Cargando…

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum contraception planning

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid adjustment of obstetrical delivery models including fewer antenatal appointments and increased use of telehealth. We hypothesized that an increase in telemedicine and a decrease in antepartum visits owing to the COVID-19 pandemic led to a decreased...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Hayley E., Henkel, Andrea, Leonard, Stephanie A., Miller, Sarah E., Tran, Linh, Bianco, Katherine, Shaw, Kate A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8161810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34058421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100412
_version_ 1783700581328617472
author Miller, Hayley E.
Henkel, Andrea
Leonard, Stephanie A.
Miller, Sarah E.
Tran, Linh
Bianco, Katherine
Shaw, Kate A.
author_facet Miller, Hayley E.
Henkel, Andrea
Leonard, Stephanie A.
Miller, Sarah E.
Tran, Linh
Bianco, Katherine
Shaw, Kate A.
author_sort Miller, Hayley E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid adjustment of obstetrical delivery models including fewer antenatal appointments and increased use of telehealth. We hypothesized that an increase in telemedicine and a decrease in antepartum visits owing to the COVID-19 pandemic led to a decreased proportion of people with a postpartum contraception plan at the time of the birth-hospitalization admission and a reduced uptake of top-tier forms of contraception at birth-hospitalization admission and discharge, and the routine postpartum visit, which has otherwise been increasing in recent years.(1)(,)(2) STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study comparing a randomly selected sample of people giving birth at a large, tertiary referral center during a regional “shelter in place” order, March 16, 2020, to July 31, 2020, with a previously abstracted random sample of people delivering between November 1, 2017, and April 30, 2018, was conducted. This study was reviewed and approved by the Stanford University Institutional Review Board before its initiation. The study was powered to detect a 10% difference in the proportion of those arriving at birth-hospitalization with a contraceptive plan (power 80%, alpha 0.05). The final sample size included 586 people (318 in the pre-COVID cohort and 268 in the COVID cohort). Multivariable modified Poisson regression model was used to estimate the relative risk of arriving at birth-hospitalization with a contraceptive plan in pre-COVID vs COVID cohorts, adjusting for age, parity, insurance status, and delivery mode. Secondary outcomes included tier of contraception plan at admission, discharge, and 6 weeks postpartum (classified by World Health Organization Tiered-Effectiveness(3)), attendance at postpartum visit, and whether the postpartum visit was conducted via telehealth. Tiered effectiveness was used for this study's purposes because it was hypothesized that telehealth would mostly affect the provision of top-tier forms of contraception that require in-person initiation. Fisher exact test was used to compare the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: For the 2 cohorts, the median age was 32 years (range, 17–48 years) and median parity was 1 (range, 0–6). The majority (78%) had private insurance and most commonly identified as non-Hispanic White (38%) and Asian (36%). Baseline demographics did not differ between the cohorts. At birth-hospitalization admission, a smaller proportion of people had a postpartum contraceptive plan in the COVID cohort than in the pre-COVID cohort (73.9% vs 99.4%, adjusted risk ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.84–0.91, P<.001). A smaller proportion of people had a plan for top-tier contraception among the COVID cohort compared with the pre-COVID cohort at both admission and discharge (46.0% vs 71.0%, P<.01 and 31.0% vs 37.9%, P=.05) (Figure). More than 80% of the people attended a routine postpartum visit in both cohorts (P=.30) with 17.7% being telehealth visits in the COVID cohort compared with telehealth not being offered pre-COVID. Among those who attended their postpartum visit, the proportion discharged with a plan for interval top-tier contraception that was fulfilled was high in both groups (76.3% pre-COVID vs 71.2% post-COVID, P=.56). CONCLUSION: The study found a significant decrease in people arriving at birth-hospitalization with a contraception plan in the months following a COVID-19 “shelter in place” order when compared with the pre-COVID cohort. It is suspected that changes in the obstetrical service models indirectly deprioritized the most effective forms of postpartum contraception because sterilization requires a signed consent before birth-hospitalization and postplacental intrauterine devices require consent before delivery.(4)(,)(5) Current state legislation requiring in-person signature to consent for federally funded sterilization remains a barrier. We found that fewer individuals left with top-tier contraception than with plan on admission, especially within the COVID cohort. In addition to clinical contraindications that arise during labor, which preclude placement of an intrauterine device in the postpartum setting, many patients requested an expedited discharge during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the prenatal care model continues, this transition to adopt virtual visits, reduce visit schedules, and expedite postpartum discharge, actualizing patients’ contraceptive plans is increasingly more dependent on early inpatient provision. Maternity care providers should consider initiating postpartum contraception counseling and completing mandatory consents earlier in the antenatal period. This study is inherently limited by its retrospective nature of review and additional qualitative studies may better characterize this trend in contraceptive uptake. In the meantime, obstetrical care providers should carefully evaluate institutional barriers to postpartum contraception during this movement to telehealth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8161810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81618102021-05-28 The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum contraception planning Miller, Hayley E. Henkel, Andrea Leonard, Stephanie A. Miller, Sarah E. Tran, Linh Bianco, Katherine Shaw, Kate A. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM Research Letter OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid adjustment of obstetrical delivery models including fewer antenatal appointments and increased use of telehealth. We hypothesized that an increase in telemedicine and a decrease in antepartum visits owing to the COVID-19 pandemic led to a decreased proportion of people with a postpartum contraception plan at the time of the birth-hospitalization admission and a reduced uptake of top-tier forms of contraception at birth-hospitalization admission and discharge, and the routine postpartum visit, which has otherwise been increasing in recent years.