Cargando…
Microsleep versus Sleep Onset Latency during Maintenance Wakefulness Tests: Which One Is the Best Marker of Sleepiness?
The interpretation of the Maintenance Wakefulness Test (MWT) relies on sleep onset detection. However, microsleeps (MSs), i.e., brief periods of sleep intrusion during wakefulness, may occur before sleep onset. We assessed the prevalence of MSs during the MWT and their contribution to the diagnosis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8161762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33946265 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep3020016 |
_version_ | 1783700570032308224 |
---|---|
author | Des Champs de Boishebert, Ludivine Pradat, Pierre Bastuji, Hélène Ricordeau, François Gormand, Frédéric Le Cam, Pierre Stauffer, Emeric Petitjean, Thierry Peter-Derex, Laure |
author_facet | Des Champs de Boishebert, Ludivine Pradat, Pierre Bastuji, Hélène Ricordeau, François Gormand, Frédéric Le Cam, Pierre Stauffer, Emeric Petitjean, Thierry Peter-Derex, Laure |
author_sort | Des Champs de Boishebert, Ludivine |
collection | PubMed |
description | The interpretation of the Maintenance Wakefulness Test (MWT) relies on sleep onset detection. However, microsleeps (MSs), i.e., brief periods of sleep intrusion during wakefulness, may occur before sleep onset. We assessed the prevalence of MSs during the MWT and their contribution to the diagnosis of residual sleepiness in patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or hypersomnia. The MWT of 98 patients (89 OSA, 82.6% male) were analyzed for MS scoring. Polysomnography parameters and clinical data were collected. The diagnostic value for detecting sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale > 10) of sleep onset latency (SOL) and of the first MS latency (MSL) was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC, 95% CI). At least one MS was observed in 62.2% of patients. MSL was positively correlated with SOL (r = 0.72, p < 0.0001) but not with subjective scales, clinical variables, or polysomnography parameters. The use of SOL or MSL did not influence the diagnostic performance of the MWT for subjective sleepiness assessment (AUC = 0.66 95% CI (0.56, 0.77) versus 0.63 95% CI (0.51, 0.74)). MSs are frequent during MWTs performed in patients treated for sleep disorders, even in the absence of subjective sleepiness, and may represent physiological markers of the wake-to-sleep transition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8161762 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81617622021-05-29 Microsleep versus Sleep Onset Latency during Maintenance Wakefulness Tests: Which One Is the Best Marker of Sleepiness? Des Champs de Boishebert, Ludivine Pradat, Pierre Bastuji, Hélène Ricordeau, François Gormand, Frédéric Le Cam, Pierre Stauffer, Emeric Petitjean, Thierry Peter-Derex, Laure Clocks Sleep Article The interpretation of the Maintenance Wakefulness Test (MWT) relies on sleep onset detection. However, microsleeps (MSs), i.e., brief periods of sleep intrusion during wakefulness, may occur before sleep onset. We assessed the prevalence of MSs during the MWT and their contribution to the diagnosis of residual sleepiness in patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or hypersomnia. The MWT of 98 patients (89 OSA, 82.6% male) were analyzed for MS scoring. Polysomnography parameters and clinical data were collected. The diagnostic value for detecting sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale > 10) of sleep onset latency (SOL) and of the first MS latency (MSL) was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC, 95% CI). At least one MS was observed in 62.2% of patients. MSL was positively correlated with SOL (r = 0.72, p < 0.0001) but not with subjective scales, clinical variables, or polysomnography parameters. The use of SOL or MSL did not influence the diagnostic performance of the MWT for subjective sleepiness assessment (AUC = 0.66 95% CI (0.56, 0.77) versus 0.63 95% CI (0.51, 0.74)). MSs are frequent during MWTs performed in patients treated for sleep disorders, even in the absence of subjective sleepiness, and may represent physiological markers of the wake-to-sleep transition. MDPI 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8161762/ /pubmed/33946265 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep3020016 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Des Champs de Boishebert, Ludivine Pradat, Pierre Bastuji, Hélène Ricordeau, François Gormand, Frédéric Le Cam, Pierre Stauffer, Emeric Petitjean, Thierry Peter-Derex, Laure Microsleep versus Sleep Onset Latency during Maintenance Wakefulness Tests: Which One Is the Best Marker of Sleepiness? |
title | Microsleep versus Sleep Onset Latency during Maintenance Wakefulness Tests: Which One Is the Best Marker of Sleepiness? |
title_full | Microsleep versus Sleep Onset Latency during Maintenance Wakefulness Tests: Which One Is the Best Marker of Sleepiness? |
title_fullStr | Microsleep versus Sleep Onset Latency during Maintenance Wakefulness Tests: Which One Is the Best Marker of Sleepiness? |
title_full_unstemmed | Microsleep versus Sleep Onset Latency during Maintenance Wakefulness Tests: Which One Is the Best Marker of Sleepiness? |
title_short | Microsleep versus Sleep Onset Latency during Maintenance Wakefulness Tests: Which One Is the Best Marker of Sleepiness? |
title_sort | microsleep versus sleep onset latency during maintenance wakefulness tests: which one is the best marker of sleepiness? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8161762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33946265 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep3020016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deschampsdeboishebertludivine microsleepversussleeponsetlatencyduringmaintenancewakefulnesstestswhichoneisthebestmarkerofsleepiness AT pradatpierre microsleepversussleeponsetlatencyduringmaintenancewakefulnesstestswhichoneisthebestmarkerofsleepiness AT bastujihelene microsleepversussleeponsetlatencyduringmaintenancewakefulnesstestswhichoneisthebestmarkerofsleepiness AT ricordeaufrancois microsleepversussleeponsetlatencyduringmaintenancewakefulnesstestswhichoneisthebestmarkerofsleepiness AT gormandfrederic microsleepversussleeponsetlatencyduringmaintenancewakefulnesstestswhichoneisthebestmarkerofsleepiness AT lecampierre microsleepversussleeponsetlatencyduringmaintenancewakefulnesstestswhichoneisthebestmarkerofsleepiness AT staufferemeric microsleepversussleeponsetlatencyduringmaintenancewakefulnesstestswhichoneisthebestmarkerofsleepiness AT petitjeanthierry microsleepversussleeponsetlatencyduringmaintenancewakefulnesstestswhichoneisthebestmarkerofsleepiness AT peterderexlaure microsleepversussleeponsetlatencyduringmaintenancewakefulnesstestswhichoneisthebestmarkerofsleepiness |