Cargando…

Implementation of a complex intervention to improve hospital discharge: process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: To study the implementation of a cluster randomised controlled effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial testing the effectiveness of a medication review at hospital discharge combined with a communication stimulus between hospital physicians (HPs) and general practitioners (GPs) on reho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rachamin, Yael, Grischott, Thomas, Neuner-Jehle, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8162085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34045217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049872
_version_ 1783700638257905664
author Rachamin, Yael
Grischott, Thomas
Neuner-Jehle, Stefan
author_facet Rachamin, Yael
Grischott, Thomas
Neuner-Jehle, Stefan
author_sort Rachamin, Yael
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To study the implementation of a cluster randomised controlled effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial testing the effectiveness of a medication review at hospital discharge combined with a communication stimulus between hospital physicians (HPs) and general practitioners (GPs) on rehospitalisation of multimorbid older patients. DESIGN: Extension of Grant’s mixed method process evaluation framework to trials with multilevel clustering. SETTING: General internal medicine wards in Swiss hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience samples of 15 chief physicians (of 21 hospitals participating in the effectiveness trial), 60 (74) senior HPs, 65 (164) junior HPs and 187 (411) GPs. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY: Two-hour teaching sessions for senior HPs on a patient-centred, checklist-guided discharge routine. PROCESS EVALUATION COMPONENTS: Data collection on recruitment, delivery and response from chief physicians (semistructured interviews), senior HPs, junior HPs, GPs (surveys) and patients (via HPs). Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics, and interviews analysed using thematic analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Intervention dose (quantitative), implementation fidelity (qualitative), feasibility and acceptability, facilitators and barriers, implementation support strategies. RESULTS: Recruitment of hospitals was laborious but successful, with 21 hospitals recruited. Minimal workload and a perceived benefit for the clinic were crucial factors for participation. Intervention dose was high (95% of checklist activities carried out), but intervention fidelity was limited (discharge letters) or unknown (medication review). Recruitment and retention of patients was challenging, partly due to patient characteristics (old, frail) and the COVID-19 pandemic: Only 612 of the anticipated 2100 patients were recruited, and 31% were lost to follow-up within the first month after discharge. The intervention was deemed feasible and helpful by HPs, and the relevance of the topic appreciated by both HPs and GPs. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this evaluation will support interpretation of the findings of the effectiveness study and may inform researchers and policy makers who aim at improving hospital discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN18427377.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8162085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81620852021-06-10 Implementation of a complex intervention to improve hospital discharge: process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial Rachamin, Yael Grischott, Thomas Neuner-Jehle, Stefan BMJ Open Geriatric Medicine OBJECTIVES: To study the implementation of a cluster randomised controlled effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial testing the effectiveness of a medication review at hospital discharge combined with a communication stimulus between hospital physicians (HPs) and general practitioners (GPs) on rehospitalisation of multimorbid older patients. DESIGN: Extension of Grant’s mixed method process evaluation framework to trials with multilevel clustering. SETTING: General internal medicine wards in Swiss hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience samples of 15 chief physicians (of 21 hospitals participating in the effectiveness trial), 60 (74) senior HPs, 65 (164) junior HPs and 187 (411) GPs. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY: Two-hour teaching sessions for senior HPs on a patient-centred, checklist-guided discharge routine. PROCESS EVALUATION COMPONENTS: Data collection on recruitment, delivery and response from chief physicians (semistructured interviews), senior HPs, junior HPs, GPs (surveys) and patients (via HPs). Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics, and interviews analysed using thematic analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Intervention dose (quantitative), implementation fidelity (qualitative), feasibility and acceptability, facilitators and barriers, implementation support strategies. RESULTS: Recruitment of hospitals was laborious but successful, with 21 hospitals recruited. Minimal workload and a perceived benefit for the clinic were crucial factors for participation. Intervention dose was high (95% of checklist activities carried out), but intervention fidelity was limited (discharge letters) or unknown (medication review). Recruitment and retention of patients was challenging, partly due to patient characteristics (old, frail) and the COVID-19 pandemic: Only 612 of the anticipated 2100 patients were recruited, and 31% were lost to follow-up within the first month after discharge. The intervention was deemed feasible and helpful by HPs, and the relevance of the topic appreciated by both HPs and GPs. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this evaluation will support interpretation of the findings of the effectiveness study and may inform researchers and policy makers who aim at improving hospital discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN18427377. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8162085/ /pubmed/34045217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049872 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Geriatric Medicine
Rachamin, Yael
Grischott, Thomas
Neuner-Jehle, Stefan
Implementation of a complex intervention to improve hospital discharge: process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title Implementation of a complex intervention to improve hospital discharge: process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full Implementation of a complex intervention to improve hospital discharge: process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Implementation of a complex intervention to improve hospital discharge: process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of a complex intervention to improve hospital discharge: process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short Implementation of a complex intervention to improve hospital discharge: process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort implementation of a complex intervention to improve hospital discharge: process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Geriatric Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8162085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34045217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049872
work_keys_str_mv AT rachaminyael implementationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovehospitaldischargeprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT grischottthomas implementationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovehospitaldischargeprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT neunerjehlestefan implementationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovehospitaldischargeprocessevaluationofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial