Cargando…

Development of foot length in children with congenital clubfoot up to 7 years of age: a prospective follow-up study

BACKGROUND: Clubfeet are typically shorter than normal feet. This study aimed first to describe the development of foot length in a consecutive series of children with congenital clubfoot and second to relate foot length to development of relapse and motion quality. METHODS: Foot length was measured...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manousaki, Evgenia, Esbjörnsson, Anna-Clara, Hägglund, Gunnar, Andriesse, Hanneke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8161945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34044803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04323-4
_version_ 1783700613545066496
author Manousaki, Evgenia
Esbjörnsson, Anna-Clara
Hägglund, Gunnar
Andriesse, Hanneke
author_facet Manousaki, Evgenia
Esbjörnsson, Anna-Clara
Hägglund, Gunnar
Andriesse, Hanneke
author_sort Manousaki, Evgenia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clubfeet are typically shorter than normal feet. This study aimed first to describe the development of foot length in a consecutive series of children with congenital clubfoot and second to relate foot length to development of relapse and motion quality. METHODS: Foot length was measured every 6 months in 72 consecutive children with congenital clubfoot (29 bilateral) aged from 2 to 7 years. The initial treatment was nonsurgical followed by standardized orthotic treatment. Foot length growth rate was calculated every half year. In children with unilateral clubfeet, the difference in foot length between the clubfoot and the contralateral foot was calculated. Motion quality was evaluated by the Clubfoot Assessment Protocol (CAP). Student’s t test, the Mann–Whitney U test and Spearman’s correlation were used for group comparisons. Bonferroni correction was used when multiple comparisons were performed. RESULTS: Clubfeet were smaller (P < 0.001) than reference feet at all ages but had a similar growth rate up to age 7. Unilateral clubfeet with greater difference in size compared with the contralateral foot at the first measurement, relapsed more frequently (P = 0.016) and correlated with poorer motion quality (r = 0.4; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: As previously reported, clubfeet were smaller than reference feet at all ages. The growth rate, however, was similar between clubfeet and reference feet. Children with unilateral clubfeet and greater foot length difference at 2 years of age had a higher tendency to relapse and poorer motion quality at 7 years of age, indicating that foot length could be used as a prognostic tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8161945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81619452021-06-01 Development of foot length in children with congenital clubfoot up to 7 years of age: a prospective follow-up study Manousaki, Evgenia Esbjörnsson, Anna-Clara Hägglund, Gunnar Andriesse, Hanneke BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Clubfeet are typically shorter than normal feet. This study aimed first to describe the development of foot length in a consecutive series of children with congenital clubfoot and second to relate foot length to development of relapse and motion quality. METHODS: Foot length was measured every 6 months in 72 consecutive children with congenital clubfoot (29 bilateral) aged from 2 to 7 years. The initial treatment was nonsurgical followed by standardized orthotic treatment. Foot length growth rate was calculated every half year. In children with unilateral clubfeet, the difference in foot length between the clubfoot and the contralateral foot was calculated. Motion quality was evaluated by the Clubfoot Assessment Protocol (CAP). Student’s t test, the Mann–Whitney U test and Spearman’s correlation were used for group comparisons. Bonferroni correction was used when multiple comparisons were performed. RESULTS: Clubfeet were smaller (P < 0.001) than reference feet at all ages but had a similar growth rate up to age 7. Unilateral clubfeet with greater difference in size compared with the contralateral foot at the first measurement, relapsed more frequently (P = 0.016) and correlated with poorer motion quality (r = 0.4; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: As previously reported, clubfeet were smaller than reference feet at all ages. The growth rate, however, was similar between clubfeet and reference feet. Children with unilateral clubfeet and greater foot length difference at 2 years of age had a higher tendency to relapse and poorer motion quality at 7 years of age, indicating that foot length could be used as a prognostic tool. BioMed Central 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8161945/ /pubmed/34044803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04323-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Manousaki, Evgenia
Esbjörnsson, Anna-Clara
Hägglund, Gunnar
Andriesse, Hanneke
Development of foot length in children with congenital clubfoot up to 7 years of age: a prospective follow-up study
title Development of foot length in children with congenital clubfoot up to 7 years of age: a prospective follow-up study
title_full Development of foot length in children with congenital clubfoot up to 7 years of age: a prospective follow-up study
title_fullStr Development of foot length in children with congenital clubfoot up to 7 years of age: a prospective follow-up study
title_full_unstemmed Development of foot length in children with congenital clubfoot up to 7 years of age: a prospective follow-up study
title_short Development of foot length in children with congenital clubfoot up to 7 years of age: a prospective follow-up study
title_sort development of foot length in children with congenital clubfoot up to 7 years of age: a prospective follow-up study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8161945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34044803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04323-4
work_keys_str_mv AT manousakievgenia developmentoffootlengthinchildrenwithcongenitalclubfootupto7yearsofageaprospectivefollowupstudy
AT esbjornssonannaclara developmentoffootlengthinchildrenwithcongenitalclubfootupto7yearsofageaprospectivefollowupstudy
AT hagglundgunnar developmentoffootlengthinchildrenwithcongenitalclubfootupto7yearsofageaprospectivefollowupstudy
AT andriessehanneke developmentoffootlengthinchildrenwithcongenitalclubfootupto7yearsofageaprospectivefollowupstudy