resilience Scale 25 in the Polish population. It was developed and tested during the course of four independent studies analysing various aspects of the validation of the RS 25 questionnaire’s Polish version. Method: Study 1 concerned the procedure for developing the Polish language version. Study 2 (N = 2716) consisted of reliability tests and a confirmatory factor analysis. In Studies 3 (N = 733) and 4 (N = 431), the validity was assessed by examining the relationship between resilience and the assessment of ego-resiliency, the risk of depression, styles of coping with stress, perceived stress, and satisfaction with life. Results: The presented research results obtained using the measure indicate that it can be considered to be a reliable and valid research tool. A five-factor solution showed a good fit to the data: χ(2)/df = 12.85; RMSEA = 0.066 (low = 0.064; high = 0.068; 90% CI); GFI = 0.90; AGFI = 0.90. An assessment of the internal consistency was carried out on the basis of Cronbach’s alpha. The values achieved were satisfactory and indicate acceptable internal reliability of the questionnaire (0.89) and of the five dimensions: (1) purpose (0.65); (2) equanimity (0.65); (3) self-reliance (0.75); (4) perseverance (0.72); and (5) existential aloneness (0.66). In accordance with the predictions and earlier studies, resilience was correlated positively with ego-resiliency, a task-oriented style of coping with stress, and life satisfaction and negatively with perceived stress, the risk of depression, and an emotion-oriented coping style. Conclusion: The Polish version of the RS 25 allows the assessment of the intensity of resilience as a general indicator and its five constituting dimensions. Such a measurement seems to be important from the perspective of assessing the role of an individual’s resources in clinical psychology, health psychology, and psychotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8161488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81614882021-05-29 The Polish Version of the Resilience Scale 25: Adaptation and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation Konaszewski, Karol Skalski, Sebastian Surzykiewicz, Janusz Front Psychol Psychology Background: The aim of the presented series of studies was to test the factor structure and assess the psychometric properties of the Resilience Scale 25 in the Polish population. It was developed and tested during the course of four independent studies analysing various aspects of the validation of the RS 25 questionnaire’s Polish version. Method: Study 1 concerned the procedure for developing the Polish language version. Study 2 (N = 2716) consisted of reliability tests and a confirmatory factor analysis. In Studies 3 (N = 733) and 4 (N = 431), the validity was assessed by examining the relationship between resilience and the assessment of ego-resiliency, the risk of depression, styles of coping with stress, perceived stress, and satisfaction with life. Results: The presented research results obtained using the measure indicate that it can be considered to be a reliable and valid research tool. A five-factor solution showed a good fit to the data: χ(2)/df = 12.85; RMSEA = 0.066 (low = 0.064; high = 0.068; 90% CI); GFI = 0.90; AGFI = 0.90. An assessment of the internal consistency was carried out on the basis of Cronbach’s alpha. The values achieved were satisfactory and indicate acceptable internal reliability of the questionnaire (0.89) and of the five dimensions: (1) purpose (0.65); (2) equanimity (0.65); (3) self-reliance (0.75); (4) perseverance (0.72); and (5) existential aloneness (0.66). In accordance with the predictions and earlier studies, resilience was correlated positively with ego-resiliency, a task-oriented style of coping with stress, and life satisfaction and negatively with perceived stress, the risk of depression, and an emotion-oriented coping style. Conclusion: The Polish version of the RS 25 allows the assessment of the intensity of resilience as a general indicator and its five constituting dimensions. Such a measurement seems to be important from the perspective of assessing the role of an individual’s resources in clinical psychology, health psychology, and psychotherapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8161488/ /pubmed/34054674 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668800 Text en Copyright © 2021 Konaszewski, Skalski and Surzykiewicz. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Konaszewski, Karol
Skalski, Sebastian
Surzykiewicz, Janusz
The Polish Version of the Resilience Scale 25: Adaptation and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation
title The Polish Version of the Resilience Scale 25: Adaptation and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation
title_full The Polish Version of the Resilience Scale 25: Adaptation and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation
title_fullStr The Polish Version of the Resilience Scale 25: Adaptation and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The Polish Version of the Resilience Scale 25: Adaptation and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation
title_short The Polish Version of the Resilience Scale 25: Adaptation and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation
title_sort polish version of the resilience scale 25: adaptation and preliminary psychometric evaluation
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8161488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34054674
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668800
work_keys_str_mv AT konaszewskikarol thepolishversionoftheresiliencescale25adaptationandpreliminarypsychometricevaluation
AT skalskisebastian thepolishversionoftheresiliencescale25adaptationandpreliminarypsychometricevaluation
AT surzykiewiczjanusz thepolishversionoftheresiliencescale25adaptationandpreliminarypsychometricevaluation
AT konaszewskikarol polishversionoftheresiliencescale25adaptationandpreliminarypsychometricevaluation
AT skalskisebastian polishversionoftheresiliencescale25adaptationandpreliminarypsychometricevaluation
AT surzykiewiczjanusz polishversionoftheresiliencescale25adaptationandpreliminarypsychometricevaluation