(1)(,)(2) STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study comparing a randomly selected sample of people giving birth at a large, tertiary referral center during a regional “shelter in place” order, March 16, 2020, to July 31, 2020, with a previously abstracted random sample of people delivering between November 1, 2017, and April 30, 2018, was conducted. This study was reviewed and approved by the Stanford University Institutional Review Board before its initiation. The study was powered to detect a 10% difference in the proportion of those arriving at birth-hospitalization with a contraceptive plan (power 80%, alpha 0.05). The final sample size included 586 people (318 in the pre-COVID cohort and 268 in the COVID cohort). Multivariable modified Poisson regression model was used to estimate the relative risk of arriving at birth-hospitalization with a contraceptive plan in pre-COVID vs COVID cohorts, adjusting for age, parity, insurance status, and delivery mode. Secondary outcomes included tier of contraception plan at admission, discharge, and 6 weeks postpartum (classified by World Health Organization Tiered-Effectiveness(3)), attendance at postpartum visit, and whether the postpartum visit was conducted via telehealth. Tiered effectiveness was used for this study's purposes because it was hypothesized that telehealth would mostly affect the provision of top-tier forms of contraception that require in-person initiation. Fisher exact test was used to compare the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: For the 2 cohorts, the median age was 32 years (range, 17–48 years) and median parity was 1 (range, 0–6). The majority (78%) had private insurance and most commonly identified as non-Hispanic White (38%) and Asian (36%). Baseline demographics did not differ between the cohorts. At birth-hospitalization admission, a smaller proportion of people had a postpartum contraceptive plan in the COVID cohort than in the pre-COVID cohort (73.9% vs 99.4%, adjusted risk ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.84–0.91, P<.001). A smaller proportion of people had a plan for top-tier contraception among the COVID cohort compared with the pre-COVID cohort at both admission and discharge (46.0% vs 71.0%, P<.01 and 31.0% vs 37.9%, P=.05) (Figure). More than 80% of the people attended a routine postpartum visit in both cohorts (P=.30) with 17.7% being telehealth visits in the COVID cohort compared with telehealth not being offered pre-COVID. Among those who attended their postpartum visit, the proportion discharged with a plan for interval top-tier contraception that was fulfilled was high in both groups (76.3% pre-COVID vs 71.2% post-COVID, P=.56). CONCLUSION: The study found a significant decrease in people arriving at birth-hospitalization with a contraception plan in the months following a COVID-19 “shelter in place” order when compared with the pre-COVID cohort. It is suspected that changes in the obstetrical service models indirectly deprioritized the most effective forms of postpartum contraception because sterilization requires a signed consent before birth-hospitalization and postplacental intrauterine devices require consent before delivery.(4)(,)(5) Current state legislation requiring in-person signature to consent for federally funded sterilization remains a barrier. We found that fewer individuals left with top-tier contraception than with plan on admission, especially within the COVID cohort. In addition to clinical contraindications that arise during labor, which preclude placement of an intrauterine device in the postpartum setting, many patients requested an expedited discharge during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the prenatal care model continues, this transition to adopt virtual visits, reduce visit schedules, and expedite postpartum discharge, actualizing patients’ contraceptive plans is increasingly more dependent on early inpatient provision. Maternity care providers should consider initiating postpartum contraception counseling and completing mandatory consents earlier in the antenatal period. This study is inherently limited by its retrospective nature of review and additional qualitative studies may better characterize this trend in contraceptive uptake. In the meantime, obstetrical care providers should carefully evaluate institutional barriers to postpartum contraception during this movement to telehealth. Elsevier Inc. 2021-09 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8161810/ /pubmed/34058421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100412 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Research Letter
Miller, Hayley E.
Henkel, Andrea
Leonard, Stephanie A.
Miller, Sarah E.
Tran, Linh
Bianco, Katherine
Shaw, Kate A.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum contraception planning
title The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum contraception planning
title_full The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum contraception planning
title_fullStr The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum contraception planning
title_full_unstemmed The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum contraception planning
title_short The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum contraception planning
title_sort impact of the covid-19 pandemic on postpartum contraception planning
topic Research Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8161810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34058421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100412
work_keys_str_mv AT millerhayleye theimpactofthecovid19pandemiconpostpartumcontraceptionplanning
AT henkelandrea theimpactofthecovid19pandemiconpostpartumcontraceptionplanning
AT leonardstephaniea theimpactofthecovid19pandemiconpostpartumcontraceptionplanning
AT millersarahe theimpactofthecovid19pandemiconpostpartumcontraceptionplanning
AT tranlinh theimpactofthecovid19pandemiconpostpartumcontraceptionplanning
AT biancokatherine theimpactofthecovid19pandemiconpostpartumcontraceptionplanning
AT shawkatea theimpactofthecovid19pandemiconpostpartumcontraceptionplanning
AT millerhayleye impactofthecovid19pandemiconpostpartumcontraceptionplanning
AT henkelandrea impactofthecovid19pandemiconpostpartumcontraceptionplanning
AT leonardstephaniea impactofthecovid19pandemiconpostpartumcontraceptionplanning
AT millersarahe impactofthecovid19pandemiconpostpartumcontraceptionplanning
AT tranlinh impactofthecovid19pandemiconpostpartumcontraceptionplanning
AT biancokatherine impactofthecovid19pandemiconpostpartumcontraceptionplanning
AT shawkatea impactofthecovid19pandemiconpostpartumcontraceptionplanning