Cargando…
Impact of pharmacy intervention on influenza vaccination acceptance: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
Background Vaccination plays an important role in the prevention of influenza. Channels that improve vaccination adherence can play a vital part in improving patient care. This study seeks to inform the design and implementation of pharmacy interventions at scale on improving influenza vaccination r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8161720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34047881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-021-01250-1 |
_version_ | 1783700560289988608 |
---|---|
author | Murray, Erin Bieniek, Karolina del Aguila, Michael Egodage, Sonya Litzinger, Severine Mazouz, Assia Mills, Henry Liska, Jan |
author_facet | Murray, Erin Bieniek, Karolina del Aguila, Michael Egodage, Sonya Litzinger, Severine Mazouz, Assia Mills, Henry Liska, Jan |
author_sort | Murray, Erin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Vaccination plays an important role in the prevention of influenza. Channels that improve vaccination adherence can play a vital part in improving patient care. This study seeks to inform the design and implementation of pharmacy interventions at scale on improving influenza vaccination rates. Aim of the review The aim of this study was to identify key success factors for effective pharmacy intervention design and implementation to improve vaccination acceptance rates in influenza. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed to find literature on influenza vaccinations delivered at pharmacies, pharmacist-delivered influenza vaccinations, or influenza vaccination campaigns originating in the pharmacy setting. A meta-analysis using a random effects model estimated the impact of pharmacy intervention on vaccination rates (assessed as relative risk [RR] and 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]). Results A total of 1221 studies were found that met the search criteria, of which 12 were selected for the literature review following eligibility screening. A meta-analysis of studies that contained binary total population and vaccination rate data was conducted on 6 studies, including 3182 participants, the vaccination rate was 24% higher in those who used the pharmacy-based intervention compared with those who used standard care [RR (95% CI) 1.24 (1.05, 1.47)]. Two separate sensitivity analyses were run for the vaccination rate. In participants aged ≥ 65 years, the vaccination rate was 3% higher in those who received the pharmacy-based intervention compared with those who received standard care; however, this change was not significant [RR (95% CI) 1.03 (0.86, 1.24)]. Additionally, a qualitative review showed that more successful pharmacy-based interventions were those with the more active involvement of pharmacists in routine care. This included regular checkup of vaccine status, proactive conversations and recommendations about vaccination, and pharmacy-based immunization programs, with specific vaccination days. In-pharmacy communication rather than passive information, such as through leaflets and posters was also more effective. Conclusion Pharmacists can play a significant role to improve patient treatment, adherence, and outcomes associated with influenza vaccines. Once pharmacy-based immunization is established, proactive involvement of is key to ensure successful program implementation and results. Expanding access for pharmacists and pharmacy intervention to provide vaccinations may increase vaccination acceptance and could be a valuable intervention in patient care. Additional studies should consider high-risk populations to inform optimal design and implementation strategies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-021-01250-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8161720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81617202021-05-28 Impact of pharmacy intervention on influenza vaccination acceptance: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis Murray, Erin Bieniek, Karolina del Aguila, Michael Egodage, Sonya Litzinger, Severine Mazouz, Assia Mills, Henry Liska, Jan Int J Clin Pharm Review Article Background Vaccination plays an important role in the prevention of influenza. Channels that improve vaccination adherence can play a vital part in improving patient care. This study seeks to inform the design and implementation of pharmacy interventions at scale on improving influenza vaccination rates. Aim of the review The aim of this study was to identify key success factors for effective pharmacy intervention design and implementation to improve vaccination acceptance rates in influenza. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed to find literature on influenza vaccinations delivered at pharmacies, pharmacist-delivered influenza vaccinations, or influenza vaccination campaigns originating in the pharmacy setting. A meta-analysis using a random effects model estimated the impact of pharmacy intervention on vaccination rates (assessed as relative risk [RR] and 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]). Results A total of 1221 studies were found that met the search criteria, of which 12 were selected for the literature review following eligibility screening. A meta-analysis of studies that contained binary total population and vaccination rate data was conducted on 6 studies, including 3182 participants, the vaccination rate was 24% higher in those who used the pharmacy-based intervention compared with those who used standard care [RR (95% CI) 1.24 (1.05, 1.47)]. Two separate sensitivity analyses were run for the vaccination rate. In participants aged ≥ 65 years, the vaccination rate was 3% higher in those who received the pharmacy-based intervention compared with those who received standard care; however, this change was not significant [RR (95% CI) 1.03 (0.86, 1.24)]. Additionally, a qualitative review showed that more successful pharmacy-based interventions were those with the more active involvement of pharmacists in routine care. This included regular checkup of vaccine status, proactive conversations and recommendations about vaccination, and pharmacy-based immunization programs, with specific vaccination days. In-pharmacy communication rather than passive information, such as through leaflets and posters was also more effective. Conclusion Pharmacists can play a significant role to improve patient treatment, adherence, and outcomes associated with influenza vaccines. Once pharmacy-based immunization is established, proactive involvement of is key to ensure successful program implementation and results. Expanding access for pharmacists and pharmacy intervention to provide vaccinations may increase vaccination acceptance and could be a valuable intervention in patient care. Additional studies should consider high-risk populations to inform optimal design and implementation strategies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-021-01250-1. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8161720/ /pubmed/34047881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-021-01250-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Murray, Erin Bieniek, Karolina del Aguila, Michael Egodage, Sonya Litzinger, Severine Mazouz, Assia Mills, Henry Liska, Jan Impact of pharmacy intervention on influenza vaccination acceptance: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title | Impact of pharmacy intervention on influenza vaccination acceptance: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Impact of pharmacy intervention on influenza vaccination acceptance: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Impact of pharmacy intervention on influenza vaccination acceptance: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of pharmacy intervention on influenza vaccination acceptance: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Impact of pharmacy intervention on influenza vaccination acceptance: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | impact of pharmacy intervention on influenza vaccination acceptance: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8161720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34047881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-021-01250-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murrayerin impactofpharmacyinterventiononinfluenzavaccinationacceptanceasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT bieniekkarolina impactofpharmacyinterventiononinfluenzavaccinationacceptanceasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT delaguilamichael impactofpharmacyinterventiononinfluenzavaccinationacceptanceasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT egodagesonya impactofpharmacyinterventiononinfluenzavaccinationacceptanceasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT litzingerseverine impactofpharmacyinterventiononinfluenzavaccinationacceptanceasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT mazouzassia impactofpharmacyinterventiononinfluenzavaccinationacceptanceasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT millshenry impactofpharmacyinterventiononinfluenzavaccinationacceptanceasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT liskajan impactofpharmacyinterventiononinfluenzavaccinationacceptanceasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis |